In this in vitro model, FTI and LSI predicted RF lesion dimensions, whereas power and CF did not. The LSI predictive value was higher than that of FTI. Steam pops occurred only using high ablation power levels, regardless of the targeted LSI.
In this first prospective study, LSI-guided PVI improved clinical outcome without any increase in complication rate when compared with standard, non-LSI-guided approach.
Background
Catheter‐delivered radiofrequency (RF) lesion formation is a complex phenomenon, and few studies have explored the effect of catheter orientation on lesion size and catheter orientation behavior during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) procedures. We evaluated the influence of catheter orientation on lesion dimensions in an in vitro experimental setting and investigated the catheter orientation behavior during PVI.
Methods and results
72 lesions were created in vitro on a porcine heart using a contact force catheter in a parallel, oblique, and perpendicular tip to tissue orientation. The superficial lesion length (SLL) increased shifting the catheter from perpendicular to parallel orientation. The intratissue absolute maximal lesion length (AML) was greater with an oblique catheter orientation. The lesion depth (LD) and the superficial lesion width (SLW) resulted similar with any orientation.
Data from 21 PVI procedures in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation using the “wide antral circumferential RF ablation” (WACA) technique were retrospectively analyzed. The mean contact angle among 1130 RF lesions was 28 ± 20°. A prevalent parallel orientation was noted in the anterior WACA segments, whereas it resulted more perpendicular in the posterior segments. Significant differences in catheter orientation between the three operators were found only in few WACA segments.
Conclusions
In an in vitro setting, catheter orientation affects SLL and AML, but not LD and SLW. During PVI procedures, catheter orientation resulted mostly parallel to the endocardium. Catheter orientation varied among different WACA segments, but only small differences were found between three operators when considering similar WACA segments.
AimTo evaluate Attain Performa (Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) quadripolar lead performance in clinical practice and, secondarily, to compare its long term clinical outcomes vs bipolar leads for left ventricular (LV) pacing.Methods and resultsWe retrospectively analyzed clinical, procedural and follow-up data of 215 patients implanted with a quadripolar lead. One hundred and twenty one patients implanted with bipolar lead were selected to compare long-term clinical outcomes. The quadripolar lead was implanted in the target vein in 196 patients (91%) without acute dislodgements. In 50% of patients the chosen final pacing configuration at implant would not have been available with bipolar leads. A dedicated quadripolar pacing vector was chosen more frequently when the LV tip location was apical than otherwise (65.6% vs 42.7%, p = 0.003). After a median follow-up of 14 months, the LV pacing threshold was less than 2.5 V at 0.4 ms in 98 patients (90%) with a safety margin between phrenic nerve and LV pacing threshold >3 V in 97 patients (89%). We observed a slight trend toward a lower risk of heart failure worsening and a lower incidence of ventricular arrhythmias and pulmonary congestion in patients implanted with quadripolar leads compared with the control group.ConclusionQuadripolar leads improve the management of phrenic nerve stimulation at no trade-off with pacing threshold and lead stability. Quadripolar leads seems to be associated with a lower incidence of VT/VF and pulmonary congestion, when compared with bipolar leads, but further investigations are necessary to confirm that this positive effect is associated with better LV reverse remodeling.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.