Photosensitivity in epilepsy is common and has high heritability, but its genetic basis remains uncertain. Galizia et al. reveal an overrepresentation of unique variants of CHD2 — which encodes the transcriptional regulator ‘chromodomain helicase DNA-binding protein 2’ — in photosensitive epilepsies, and show that chd2 knockdown in zebrafish causes photosensitivity.

No abstract

SUMMARYPurpose: To investigate for the first time the natural history and long-term evolution of ''familial cortical tremor, myoclonus, and epilepsy.'' Methods: We evaluated the clinical, electrophysiologic, and treatment data of 14 patients from three families linked to 2p11.1-q12.2. A simplified scale was used to score myoclonus severity. Electroencephalography (EEG) studies were reviewed for the evaluation of background activity, paroxysmal abnormalities, and photoparoxysmal response. Data were organized for age groups. Correlation and logistic regression analysis were performed. Key Findings: Patients' mean age was 47.8 ± 22.0 years (range 20-86 years). Mean age at disease onset was 20.2 ± 7.8 years (range 11-40 years); mean follow-up duration was 14.0 ± 5.8 years (range 7-28 years). Evaluation at different age groups revealed a gradual, progressive worsening of the myoclonus in 10 patients (71.4%). Two subjects aged >80 years showed myoclonus interfering with autonomous walking. Myoclonus severity was correlated with disease duration (p < 0.001) and patients' age (p = 0.001). Six patients (42.8%) experienced seizures, usually between the second and sixth decades of life. Evaluation of EEG long-term evolution revealed progressive slowing of background activity in parallel with the gradual worsening of myoclonus. In contrast, paroxysmal activity and photosensitivity were particularly evident during the intermediate phases of the disease. In addition, psychiatric and neuropsychological dysfunction occurred in more than one third of the patients. Significance: We provide data for a slight age-dependent progression and the presence of neuropsychiatric and neuropsychological dysfunction in this unique syndrome, for which the definition of familial or autosomal dominant cortical tremor, myoclonus, and epilepsy (FCTME/ ADCME) seems to be, therefore, more appropriate.

22q13.3 deletion syndrome seems to be associated, at least in a subgroup of patients, with a peculiar clinical and EEG pattern, characterized by a childhood epilepsy with a rather benign evolution and with multifocal paroxysmal EEG abnormalities activated by sleep.

Summary Objective Although many studies have attempted to describe treatment outcomes in patients with drug‐resistant epilepsy, results are often limited by the adoption of nonhomogeneous criteria and different definitions of seizure freedom. We sought to evaluate treatment outcomes with a newly administered antiepileptic drug (AED) in a large population of adults with drug‐resistant focal epilepsy according to the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) outcome criteria. Methods This is a multicenter, observational, prospective study of 1053 patients with focal epilepsy diagnosed as drug‐resistant by the investigators. Patients were assessed at baseline and 6, 12, and 18 months, for up to a maximum of 34 months after introducing another AED into their treatment regimen. Drug resistance status and treatment outcomes were rated according to ILAE criteria by the investigators and by at least two independent members of an external expert panel (EP). Results A seizure‐free outcome after a newly administered AED according to ILAE criteria ranged from 11.8% after two failed drugs to 2.6% for more than six failures. Significantly fewer patients were rated by the EP as having a “treatment failure” as compared to the judgment of the investigator (46.7% vs 62.9%, P < 0.001), because many more patients were rated as “undetermined outcome” (45.6% vs 27.7%, P < 0.001); 19.3% of the recruited patients were not considered drug‐resistant by the EP. Significance This study validates the use of ILAE treatment outcome criteria in a real‐life setting, providing validated estimates of seizure freedom in patients with drug‐resistant focal epilepsy in relation to the number of previously failed AEDs. Fewer than one in 10 patients achieved seizure freedom on a newly introduced AED over the study period. Pseudo drug resistance could be identified in one of five cases.