Midterm results of the fenestrated Anaconda endograft for short-neck infrarenal and juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Blankensteijn, Louise L.; Dijkstra, Martijn; Tielliu, Ignace F.J.; Reijnen, Michel M.P.J.; Zeebregts, Clark J.; Geelkerken, Robert H.; Meerwaldt, R.; Pierie, M.E.; Brussel, J.P. van; Haak, R.F. van den; Schurink, Geert Willem H.; Herwaarden, Joost A. van; Lardenoije, Jan Willem; Jahrome, A. Khodadade; Balm, Ron; Klemm, Peter; Witte, M.E.; Waasdorp, Evert J.; Schlejen, P.M.; Rijn, Marie Josee van; Verhagen, Hence J.M.

doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2016.08.092

Cited by 21 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The primary outcomes were 30-day/in-hospital mortality and postoperative renal insufficiency. Secondary outcomes Wooster et al 16 Blankensteijn et al 12 Katsargyris et al 20 Caradu et al 7 Saratzis et al 22 Vemuri et al 13 Kristmundsson et al 14 Grimme et al 15 Banno et al 17 Oderich et al 23 Perot et al 18 Manning et al 21 Total 0 0…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Meta‐analysis of fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgical repair of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms over the last 10 years

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundJuxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms pose a significant challenge whether managed endovascularly or by open surgery. Fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) is now well established, but few studies have compared it with open surgical repair (OSR). The aim of this systematic review was to compare short‐ and long‐term outcomes of FEVAR and OSR for the management of juxtarenal aortic aneurysms.MethodsA literature search was conducted of the Ovid Medline, EMBASE and PubMed databases. Reasons for exclusion were series with fewer than 20 patients, studies published before 2007 and those concerning ruptured aneurysms. Owing to variance in definitions, the terms ‘juxta/para/suprarenal’ were used; thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms were excluded. Primary outcomes were 30‐day/in‐hospital mortality and renal insufficiency. Secondary outcomes included major complication rates, rate of reintervention and rates of endoleak.ResultsTwenty‐seven studies were identified, involving 2974 patients. Study designs included 11 case series, 14 series within retrospective cohort studies, one case–control study and a single prospective non‐randomized trial. The pooled early postoperative mortality rate following FEVAR was 3·3 (95 per cent c.i. 2·0 to 5·0) per cent, compared with 4·2 (2·9 to 5·7) per cent after OSR. After FEVAR, the rate of postoperative renal insufficiency was 16·2 (10·4 to 23·0) per cent, compared with 23·8 (15·2 to 33·6) per cent after OSR. The major early complication rate following FEVAR was 23·1 (16·8 to 30·1) per cent versus 43·5 (34·4 to 52·8) per cent after OSR. The rate of late reintervention after FEVAR was higher than that after OSR: 11·1 (6·7 to 16·4) versus 2·0 (0·6 to 4·3) per cent respectively.ConclusionNo significant difference was noted in 30‐day mortality; however, FEVAR was associated with significantly lower morbidity than OSR. Long‐term durability is a concern, with far higher reintervention rates after FEVAR.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Meta‐analysis of fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgical repair of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms over the last 10 years

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Despite the early advantages of the endovascular approach, secondary reinterventions remain high with FEVAR, averaging 22% to 37% at 5 years in recent reports. [15][16][17][18][19] Tinelli et al 20 reported a retrospective propensity matched comparison of FEVAR with open surgical repair. In that study, open surgical repair had higher rates of acute kidney injury (52% vs 20%), similar freedom from renal function deterioration, but higher freedom from reinterventions at 6 years (93.4% vs 63.9%).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Final 5-year results of the United States Zenith Fenestrated prospective multicenter study for juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms

Oderich

Farber

Schneider

et al. 2021

Journal of Vascular Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Primary treatment was shown to have an early complication rate of 19% to 24%. [20][21][22][23] Postoperative complication risk and mortality require limitation of the use of the Fenestrated Anaconda cuff to patients in whom open repair is not an option, and careful selection of patients is essential.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Early results with the custom-made Fenestrated Anaconda aortic cuff in the treatment of complex abdominal aortic aneurysm

Niet

Reijnen

Falkensammer

et al. 2019

Journal of Vascular Surgery

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Midterm results of the fenestrated Anaconda endograft for short-neck infrarenal and juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Cited by 21 publications

References 21 publications

Meta‐analysis of fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgical repair of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms over the last 10 years

Meta‐analysis of fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgical repair of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms over the last 10 years

Final 5-year results of the United States Zenith Fenestrated prospective multicenter study for juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms

Early results with the custom-made Fenestrated Anaconda aortic cuff in the treatment of complex abdominal aortic aneurysm

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About