Radiation Risks and the Importance of Radiological Protection in Interventional Cardiology: A Systematic ReviewWe discuss some aspects related to the legal framework, international recommendations and training programs on radiological protection; image quality and equipment; the biological effects and risks of ionizing radiation; lesions in patients and operators; patient's reference levels; occupational dose limit and preventive actions. The use of ionizing radiation involves risks that are justified in diagnostic and therapeu tic procedures. The awareness and knowledge of these risks minimizes the damage, optimizing the quality of images and safe use of ionizing radiation. There is evidence of radiationin duced cataracts in individuals who work in catheterization laboratories. Several studies suggest there may be a significant risk of lens opacity, if radiological protection devices are not properly used. Additionally, these interventional procedures are performed in Latin America, usually by medical specialists in collaboration with nurses, technologists and technicians, who often do not have adequate training in radiological protection.
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the equivalent and effective doses of different digital radiographic methods (panoramic, lateral cephalometric and periapical) with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: Precalibrated thermoluminescent dosimeters were placed at 24 locations in an anthropomorphic phantom (Alderson Rando Phantom, Alderson Research Laboratories, New York, NY, USA), representing a medium sized adult. The following devices were tested: Heliodent Plus (Sirona Dental Systems, Bernsheim, Germany), Orthophos XG 5 (Sirona Dental Systems, Bernsheim, Germany) and i-CAT (Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, PA, USA). The equivalent doses and effective doses were calculated considering the recommendations of the International Commission of Radiological Protection (ICRP) issued in 1990 and 2007. Results: Although the effective dose of the radiographic set corresponded to 17.5% (ICRP 1990) and 47.2% (ICRP 2007) of the CBCT dose, the equivalent doses of skin, bone surface and muscle obtained by the radiographic set were higher when compared to CBCT. However, in some areas, the radiation produced by the orthodontic set was higher due to the complete periapical examination. Conclusion: Considering the optimization principle of radiation protection, i-CAT tomography should be used only in specific and justified circumstances. Additionally, following the ALARA principle, single periapical radiographies covering restricted areas are more suitable than the complete periapical examination.
Analisamos o produto dose-área ("dose area product" - DAP) de 12 pacientes submetidos a videofluoroscopia da deglutição. O objetivo foi estimar a exposição à radiação produzida neste tipo de estudo. Utilizamos medidor de DAP (PTW-Diamentor), que registra, de modo cumulativo, as doses de radiação que atingem o examinado durante todo o procedimento. Obtivemos nossos dados em duas salas dotadas com equipamentos da mesma marca e modelo. O protocolo, rigorosamente o mesmo, foi efetuado por um único e experiente profissional. Os valores do DAP para o estudo da deglutição em três fases (oral, faríngea e esofágica) foram: sala 1 (sete pacientes) - 4.101 cGy.cm² de DAP médio com 577 cGy.cm²/min.; sala 2 (cinco pacientes) - 804 cGy.cm² de DAP médio com 119 cGy.cm²/min. Estes resultados díspares foram obtidos de indivíduos com média de 1,57 m de altura e 56 kg de peso, em protocolo que se cumpriu em cerca de sete minutos. Concluímos que as doses, cinco vezes mais baixas, obtidas na sala 2, retratam mais adequadamente a exposição determinada pela videofluoroscopia da deglutição. Acreditamos que as doses mais altas, da sala 1, embora dentro dos padrões internacionais para exames do tubo digestivo, devam-se ao desconhecimento do desempenho, nem sempre perfeito, dos equipamentos radiológicos. Esta conclusão encontra apoio no fato de, em nosso meio, não ser usual que os serviços de radiodiagnóstico tenham implementado um rotineiro "programa de garantia de qualidade" e aponta para a importância do DAP na qualificação dos métodos e equipamentos radiológicos.
The purpose of this paper is to report a set of experimental values of patient and staff doses in a cardiac catheterisation laboratory using the range of radiographic and geometric parameters from routine clinical practice. The data obtained will be available for validation of Monte Carlo calculations and for training purposes. They will also help optimise radiation protection for patients and staff. Experimental measurements were made with an anthropomorphic phantom, and a monoplane flat detector-based X-ray system was used for interventional cardiology procedures. Standard operational protocols used in clinical practice were applied. Around 1000 patient dose and 5000 staff dose values were measured for different operational conditions (angulations, distances, collimation and wedge filter, magnification, phantom thicknesses, using Copper absorber, etc.). Uncertainties were also estimated. Increase factors of 3-10 for patients and staff doses were measured for the different C-arm angulations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.