Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have been the subject of clinical trials for more than a generation, and the outcomes of advanced clinical trials have fallen short of expectations raised by encouraging pre-clinical animal data in a wide array of disease models. In this Perspective, important biological and pharmacological disparities in pre-clinical research and human translational studies are highlighted, and analyses of clinical trial failures and recent successes provide a rational pathway to MSC regulatory approval and deployment for disorders with unmet medical needs.
This phase I clinical trial evaluated the safety and clinical efficacy of adipose‐derived stromal cells (ASCs) in osteoarthritis. Eighteen patients with severe knee osteoarthritis were treated with a single intra‐articular injection of autologous ASCs at low (2 × 106 cells), medium (10 × 106), or high (50 × 106) doses (n = 6 each). After 6 months, no serious adverse events were reported, and patients treated with low‐dose ASCs significantly improved in pain and function.
Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) as a pharmaceutical for ailments characterized by pathogenic autoimmune, alloimmune and inflammatory processes now cover the spectrum of early- to late-phase clinical trials in both industry and academic sponsored studies. There is a broad consensus that despite different tissue sourcing and varied culture expansion protocols, human MSC-like cell products likely share fundamental mechanisms of action mediating their anti-inflammatory and tissue repair functionalities. Identification of functional markers of potency and reduction to practice of standardized, easily deployable methods of measurements of such would benefit the field. This would satisfy both mechanistic research as well as development of release potency assays to meet Regulatory Authority requirements for conduct of advanced clinical studies and their eventual registration. In response to this unmet need, the International Society for Cellular Therapy (ISCT) addressed the issue at an international workshop in May 2015 as part of the 21st ISCT annual meeting in Las Vegas. The scope of the workshop was focused on discussing potency assays germane to immunomodulation by MSC-like products in clinical indications targeting immune disorders. We here provide consensus perspective arising from this forum. We propose that focused analysis of selected MSC markers robustly deployed by in vitro licensing and metricized with a matrix of assays should be responsive to requirements from Regulatory Authorities. Workshop participants identified three preferred analytic methods that could inform a matrix assay approach: quantitative RNA analysis of selected gene products; flow cytometry analysis of functionally relevant surface markers and protein-based assay of secretome. We also advocate that potency assays acceptable to the Regulatory Authorities be rendered publicly accessible in an “open-access” manner, such as through publication or database collection.
IntroductionMesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are multipotent stem cells able to differentiate into mesoderm-derived cells, 1 and exhibit immunoregulatory properties. 2 MSCs have been used in the context of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation to improve hematopoietic engraftment, to prevent graft failure, and to reduce the incidence or severity of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). [3][4][5] MSCs obtained from bone marrow (BM) can undergo in vitro expansion in medium containing either fetal calf serum (FCS), with or without fibroblast growth factor (FGF-2), or platelet lysate (PL). 6 However, little is known about the effect of donor selection or culture conditions on the functional properties and therapeutic potential of clinical-grade MSCs.Recent studies have suggested that MSCs can contribute to tumor growth and metastasis. 7 A related concern is the capacity of MSCs for oncogenic transformation. Mouse MSCs show chromosomal abnormalities and are highly susceptible to transformation associated with an increased telomerase activity and myc expression, and a loss of p53 and p16. [8][9][10] In contrast, human MSCs are more resistant to transformation in vitro with no genomic instability detected and no tumor induced after long-term in vivo transfer. [11][12][13][14][15] After 20 to 50 population doublings (PDs), human MSCs undergo replicative senescence, with telomere shortening and increased p16 expression. 16 They require the same steps to achieve transformation as for differentiated cells, suggesting that they are not prone to spontaneous transformation. 17 Nevertheless, one recent study described the transformation of human adipose tissue-derived MSCs with up-regulation of myc, repression of p16, acquisition of telomerase activity, 18 and generation of carcinoma in mice. 19 We investigated the immune properties and resistance to transformation of MSCs produced in 4 cell therapy facilities during 2 multicenter clinical trials designed to evaluate the capacity of BM-MSCs to prevent acute GVHD or to treat irradiationinduced lesions. MethodsDetails regarding methods are provided in the supplemental data (available on the Blood website; see the Supplemental Materials link at the top of the online article). For personal use only. on March 28, 2019. by guest www.bloodjournal.org From (1A to 11A) were done for the GVHD prevention clinical trial, and 4 (12A, 13A2) to treat accidentally irradiated patients. For irradiated patients, 5 supplemental MSC productions (12B to 16B) were done using human PL. 6 MSC production Growth kinetics and MSC characterizationGrowth kinetics was assessed by studying total fold increase, total number of PDs, and colony-forming unit-fibroblast. MSCs were screened for the expression of CD45, CD73, CD105, CD90, and human leukocyte antigen-DR (HLA-DR) and were also checked for their capacity to stimulate the growth of allogeneic peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and to inhibit alloantigen-driven proliferation of PBMCs. Cytogenetic analysisAt the end of the first (P ...
