Background: Outpatient clinics were shifted rapidly to telehealth in Australia during the Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic, drastically altering patient care and experience.Aims: To investigate patient satisfaction and acceptability of telehealth consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods: Prospective observation study conducted in two hospital rheumatology outpatient departments (OPD) undertaking telehealth consultations during COVID-19. A modified version of a validated telehealth evaluation survey was posted to all patients attending the telehealth OPD rheumatology clinics, including balanced 5-point Likert scales and free-text responses. Cluster analysis was applied to the Likert-scale questions, alongside thematic analysis of free-text responses.Results: There were 128 respondents (29% response rate), of which 69.5% were women and the majority (87.5%) was aged 50 years or older. All telehealth consultations were conducted by telephone. Nearly one-fifth of patients indicated consistent dissatisfaction with telehealth across the range of questions. These patients were older, reported lower educational qualifications and lower health literacy scores and lacked access to the Internet. While many patients found this mode of consultation to be convenient, patients expressed concerns regarding absence of physical examination. A recurrent theme was a desire for a mixed-model clinic in the future, with flexibility of having both telehealth and face-to-face consultations.Conclusions: This study offers unique insights into patients' experiences with telehealth, which until the current global pandemic, has been an uncommon mode of consultation delivery in urban areas. This study suggests when defining the place of telehealth in future healthcare delivery, patient perspective and careful patient selection will be key. Disease progression, language and cognitive ability, health literacy, technology access and patient and clinician preference are important considerations when deciding how effectively to embed and integrate telehealth into consultations.

Australia can use population level mobility data to fight COVID-19 As we face a second wave of the pandemic, mobility data may assist government public health action

Aim: We aimed to evaluate the diets of children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) against recommended Australian dietary intakes and international T1D guidelines and compare them to children without T1D. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis in 143 children (103 children aged 8-18 years with T1D and 40 age-and gender-matched controls) and longitudinal analysis at 0, 3, 6 and 12 months in 90 T1D children were conducted. Diet was assessed using an Australian validated food frequency questionnaire. Diet quality was assessed against recommended servings and nutrient intakes from Australian Dietary Guidelines and International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes (ISPAD) Nutritional Guidelines. Results: Diet was evaluated in 478 questionnaires. Diet composition did not differ between T1D and controls, and both groups did not meet the majority of the Australian Dietary Guidelines, except for fruit intake. The majority of T1D children and controls (80-83%) were overconsuming sodium (2837 AE 848 mg/day), discretionary foods (5.9 AE 2.5 serves/day) and saturated fat and trans fatty acids (13.1 AE 2.7% of total daily energy intake) in comparison with Australian and ISPAD guidelines. A total of 84% of T1D children and controls achieved the recommended intake of fibre (34.4 AE 11.0 g/day). Longitudinal analysis in children with T1D showed that total daily energy, macronutrient, micronutrient and food group servings intake did not change over the 12 months. Overconsumption of sodium, discretionary foods and saturated fat persisted over the 12-month study period. Conclusions: The majority of Australian children, with and without T1D, is not meeting recommended dietary guidelines. Significant overconsumption of sodium, saturated fat and discretionary foods attracts the most concern.

Background/Objectives: Infantile haemangiomas (IH) are common benign tumours of childhood. The current guideline recommended treatment is oral propranolol, the use of which for IH is relatively recent and there are no safety audits in Australian children published. As a result, it is a primarily inpatient initiated treatment. The aim of this study was to examine the short-term complication rates in infants treated with oral propranolol for IH. Methods:Retrospective case note review of IH patients initiated on oral propranolol admitted to the day-unit of tertiary metropolitan hospital in an Australia capital city, from January 2016 to December 2019.Results: Overall, 72 children were included in the study. Mean age at time of admission was 3.8 ± 2 months. Eight patients (11.1%) experienced complications during their initiation admission. Pulmonary complications (oxygen desaturation, wheeze, increased respiratory rate) was the most common type. No children required high-dependency or intensive care unit admission. The children who experienced complications had a mean age of 2.4 ± 1.2 months; t-test of equality of means found a relationship between propranolol-associated complication rate and age (p = 0.007). All other patient or admission characteristics were not associated with complication events (all p > 0.05). Conclusions:Propranolol is a safe, effective and well-tolerated treatment in Australian children with IH. This study demonstrates younger infants will most likely benefit from inpatient initiation. More research needs to be done to characterise the risk profile of propranolol initiation for IH.