No abstract

Objectives To evaluate the short-and medium-term results of prostatic arterial embolisation (PAE) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods This was a prospective non-randomised study including 255 patients diagnosed with BPH and moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms after failure of medical treatment for at least 6 months. The patients underwent PAE between March 2009 and April 2012. Technical success is when selective prostatic arterial embolisation is completed in at least one pelvic side. Clinical success was defined as improving symptoms and quality of life. Evaluation was performed before PAE and at 1, 3, 6 and every 6 months thereafter with the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), uroflowmetry, prostatic specific antigen (PSA) and volume. Non-spherical polyvinyl alcohol particles were used. Results PAE was technically successful in 250 patients (97.9 %). Mean follow-up, in 238 patients, was 10 months (range 1-36). Cumulative rates of clinical success were 81.9 %, 80.7 %, 77.9 %, 75.2 %, 72.0 %, 72.0 %, 72.0 % and 72.0 % at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months, respectively. There was one major complication. Conclusions PAE is a procedure with good results for BPH patients with moderate to severe LUTS after failure of medical therapy. Key Points • Prostatic artery embolisation offers minimally invasive therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia.• Prostatic artery embolisation is a challenging procedure because of vascular anatomical variations.• PAE is a promising new technique that has shown good results.

Purpose: To describe the anatomy and imaging findings of the prostatic arteries (PAs) on multirow-detector pelvic computed tomographic (CT) angiography and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) before embolization for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Materials and Methods:In a retrospective study from May 2010 to June 2011, 75 men (150 pelvic sides) underwent pelvic CT angiography and selective pelvic DSA before PA embolization for BPH. Each pelvic side was evaluated regarding the number of independent PAs and their origin, trajectory, termination, and anastomoses with adjacent arteries.

PAE is a safe and effective procedure, with low morbidity, no sexual dysfunction, and good short- and intermediate-term symptomatic control associated with prostate volume reduction.

Purpose To assess predictors of outcome after prostate artery embolization (PAE) for benign prostatic hyperplasia with spherical particle polyvinyl alcohol (sPVA) and compare outcomes with the use of nonspherical particle polyvinyl alcohol (nsPVA). Materials and Methods This was a single-center retrospective institutional review board-approved study conducted from 2009 to 2015 in patients undergoing PAE with sPVA (n = 186; mean age ± standard deviation, 65.5 years ± 7.7) and nsPVA (n = 300; mean age, 65.3 years ± 7.6). The two cohorts were compared and analyzed for predictors of outcome with a Cox proportional hazards model and linear regression. Post-PAE prostate ischemia was measured with contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in 23 patients with nsPVA and 25 patients with sPVA. The 24-hour post-PAE prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was registered in 133 patients with sPVA. Prognostic values of MR imaging and PSA levels 24 hours after PAE were assessed with Cox and random-effects regressions. Results Predictors of clinical failure were older age (age over 65 years, P = .002), unilateral procedure (P = .002), and higher baseline International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS, P = .033). Adjusted hazard ratio for clinical failure of sPVA was 1.273 (P = .16). Acute urinary retention was a predictor of lower IPSS after PAE (P = .002). The mean proportion of prostate ischemia was 11% with sPVA and 10% with nsPVA (P = .65). Lower IPSS after PAE was associated with a higher proportion of prostate ischemia (P = .009). Patients with a PSA level of at least 75 ng/mL (75 μg/L) 24 hours after PAE had a greater decrease in IPSS (P = .01). Prostate ischemic volume and PSA level 24 hours after PAE were correlated (Pearson r = 0.64, P = .014). Conclusion Clinical outcome was similar after PAE with sPVA and nsPVA. Younger age (up to 65 years), bilateral PAE, lower baseline IPSS, and acute urinary retention were predictors of better clinical outcome. The PSA level 24 hours after PAE correlated with prostate ischemia, and both correlated with clinical outcome. (©) RSNA, 2016.