We previously identified multipotent stem cells within the lamina propria of the human olfactory mucosa, located in the nasal cavity. We also demonstrated that this cell type differentiates into neural cells and improves locomotor behavior after transplantation in a rat model of Parkinson's disease. Yet, next to nothing is known about their specific stemness characteristics. We therefore devised a study aiming to compare olfactory lamina propria stem cells from 4 individuals to bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells from 4 age- and gender-matched individuals. Using pangenomic microarrays and immunostaining with 34 cell surface marker antibodies, we show here that olfactory stem cells are closely related to bone marrow stem cells. However, olfactory stem cells also exhibit singular traits. By means of techniques such as proliferation assay, cDNA microarrays, RT-PCR, in vitro and in vivo differentiation, we report that when compared to bone marrow stem cells, olfactory stem cells display (1) a high proliferation rate; (2) a propensity to differentiate into osseous cells; and (3) a disinclination to give rise to chondrocytes and adipocytes. Since peripheral olfactory stem cells originate from a neural crest-derived tissue and, as shown here, exhibit an increased expression of neural cell-related genes, we propose to name them olfactory ectomesenchymal stem cells (OE-MSC). Further studies are now required to corroborate the therapeutic potential of OE-MSCs in animal models of bone and brain diseases.
Cultured mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) possess immune regulatory properties and are already used for clinical purposes, although preclinical data (both in vitro and in vivo in animal models) are not always homogeneous and unequivocal. However, the various MSC-based clinical approaches to treat immunological diseases would be significantly validated and strengthened by using standardized immune assays aimed at obtaining shared, reproducible and consistent data. Thus, the MSC Committee of the International Society for Cellular Therapy has decided to put forward for general discussion a working proposal for a standardized approach based on a critical view of literature data.
Background aimsThe clinical use of human mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) requires ex vivo expansion in media containing supplements such as fetal bovine serum or, alternatively, human platelet lysate (PL).MethodsPlatelet concentrates were frozen, quarantine stored, thawed and sterile filtered to obtain PL. PL content and its effect on fibroblast-colony-forming unit (CFU-F) formation, MSC proliferation and large-scale expansion were studied.ResultsPL contained high levels of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), soluble CD40L (sCD40L), vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), platelet-derived growth factor AA (PDGF-AA), platelet-derived growth factor AB/BB (PDGF-AB/BB), chemokine (C-C) ligand 5 (CCL5; RANTES) transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) and chemokine (C-X-C) ligand 1/2/3 (GRO), with low batch-to-batch variability, and most were stable for up to 14 days. Inhibition of PDGF-BB and bFGF decreased MSC proliferation by about 20% and 50%, respectively. The strongest inhibition (about 75%) was observed with a combination of anti-bFGF + anti-PDGF-BB and anti-bFGF + anti-TGF-β1 + anti-PDGF-BB. Interestingly, various combinations of recombinant PDGF-BB, bFGF and TGF-β1 were not sufficient to promote cell proliferation. PL from whole blood-derived pooled platelet concentrates and apheresis platelet concentrates did not differ significantly in their growth-promoting activity on MSC.ConclusionsPL enhances MSC proliferation and can be regarded as a safe tool for MSC expansion for clinical purposes. \in particular, PDGF-BB and bFGF are essential components for the growth-promoting effect of PL, but are not sufficient for MSC proliferation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.