The strut-and-tie model (STM) is currently established as the best approach for pile cap design. This model leads to efficient estimations of the main reinforcement placed in strips between piles. However, good practices and some international Concrete Design Standards recommend some secondary distributed reinforcement, and even vertical stirrups that are not considered by the STM. An experimental campaign with nine three-pile caps tested by a centered load is presented to show the influence of both secondary reinforcement and the shear spandepth ratio on pile cap strength. The experimental results show a potential redistribution of internal forces in pile caps after yielding of main reinforcement, finally collapsed due to punching. Secondary reinforcement proves efficient to enhance pile cap strength since it takes part in complementary resistance mechanisms. As expected, the failure load increases with shear span-depth ratio reduction. The STM neither captures the effect of this ratio nor considers punching failure. Checking this failure mode is also required for pile caps. The punching formulation of Eurocode 2 allows considering the influence of this ratio, but some interpretation is required whether one deals with pile caps, regarding the effective width of the shear enhancement factor and the definition of the basic control perimeter. A proper definition would prevent unsafe or very conservative results. Therefore, some recommendations for the verification of deep pile caps following the Eurocode 2 are presented. The contribution of vertical stirrups as punching reinforcement is also investigated. The proposed approach is applied to the existing experimental database of three-and four-pile caps to check formulation validity, and conservative predictions with low coefficient of variation are reached.
Pile caps are rigid reinforced concrete structures that transfer column loads, generally consisting of a combination of an axial load and bending moments in one or two directions, to the piles. The design formulations of pile caps for more than two piles were derived from the results of experimental tests under a centered load. The practice of checking both punching and shear failure modes is common as described in the literature review, even thoughdespite these formulations were developed for more slender elements.Currently, Codes ACI 318-14 and EC2 allow designing pile caps with strut-and-tie models or sectional approaches (shear, punching and flexural designs).In this study, 21 full-scale pile caps with different shear span-depth ratios and reinforcement layouts were studied to investigate the effect of eccentric loading on the strength and accuracy of the code formulations. The results show that in eccentrically loaded pile caps, the ultimate load is reduced but the maximum pile reaction increases and the secondary reinforcement proves effective to enhance the pile cap strength.Although the strut-and-tie models (STM) allow eccentric loads to be taken into consideration, they predict a much lower peak load than that observed at the experimental results and do not adequately reflect either the influence of slenderness or the failure mode.In general the sectional approach provided by Codes ACI-318-14, EC2 and MC-2010 (Level I of Approximation) lead to safe predictions of the peak load but do not always correctly predict the failure mode. The ultimate load predicted by EC-2 formulation comes closest to the experimental peak load, accurately reflects the influence of slenderness and the effect of secondary reinforcement, however, additional assumptions need to be made for its application. The ACI formulation complemented by the CRSI-Definición de estilo: Título 1
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.