BackgroundPhylogenetic tree comparison metrics are an important tool in the study of evolution, and hence the definition of such metrics is an interesting problem in phylogenetics. In a paper in Taxon fifty years ago, Sokal and Rohlf proposed to measure quantitatively the difference between a pair of phylogenetic trees by first encoding them by means of their half-matrices of cophenetic values, and then comparing these matrices. This idea has been used several times since then to define dissimilarity measures between phylogenetic trees but, to our knowledge, no proper metric on weighted phylogenetic trees with nested taxa based on this idea has been formally defined and studied yet. Actually, the cophenetic values of pairs of different taxa alone are not enough to single out phylogenetic trees with weighted arcs or nested taxa.ResultsFor every (rooted) phylogenetic tree T, let its cophenetic vectorφ(T) consist of all pairs of cophenetic values between pairs of taxa in T and all depths of taxa in T. It turns out that these cophenetic vectors single out weighted phylogenetic trees with nested taxa. We then define a family of cophenetic metrics dφ,p by comparing these cophenetic vectors by means of Lp norms, and we study, either analytically or numerically, some of their basic properties: neighbors, diameter, distribution, and their rank correlation with each other and with other metrics.ConclusionsThe cophenetic metrics can be safely used on weighted phylogenetic trees with nested taxa and no restriction on degrees, and they can be computed in O(n2) time, where n stands for the number of taxa. The metrics dφ,1 and dφ,2 have positive skewed distributions, and they show a low rank correlation with the Robinson-Foulds metric and the nodal metrics, and a very high correlation with each other and with the splitted nodal metrics. The diameter of dφ,p, for p⩾1 , is in O(n(p+2)/p), and thus for low p they are more discriminative, having a wider range of values.

The Colless index is one of the most popular and natural balance indices for bifurcating phylogenetic trees, but it makes no sense for multifurcating trees. In this paper we propose a family of Colless-like balance indices that generalize the Colless index to multifurcating phylogenetic trees. Each is determined by the choice of a dissimilarity D and a weight function . A balance index is sound when the most balanced phylogenetic trees according to it are exactly the fully symmetric ones. Unfortunately, not every Colless-like balance index is sound in this sense. We prove then that taking f(n) = ln(n + e) or f(n) = en as weight functions, the resulting index is sound for every dissimilarity D. Next, for each one of these two functions f and for three popular dissimilarities D (the variance, the standard deviation, and the mean deviation from the median), we find the most unbalanced phylogenetic trees according to with any given number n of leaves. The results show that the growth pace of the function f influences the notion of “balance” measured by the indices it defines. Finally, we introduce our R package “CollessLike,” which, among other functionalities, allows the computation of Colless-like indices of trees and their comparison to their distribution under Chen-Ford-Winkel’s α-γ-model for multifurcating phylogenetic trees. As an application, we show that the trees in TreeBASE do not seem to follow either the uniform model for multifurcating trees or the α-γ-model, for any values of α and γ.

Background. The Sackin index S of a rooted phylogenetic tree, defined as the sum of its leaves' depths, is one of the most popular balance indices in phylogenetics, and Sackin's 1972 paper is usually cited as the source for this index. However, what Sackin actually proposed in his paper as a measure of the imbalance of a rooted tree was not the sum of its leaves' depths, but their ``variation''. This proposal was later implemented as the variance of the leaves' depths by Kirkpatrick and Slatkin in 1993, where they also posed the problem of finding a closed formula for its expected value under the Yule model. Nowadays, Sackin's original proposal seems to have passed into oblivion in the phylogenetics literature, replaced by the index bearing his name, which, in fact, was introduced a decade later by Sokal. Results. In this paper we study the properties of the variance of the leaves' depths, V, as a balance index. Firstly, we prove that the rooted trees with $n$ leaves and maximum V value are exactly the combs with n leaves. But although V achieves its minimum value on every space of bifurcating rooted phylogenetic trees with at most 183 leaves at the so-called ``maximally balanced trees'' with n leaves, this property fails for almost every n larger than 184 We provide then an algorithm that finds the bifurcating rooted trees with n leaves and minimum V value in quasilinear time. Secondly, we obtain closed formulas for the expected V value of a bifurcating rooted tree with any number n of leaves under the Yule and the uniform models and, as a by-product of the computations leading to these formulas, we also obtain closed formulas for the variance under the uniform model of the Sackin index and the total cophenetic index of a bifurcating rooted tree, as well as of their covariance, thus filling this gap in the literature.

Background: The Sackin index S of a rooted phylogenetic tree, defined as the sum of its leaves' depths, is one of the most popular balance indices in phylogenetics, and Sackin's paper (Syst Zool 21:225-6, 1972) is usually cited as the source for this index. However, what Sackin actually proposed in his paper as a measure of the imbalance of a rooted tree was not the sum of its leaves' depths, but their "variation". This proposal was later implemented as the variance of the leaves' depths by Kirkpatrick and Slatkin in (Evolution 47:1171-81, 1993), where they also posed the problem of finding a closed formula for its expected value under the Yule model. Nowadays, Sackin's original proposal seems to have passed into oblivion in the phylogenetics literature, replaced by the index bearing his name, which, in fact, was introduced a decade later by Sokal. Results: In this paper we study the properties of the variance of the leaves' depths, V, as a balance index. Firstly, we prove that the rooted trees with n leaves and maximum V value are exactly the combs with n leaves. But although V achieves its minimum value on every space BT n of bifurcating rooted phylogenetic trees with n ≤ 183 leaves at the so-called "maximally balanced trees" with n leaves, this property fails for almost every n ≥ 184. We provide then an algorithm that finds the trees in BT n with minimum V value in time O(n log(n)). Secondly, we obtain closed formulas for the expected V value of a bifurcating rooted tree with any number n of leaves under the Yule and the uniform models and, as a by-product of the computations leading to these formulas, we also obtain closed formulas for the variance under the uniform model of the Sackin index and the total cophenetic index (Mir et al., Math Biosci 241:125-36, 2013) of a bifurcating rooted tree, as well as of their covariance, thus filling this gap in the literature. Conclusion: The phylogenetics community has been wise in preferring the sum S(T) of the leaves' depths of a phylogenetic tree T over their variance V(T) as a balance index, because the latter does not seem to capture correctly the notion of balance of large bifurcating rooted trees. But it is still a valid and useful shape index.

No abstract