No abstract

Graphical abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Purpose This study aims to explore whether the application of a positive food safety (FS) climate reduces the number of FS violations in the hospitality industry. Design/methodology/approach The sample comprised 271 food handlers in six hotels and 12 restaurants in Brazil. FS climate and risk perceptions were evaluated by self-applicable questionnaires. FS violations were evaluated through observations during the workday. Structural equation modeling with partial least squares was used to test four hypotheses. Findings The findings of this study suggest that a positive FS climate reduces the number of FS violations. It was also observed that risk perception moderated the relationship between FS climate and violations. Physical structure was also identified as a predictor of adequate FS practices. Practical implications The results indicate that restaurant owners and managers should invest in actions toward a positive FS climate. Originality/value It is evident that FS climate elements should be evaluated together, providing a better understanding of the organizational climate and FS culture. Additionally, the bi-directional effect of risk perception was discussed, affecting and being affected by adequate FS practices. To the best of authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to model the FS climate in the hospitality sector and discuss the implications.

No abstract

This scoping review aimed to map the main evidence in the existing literature regarding consumer perceptions and beliefs regarding food safety in the context of BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) countries. Articles were searched in the Web of Science, Scopus, and SciELO databases. The last search was performed on November 2021. Only the studies conducted within BRICS countries were included. The synthesis aimed to group similarities in consumer beliefs and perceptions of food safety. After screening, 74 eligible articles were included in the study. Of the 74 studies analyzed, 49 (66.2%) were carried out in China, 14 (18.9%) in Brazil, 5 (6.8%) in India,4 (5.4%) in South Africa, and 2 (2.7%) in Russia. Thirty-three motivators of perceptions and beliefs regarding food safety were identified. Food safety motivators were grouped into three categories: (1) sociodemographic characteristics, (2) cognitive aspects, and (3) other. In the “sociodemographic characteristics” category, the motivator with the highest number of corresponding results was education level (results = 22), followed by income (results = 22), both positive drivers for food safety perceptions. The “cognitive aspects” category comprised the majority of the identified motivators. Concern for food safety (results = 32) and risk perception (results = 30) were the motivators with the highest number of results among all categories and motivators. Finally, the main motivator in the “other” category was place of consumption/purchase (results = 8), focusing on consumers underestimating the risk of having a foodborne disease when eating away from home. China and Brazil are leading the way in studies on this topic. Consumers’ perceptions are influenced by socioeconomic characteristics (e.g., age, gender, education level, income), cognitive aspects (e.g., knowledge, risk perception, food concerns, previous experience with food safety incidents) and other situational factors (e.g., price, place of purchase, traceability).

No abstract