No abstract

Background: Mastectomy is a commonly requested procedure in the transmasculine population and has been shown to improve quality of life, although there is limited research on safety. The aim of this study was to provide a nationwide assessment of epidemiology and postoperative outcomes following masculinizing mastectomy and compare them with outcomes following mastectomy for cancer prophylaxis and gynecomastia correction in cisgender patients. Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2005 to 2017 was queried using International Classification of Diseases and Current Procedural Terminology codes to create cohorts of mastectomies for 3 indications: transmasculine chest reconstruction, cancer risk-reduction (CRRM), and gynecomastia treatment (GM). Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and postoperative complications were compared between the 3 cohorts. Multivariable regression analysis was used to control for confounders. Results: A total of 4,170 mastectomies were identified, of which 14.8% (n = 591) were transmasculine, 17.6% (n = 701) were CRRM, and 67.6% (n = 2,692) were GM. Plastic surgeons performed the majority of transmasculine cases (85.3%), compared with the general surgeons in the CRRM (97.9%) and GM (73.7%) cohorts. All-cause complication rates in the transmasculine, CRRM, and GM cohorts were 4.7%, 10.4%, and 3.7%, respectively. After controlling for confounding variables, transgender males were not at an increased risk for all-cause or wound complications. Multivariable regression identified BMI as a predictor of all-cause and wound complications. Conclusion: Mastectomy is a safe and efficacious procedure for treating gender dysphoria in the transgender male, with an acceptable and reassuring complication profile similar to that seen in cisgender patients who approximate either the natal sex characteristics or the new hormonal environment.

No abstract

Background:Breast augmentation in transgender women can be an important first step in addressing gender incongruence and improving psychosocial functioning. The aim of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes of augmentation mammoplasty in transgender and cisgender females.Methods:We queried the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2006 to 2017 to establish 2 cohorts: (1) transgender females undergoing gender-affirming breast augmentation (“top surgery”) and (2) cisgender females seeking cosmetic breast augmentation (CBA). Demographic characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared between the 2 cohorts. Multivariable regression analysis was used to control for confounders.Results:A total of 1,360 cases were identified, of which 280 (21%) were feminizing top surgeries and 1,080 (79%) were CBA cases. The transfeminine cohort was significantly older, had a higher average body mass index, and was more racially diverse than the CBA cohort. Transfeminine patients also had higher rates of smoking, diabetes, and hypertension. The rates of all-cause complications were low in both cohorts, and differences were not significant (1.6% transfeminine versus 1.8% CBA, P = 0.890) for the first 30-days after operation. After controlling for confounding variables, transfeminine patients had postoperative complication profiles similar to their cisgender counterparts. Multivariable regression analysis revealed no statistically significant predictors for all-cause complications.Conclusions:Transfeminine breast augmentation is a safe procedure that has a similar 30-day complication profile to its cisgender counterpart. The results of this study should reassure and encourage surgeons who are considering performing this procedure.

Background In various surgical specialties, racial disparities in postoperative complications are widely reported. It is assumed that the effect of race can also be found in plastic surgical outcomes, although this remains largely undefined in literature. This study aims to provide data on the impact of race on outcomes of reconstructive breast surgery. Methods Data were collected using the NSQIP (National Surgical Quality Improvement Program) database (2008–2016). Outcomes of the reconstructive breast surgery of White patients were compared with those of African American, Asian, or other races. Logistic regression was performed to control for variations between all groups. Analysis of racial disparities was further sub-stratified according to four different types of breast reconstruction: delayed or immediate autologous, and delayed or immediate prosthesis-based reconstruction. Results In total, this study included 51,362 patients of which 43,864 were Caucasian, 5,135 African American, 2,057 Asian, and 332 of other races. When compared with White patients, patients of African American race had larger body mass indices (31.3 ± 7.0 vs. 27.6 ± 6.3, p-value < 0.001) in addition to higher rates of diabetes (12.3 vs 4.6%, p-value < 0.001) and hypertension (44.7 vs. 23.4%, p-value < 0.001). Both multivariate analysis and the sub-stratified analysis of different types of reconstruction showed no differences in overall complication rate. Conclusion Among the four types of reconstructive procedures, differences in surgical outcomes do not appear to be based on race and therefore seem to be less evident in reconstructive breast surgery compared with the current literature within other surgical specialties.

Background: The United States is currently in the midst of an opioid epidemic precipitated, in part, by the excessive outpatient supply of opioid pain medications. Accordingly, this epidemic has necessitated evaluation of practice and prescription patterns among surgical specialties. The purpose of this study was to quantify opioid-related adverse events in ambulatory plastic surgery. Methods: A retrospective review of 43,074 patient profiles captured from 2001 to 2018 within an American Association for Accreditation of Ambulatory Surgery Facilities quality improvement database was conducted. Free-text search terms related to opioids and overdose were used to identify opioid-related adverse events. Extracted profiles included information submitted by accredited ambulatory surgery facilities and their respective surgeons. Descriptive statistics were used to quantify opioid-related adverse events. Results: Among our cohort, 28 plastic surgery patients were identified as having an opioid-related adverse event. Overall, there were three fatal and 12 nonfatal opioid-related overdoses, nine perioperative opioid-related adverse events, and four cases of opioid-related hypersensitivities or complications secondary to opioid tolerance. Of the nonfatal cases evaluated in the hospital (n = 17), 16 patients required admission, with an average 3.3 ± 1.7 days’ hospital length of stay. Conclusions: Opioid-related adverse events are notable occurrences in ambulatory plastic surgery. Several adverse events may have been prevented had different diligent medication prescription practices been performed. Currently, there is more advocacy supporting sparing opioid medications when possible through multimodal anesthetic techniques, education of patients on the risks and harms of opioid use and misuse, and the development of societal guidance regarding ambulatory surgery prescription practices.

The fenestrated Anaconda is a viable treatment option for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms. Acceptable mortality and morbidity and low reintervention rates contribute to good midterm results. Occurrence of early type I endoleak was relatively common, but these resolved spontaneously in all patients.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.