RESUMOEm sistemas de produção agrícola que utilizam a irrigação, uma das principais causas da variabilidade dos rendimentos, a disponibilidade de água para as culturas, é controlada. Nesse caso, outros fatores limitantes ao rendimento, relacionados a atributos de solo, passam a ter sua importância aumentada. Com o objetivo de investigar a variabilidade espacial dos principais atributos químicos e do rendimento de culturas, além de determinar os atributos químicos e físico-hídricos do solo em diferentes zonas de rendimento, foram analisadas duas áreas comerciais irrigadas por pivô central, com 51,8 e 58,2 ha, localizadas, respectivamente, em Trindade do Sul (TS) e Palmeira das Missões (PM), no Rio Grande do Sul (RS). As amostragens para caracterização dos atributos químicos foram georreferenciadas seguindo uma malha regular de 100 x 100 m, na camada de 0-0,10 m. Já para investigar a relação entre os atributos químicos e físico-hídricos do solo com os rendimentos obtidos, dada a extensão das áreas, três zonas com distinto potencial produtivo foram estabelecidas, utilizando os mapas de rendimento disponíveis (safras de feijão

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

The spatial variability of soil organic matter, plant water availability, and soil nitrogen (N) availability are drivers of crop response to mineral N fertilizer. The complex interaction of these factors is responsible for within-field corn and wheat yield variability. The hairy vetch (HV) cover crop is an economic, environmentally friendly, and efficient N source capable of conciliating crop yield and soil health. Nevertheless, the HV effects to mitigate yield gap of management zone (MZ) have not yet been documented. This study evaluated the effects of HV and mineral N fertilization, in single or combined input, on alleviating crop yield gap. The study was carried out in two croplands southern Brazil. The experimental design was a complete randomized block in a split plot having MZ (high, medium, and low yield) and N fertilizer rates.Wheat and corn N uptake and grain yield had a quadratic adjustment with N fertilizer input, but there was a significant MZ effect, where low yield zone (LYZ) was less responsive. Consequently, mineral N fertilization as a single input to mitigate the yield gap in this MZ was not efficient. On the other hand, HV increased corn N uptake and grain yield mainly in LYZ compared to MYZ and HYZ. HV fully mitigated the yield gap between MYZ and HYZ. The combined use of HV and mineral N fertilization rate adjusted according to N legume credit and MZ was an efficient strategy to boost yield, favoring soil health and environmental protection.