A correlation between intraoperative pharynx/esophagus retraction and postoperative swallowing disturbances could not be confirmed. The cause of the prevalence of the female gender is unknown. However, the absence of impaired deglutition in the control group suggests that a local phenomenon must be causative of swallowing disturbances following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
Conventional lumbar microdiscectomy requires subperiosteal dissection of the muscular and tendineous insertions from the midline structures. This prospective, randomized, single center trial aimed to compare a blunt splitting transmuscular approach to the interlaminar window with the subperiosteal microsurgical technique. Two experienced surgeons performed first time lumbar microdiscectomy on 125 patients. The type of approach and retractor used was randomized and both patients and evaluator were blinded to it. In 59 patients a speculumcounter-retractor was inserted through a subperiosteal (SP) route and in 66 patients an expandable tubular retractor was introduced via a transmuscular (TM) approach. In both groups the mean age was 51 years, the male gender prevalent (61%) and the distribution of the operated levels was similar. The outcome measures were VAS for back and leg pain, ODI and the postoperative analgesic consumption was scored by the WHO 3-class protocol. A postsurgical VAS (0-1) was defined as excellent, VAS (2-4) as satisfactory result. In this study the patients scored from 1 to 3 points daily according to the class of drugs taken.Furthermore, a 1/3 point (class 1), 2/3 point (class 2) and 1 point (class 3) was added for each on-demand drug intake. Recovery from radicular pain was excellent (SP 68%, TM 76%) or satisfactory (SP 23%, TM 21%). Recovery from back pain was excellent (SP 58%, TM 59%) or satisfactory (SP 37%, TM 37%). Postoperative mean improvement ODI was: SP 29% and TM 31%. Postoperative mean analgesic intake: SP 4.8 points, TM 2.6 points (P = 0.03). Lumbar microdiscectomy improves pain and ODI irrespective of the type of approach and retractor used. However, the postsurgical analgesic consumption is significantly less if a tubular retractor is inserted via a transmuscular approach.
Introduction Incidental durotomy (ID) is the most common complication of spine surgery. Revision procedures, ossification of the yellow ligament, or synovial cysts are well-known risk factors. The size, shape, and severity of ID are unpredictable, ranging from a pinpoint hole to a several centimeters large dural laceration with transected fibers following the slippage of a cutting burr. Furthermore, the occurrence of ID is always unexpected. Intra-operative management is often based on a steep learning curve rather than a structured scheme. Purpose To provide an intra-operative ten-step closure technique (10ST) for IDs of varying severity. Methods A database of 4020 consecutive surgeries for lumbar degenerative disease over the past 4 years was searched for ID. The records of 176 patients were analyzed. Two dural repair techniques were compared: the ''individual'' technique (InT) and the 10ST. Results The overall prevalence of ID was 4.4 %. The prevalence was lowest in virgin micro-discectomies (1.7 %) and ranged from 3.6 % in decompression for spinal canal stenosis up to 14.5 % in revision procedures. All surgeries were performed with the aid of a microscope. Among 107 primary surgeries, the InT achieved a singlestage closure of the ID in 96 procedures (89.7 %). Among 20 virgin surgeries, the 10ST was successful in all cases (P = 0.21). Among 42 re-do procedures following failed attempts to stop cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, the InT achieved single-stage closure in 36 procedures (85.7 %). The 10ST was successful in all 26 cases (P = 0.03). The follow-up was 1 year. Conclusions The 10ST should be considered for successful single-stage closure in primary repair of ID.
Early postoperative dysphagia after anterior cervical surgery is a well-known phenomenon with so far unknown etiology. We hypothesised that direct pressure induced by the medial retractor blade on pharynx/esophagus mucosal wall leads to local ischemia. Subsequently postoperative hyperemia and swelling of the pharynx/esophagus may result in swallowing disturbance. To prove the hypothesis local blood flow inside the pharynx/esophagus wall during anterior cervical surgery was measured using a laser Doppler (LD) perfusion monitor unit. Fifteen patients underwent standard anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). The LD probe was placed underneath the medial retractor blade in order to gain information at the maximum point of pressure applied onto the pharynx/esophagus wall. Local perfusion was measured prior to retractor opening (5 min), during spreading of the retractor and after its closure (5 min). Perfusion was measured semiquantitatively in perfusion units (PU). Local perfusion ranged from 30 to 210 PU (mean 107) prior to retractor opening, from 7 to 60 PU (mean 30) with open retractor and from 15 to 280 PU (mean 117) after retractor closure. In all 15 patients the open retractor led to hypoperfusion ranging from 21 to 93% compared to the baseline level. In seven patients a reactive hyperemia at the end of the procedure was detected (32-89% compared to baseline level). In four patients after hypoperfusion during spreading of the retractor the baseline levels were reached again and in four patients perfusion remained diminished even after retractor closure. To best of our knowledge, this is the first report on intraoperative measurement of local perfusion of the pharynx/esophagus wall during anterior cervical surgery. Diminished local perfusion was observed in all patients during spreading of the retractor and post-procedure hyperemia was recorded in 46% of the patients. The local ischemia of the pharynx/esophagus wall may be a crucial step in the development of postoperative dysphagia.
The translaminar approach is recommended in disc herniations encroaching the exiting root, as an alternative to the conventional interlaminar route.
Temporary dysphagia after anterior cervical discectomy (ACD) is common. However, its mechanism is poorly understood. Pressure induced by retractor blades onto pharynx/esophagus were measured intraoperatively in order to gain more information regarding traumatization of the pharynx/esophagus wall. Thirty-one patients underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for degenerative disc disease. An online pressure transducer was applied to the rear side of the medial retractor blade (epi-esophageal-pressure, epi-P) and a cylindric, inflatable transducer was preoperatively inserted into the pharynx/esophagus under fluoroscopic guidance at the level to be operated on (endo-esophageal-pressure, endo-P). Pressure values were recorded continuously during the operation. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and endotracheal cuff pressure (ETCP) were recorded additionally. An in vitro model was developed in order to analyze the impact of the retractor blade design onto the epi-esophageal-pressure. Mean epi-P before and following adequate retractor opening for exposure of the disc space was 58.3 and 92.7 mmHg. Thirty, 60 and 90 min later the epi-P decreased to 79, 70 and 66%, respectively. Mean basal endo-P was 9.8 mmHg and increased to 20.6 mmHg after retractor placement. Thirty, 60 and 90 min later the endo-P decreased to 80, 71 and 62%, respectively. The mean MAP was 76 mmHg and the ECTP was adjusted to 25 mmHg during the procedures. In the in vitro model retraction pressure correlated inversely with the contact area between visceral wall and retractor blade. During ACDF the retraction pressure onto the pharyngeal/esophageal wall exceeds MAP and even more the mucosal perfusion pressure of 25 mmHg. Over time the pharynx/esophageal wall adapts to the applied pressure induced by the retractor blade. The contact area between them influences the retraction pressure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.