BackgroundCachexia is a metabolic syndrome that affects up to 50–80% of cancer patients. The pathophysiology is characterized by a variable combination of reduced food intake and abnormal metabolism, including systemic inflammation and negative protein and energy balance. Despite its high clinical significance, defined diagnostic criteria and established therapeutic strategies are lacking. The ‘omics’ technologies provide a global view of biological systems. We hypothesize that blood‐based metabolomics might identify findings in cachectic patients that could provide clues to gain knowledge on its pathophysiology, and eventually postulate new therapeutic strategies.MethodsThis is a cross‐sectional observational study in two cohorts of cancer patients, with and without cachexia. Patients were consecutively recruited from routine clinical practice of a General Oncology Department at ‘12 de Octubre’ University Hospital. Selected clinical and biochemical features were collected. Blood metabolite fingerprinting was performed using three analytical platforms, gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC–MS), capillary electrophoresis coupled to mass spectrometry (CE–MS), and liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (LC–MS). Besides, we performed pathway‐based metabolite analyses to obtain more information on biological functions.ResultsA total of 15 subjects were included in this study, 8 cachectic and 7 non‐cachectic patients. Metabolomic analyses were able to correctly classify their samples in 80% (GC–MS), 97% (CE–MS), 96% [LC–MS (positive mode)], and 89% [LC–MS (negative mode)] of the cases. The most prominent metabolic alteration in plasma of cachectic patients was the decrease of amino acids and derivatives [especially arginine, tryptophan, indolelactic acid, and threonine, with 0.4‐fold change (FC) compared with non‐cachectic patients], along with the reduction of glycerophospholipids [mainly lysophosphatidylcholines(O‐16:0) and lysophosphatidylcholines(20:3) sn‐1, FC = 0.1] and sphingolipids [SM(d30:0), FC = 0.5]. The metabolite with the highest increase was cortisol (FC = 1.6). Such alterations suggest a role of the following metabolic pathways in the pathophysiology of cancer cachexia: arginine and proline metabolism; alanine, aspartate, and glutamate metabolism; phenylalanine metabolism; lysine degradation; aminoacyl‐tRNA biosynthesis; fatty acid elongation in mitochondria; tricarboxylic acids cycle; among others.ConclusionsThese findings suggest that plasma amino acids and lipids profiling has great potential to find the mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of cachexia. Metabolic profiling of plasma from cancer patients show differences between cachexia and non‐cachexia in amino acids and lipids that might be related to mechanisms involved in its pathophysiology. A better understanding of these mechanisms might identify novel therapeutic approaches to palliate this unmet medical condition.

COL1A1-PDGFB gene fusion uterine sarcoma is a recently described entity which shows some overlapping features with dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. To date, only 4 cases have been reported in the literature. Due to its rarity, succinct clinicopathologic characteristics are yet to be established. We report a fifth case initially mistaken as a uterine fibroid which histologically proved to be a CD34+ high-grade spindle cell proliferation which on fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis displayed COL1A1-PDGFB gene rearrangement. With this case description we hope to raise awareness and aid in the characterization of this emerging entity.

BackgroundCisplatin is a potent antitumor agent. However, toxicity and primary and secondary resistance are major limitations of cisplatin-based chemotherapy, leading to therapeutic failure. We have previously reported that mono-sulfonamide platinum complexes have good antitumor activity against different tumoral cell lines and with a different and better cytotoxic profile than cisplatin. Besides, N-sulfonamides have been used extensively in medicinal chemistry as bactericides, anticonvulsant, inhibitors of the carbonic anhydrase, inhibitors of histone deacetylases, and inhibitors of microtubule polymerization, among others.MethodsWe aimed to compare the cytotoxic effects of cisplatin and a trans-sulfonamide-platinum-complex (TSPC), in two human melanoma cell lines that differ in their TP53 status: SK-MEL-5, TP53 wild type, and SK-MEL-28, TP53 mutated. We performed cytotoxicity assays with both drugs, alone and in combination, cell cycle analyses, western blotting and immunoprecipitation, and fluorescence immunocytochemistry.ResultsTSPC had similar antiproliferative activity than cisplatin against SK-MEL-5 (3.24 ± 1.08 vs 2.89 ± 1.12 μM) and higher against SK-MEL-28 cells (5.83 ± 1.06 vs 10.17 ± 1.29 μM). Combination of both drugs inhibited proliferation in both cell lines, being especially important in SK-MEL-28, and showing a synergistic effect. In contrast to cisplatin, TSPC caused G1 instead G2/M arrest in both cell lines. Our present findings indicate that the G1 arrest is associated with the induction of CDKN1A and CDKN1B proteins, and that this response is also present in melanoma cells containing TP53 mutated. Also, strong accumulation of CDKN1A and CDKN1B in cells nuclei was seen upon TSPC treatment in both cell lines.ConclusionsOverall, these findings provide a new promising TSPC compound with in vitro antitumor activity against melanoma cell lines, and with a different mechanism of action from that of cisplatin. Besides, TSPC synergism with cisplatin facilitates its potential use for co-treatment to reduce toxicity and resistance against cisplatin. TSPC remains a promising lead compound for the generation of novel antineoplastic agent and to explore its synergism with other DNA damaging agents.

No abstract

Result(s)* In total 283 patients were included, 185 were classified as NOP while 98 as OP. No differences were found in disease characteristics. Laparoscopy was performed in 82% of patients. Both pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy were performed more frequently in NOP than in OP (56,8% vs. 36,7%; p<0,01 and 45,9 vs. 22,9%; p<0,01). Rates of intra-operative (6,5% vs 12,4%, p=0,12) and post-operative (13,5% vs 20,6% p=0,13) complications were similar between NOP and OP respectively, as well as the severity of complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification (4,4% vs 7,4% grade III, 0,5% vs 0% grade IV, p=0,51). No differences were found in other surgical and post-operative variables. The 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate was lower in OP (66,9% vs 86,0%, p=0,02). When analyzing only patients who underwent complete staging surgery (107 of the NOP and 35 of the OP), no differences were found in perioperative complications rate. In this subgroup, there were no differences in DSS between NOP and OP (78,1% vs 71,0%, p=0,64). Conclusion* OP do not present a higher rate of perioperative complications compared to NOP. However, they underwent less lymphadenectomies and presented poorer DSS. Considering only patients in whom complete surgery was performed, OP presented similar DSS to NOP, without presenting a higher rate of perioperative complications.