We evaluated treatment outcomes in a prospective registry of human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis C virus (HCV)–coinfected patients treated with interferon‐free direct‐acting antiviral agent–based therapy in hospitals from the region of Madrid between November 2014 and August 2016. We assessed sustained viral response at 12 weeks after completion of treatment and used multivariable logistic regression to identify predictors of treatment failure. We evaluated 2,369 patients, of whom 59.5% did not have cirrhosis, 33.9% had compensated cirrhosis, and 6.6% had decompensated cirrhosis. The predominant HCV genotypes were 1a (40.9%), 4 (22.4%), 1b (15.1%), and 3 (15.0%). Treatment regimens included sofosbuvir (SOF)/ledipasvir (61.9%), SOF plus daclatasvir (14.6%), dasabuvir plus ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir (13.2%), and other regimens (10.3%). Ribavirin was used in 30.6% of patients. Less than 1% of patients discontinued therapy owing to adverse events. The frequency of sustained viral response by intention‐to‐treat analysis was 92.0% (95% confidence interval, 90.9%‐93.1%) overall, 93.8% (92.4%‐95.0%) for no cirrhosis, 91.0% (88.8%‐92.9%) for compensated cirrhosis, and 80.8% (73.7%‐86.6%) for decompensated cirrhosis. The factors associated with treatment failure were male sex (adjusted odds ratio, 1.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.14‐2.69), Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention category C (adjusted odds ratio, 1.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.12‐2.41), a baseline cluster of differentiation 4–positive (CD4+) T‐cell count <200/mm3 (adjusted odds ratio, 2.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.35‐3.92), an HCV RNA load ≥800,000 IU/mL (adjusted odds ratio, 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.14‐2.36), compensated cirrhosis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.96‐1.89), decompensated cirrhosis (adjusted odds ratio, 2.92; 95% confidence interval, 1.76‐4.87), and the use of SOF plus simeprevir, SOF plus ribavirin, and simeprevir plus daclatasvir. Conclusion: In this large real‐world study, direct‐acting antiviral agent–based therapy was safe and highly effective in coinfected patients; predictors of failure included gender, human immunodeficiency virus–related immunosuppression, HCV RNA load, severity of liver disease, and the use of suboptimal direct‐acting antiviral agent–based regimens. (Hepatology 2018;68:32‐47).

No abstract

No abstract

Guidelines recommend evaluating persistent alteration of liver tests in HCV-infected patients after sustained virological response (SVR) and its influence on liver disease progression. We studied the prevalence, etiology, associated factors and evolutionary implications of persistent alteration of liver tests in HCV patients after direct-acting antivirals (DAA)-induced SVR. This was a prospective study of HCV-infected patients and SVR after DAA. Those with another previously diagnosed liver disease were excluded. Persistent alteration of liver tests was defined as any increase in ALT, AST or GGT at SVR12 and SVR24. Causes were determined according to standard clinical practice, including liver biopsy and follow-up transient elastography. A total of 1112 patients were included (70.8% males, median age 53 years, 38.8% cirrhosis, 34.9% interferon-experienced, 56.8% HIV-coinfected). Persistent alteration of liver tests was detected in 130/1112 patients (11.7% [95%CI: 9.7-13.6]). Its frequency differed between HCV-monoinfected (45/480: 9.4% [95%CI: 6.7-12.1]) and HIV-coinfected (85/632: 13.5% [95%CI: 10.7-16.2]) (P = .046). In multivariable analysis, cirrhosis (OR 2.12; 95%CI: 1.28-3.53; P = .004) and baseline transient elastography values (OR 1.03; 95%CI: 1.01-1.04; P = .000) were associated with persistent alteration of liver tests. The main etiologies were clinical diagnosis suggestive of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in 47 (36.2%), alcohol in 30 (23.1%) and drug consumption in 19 (14.6%). Baseline and follow-up transient elastography was performed in 594 patients and showed a significantly different decrease in patients who did or did not have a persistent alteration of liver tests (-21.1% vs -30%, respectively; P = .003), independently of sex, HIV status or baseline TE value. In conclusion, persistent alteration of liver tests is not infrequent after SVR. It is associated with cirrhosis and baseline transient elastography, and the main cause is fatty liver. According to transient elastography changes, persistent alteration of liver tests seems to affect the course of liver disease.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri bution-NonCo mmercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

