BACKGROUND In 1991, the Italian Association for Pediatric Hematology‐Oncology and the National Council of Research (CNR) initiated an Italian Cooperative Study (SE 91‐CNR Protocol) with the main objective of improving the overall survival (SUR) and the event free survival (EFS) of children and young adults with localized Ewing sarcoma and primitive neuroectodermal tumors of bone compared with a previous study (IOR/Ew2 Protocol). METHODS Between November 1991 and November 1997, 165 patients were enrolled in this study, 160 of whom were evaluable. The patients were treated with a multimodal approach characterized by intensified chemotherapy, hyperfractionated and accelerated radiation therapy, and the addition of ifosfamide and etoposide to standard chemotherapy with vincristine, actinomycin‐D, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide. RESULTS After a median follow‐up of 37 months, 126 of the 160 evaluable patients remained free of disease recurrence. Thirty‐one patients developed a disease recurrence (20 with disseminated disease). CONCLUSIONS The 3‐year SUR and EFS rates found in the current study (83.6% and 77.8%, respectively) may be considered satisfactory. Only age at diagnosis ≤14 years and a good histologic response appeared to affect the outcome of patients with localized Ewing sarcoma positively. These results appear to demonstrate the efficacy of the addition of ifosfamide in induction chemotherapy to four‐drug standard combination chemotherapy, as confirmed by the improved outcome in terms of 3‐year EFS reported in the SE 91‐CNR Protocol compared with the IOR/Ew2 Protocol (77.8% vs. 60.7%). In addition, the better outcome also could be explained by the change in treatment strategy with a trend toward the use of more surgery than radiation therapy compared with the authors' previous protocol. Cancer 1999;86:421–8. © 1999 American Cancer Society.
BackgroundCHEK2 is a multi-cancer susceptibility gene whose common germline mutations are known to contribute to the risk of developing breast and prostate cancer.Case presentationHere, we describe an Italian family with a high number of cases of breast cancer and other types of tumour subjected to the MLPA test to verify the presence of BRCA1, BRCA2 and CHEK2 deletions and duplications. We identified a new 23-kb duplication in the CHEK2 gene extending from intron 5 to 13 that was associated with breast cancer in the family. The presence and localisation of the alteration was confirmed by a second analysis by Next-Generation Sequencing.ConclusionsThis finding suggests that CHEK2 mutations are heterogeneous and that techniques other than sequencing, such as MLPA, are needed to identify CHEK2 mutations. It also indicates that CHEK2 rare variants, such as duplications, can confer a high susceptibility to cancer development and should thus be studied in depth as most of our knowledge of CHEK2 concerns common mutations.
What constitutes an adequate surgical margin in partial mastectomy is still controversial: intra-operative specimen radiogram is commonly used during partial mastectomy for nonpalpable lesions in order verify the adequacy of the resection but what margin is to be considered “adequate” is still debatable.An intraoperative specimen mammogram was performed during all consecutive conservative resections for nonpalpable DCIS and a 15-mm radiological margin was considered “adequate”. Margins were pathologically assessed and classified as “negative”, “close” or “positive” and the rate of margin involvement constitued the main outcome of the study.Among 272 conservative interventions, 80.51% had negative margins at final pathology, 3.31% had close margins and 16.18% had positive margins.An intraoperative “adequate” margin of 15 mm as defined on intraoperative specimen mammogram granted a high rate of histologically negative margin at primary surgery; this finding was paralleled by confirmation of the treatment as conservative in 95% of cases.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2193-1801-2-243) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a highly heterogenous tumor that is now more frequently diagnosed because of the increased number of screening programs. Women with DCIS are mainly treated with conservative surgery almost always followed by radiotherapy. Although conventional biomarkers, i.e. ER, PgR, Ki67, and HER2, have been extensively investigated in invasive tumors, little is known about their role in DCIS, especially that of the androgen receptor (AR). In the present study, the expression of conventional biomarkers and AR was determined by immunohistochemistry in 85 DCIS samples from patients monitored for a maximum of 13 years: 43 patients were treated with quadrantectomy and 42 patients underwent quadrantectomy and radiotherapy. Of these, 5 and 11 patients relapsed, respectively. Our findings showed that ER and PgR were higher in nonrelapsed than in relapsed patients (P=0.025 and 0.0038). In contrast, AR expression and the AR/ER ratio were higher in relapsed patients than in the nonrelapsed group (P=0.0069 and 0.0012). At the best cut-off value of 1.1, the AR/ER ratio showed an overall accuracy of 92% and 80% in predicting in situ relapse or progression to invasive carcinoma in DCIS patients treated with surgery and those treated with surgery plus radiotherapy, respectively. AR would therefore appear to be an independent prognostic biomarker in the latter group. Our preliminary results highlight the potentially important role of the AR/ER ratio as a predictive indicator of DCIS relapse, independently of treatment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.