Objectives To assess the attitudes and opinions about generic antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) and single-tablet regimen (STR) de-simplification among physicians prescribing HIV treatment in the cohort of the Spanish HIV/AIDS Research Network (CoRIS). Methods An online questionnaire with 27 structured questions was sent to all physicians (n = 199) who prescribed ARVs among the 45 centres participating in the cohort. Results A total of 169 (84.9%) physicians answered the questionnaire. Only 4.1% of the physicians would never prescribe generic ARVs, but 53.3% would not prescribe them if the number of pills per day increased and 89.3% would not prescribe them if the number of doses per day increased. However, 84.0% of the physicians agreed to prescribe generic ARVs if doing so would decrease costs for the public healthcare system. The percentages of physicians stating that generic ARVs (compared with branded ones) would be associated with worse adherence, more adverse effects or more probability of virological failure, provided that the number of pills and doses per day would not change, were low: 0.6%, 7.7% and 3.6%, respectively. However, these percentages were much higher if the generic ARV entailed breaking an STR: 63.9%, 18.9% and 42.0%, respectively. Most physicians stated that they needed more information about the effectiveness and safety of generic ARVs and the price difference compared with their branded equivalents. Conclusions Although most physicians were confident about prescribing generic ARVs, the majority had strong concerns about de-simplifying STR, and they also needed more information about generic drugs.

The ossifying fibromyxoid tumor (OFMT) of soft parts is a rare soft tissue neoplasm of uncertain lineage. The most common metastases are found in the lung. Herein, we present the first case report of pulmonary metastasis of ossifying fibromyxoid tumor with intracardiac extension, which was resected carefully using cardiopulmonary bypass and cardiac arrest. Subsequently pulmonary left lower lobectomy was performed. The patient recovered uneventfully and was discharged in after a few days. Recently, OFMT has been considered as a tumor of intermediate malignancy. We recommend wide surgical excision of primary tumor and radiotherapy. Early follow-up is mandatory.

Background The efficacy of licensed direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens is assumed to be the same for hepatitis C virus (HCV)–monoinfected patients (HCV-Mono) and HIV/HCV-coinfected patients (HCV-Co). However, the high sustained viral response (SVR) rates of DAA regimens and the small number of HIV-infected patients included in registration trials have made it difficult to identify predictors of treatment failure, including the presence of HIV. Methods We compared treatment outcomes for ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) against HCV G1 in treatment-naïve HCV-Mono and HCV-Co without cirrhosis in a prospective registry of individuals receiving DAAs for HCV. Results Up to September 2017, a total of 17 269 patients were registered, and 1358 patients (1055 HCV-Mono/303 HCV-Co) met the inclusion criteria. Significant differences between HCV-Mono and HCV-Co were observed for age, gender, and G1 subtype distribution. Among HCV-Co, 99.0% were receiving antiretroviral therapy. SVR rates for LDV/SOF at 8 weeks did not differ significantly between HCV-Mono and HCV-Co (96.9% vs 94.0%; P = .199). However, the SVR rate for LDV/SOF at 12 weeks was significantly higher for HCV-Mono than HCV-Co (97.2% vs 91.8%; P = .001). A multivariable logistic regression model including age, sex, liver stiffness, G1 subtype, HCV-RNA, HIV, and treatment duration showed the factors associated with treatment failure to be male sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27–4.91; P = .008) and HIV infection (aOR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.13–4.38; P = .020). Conclusions The results of this large prospective study analyzing outcomes for LDV/SOF against HCV G1 in treatment-naïve noncirrhotic patients suggest that HIV infection is a predictor of treatment failure in patients with chronic hepatitis C.