Background: Safety and effectiveness outcomes in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients receiving different disease-modifying therapies (DMT) and different types of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 are limited. Growing evidence coming mainly from Israel, Europe and North America using mRNA and adenoviral vector vaccines has been published. Objectives: To assess the safety and humoral response of inactivated virus and mRNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with MS. Methods: Ongoing, multicentric, prospective, observational study performed between February and September 2021. Humoral response (antibodies against spike-1 protein) was determined at least 4 weeks after the complete schedule of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Categorical outcome (positive/negative) and total antibody titres were recorded. Adverse events supposedly attributable to vaccination (AESAV) were collected. Results: 178 patients, 68% women, mean age 39.7±11.2 years, 123 received inactivated (Coronavac-Sinovac), 51 mRNA (Pfizer-BioNtech), and 4 adenoviral vector vaccines (CanSino n=2, Jonhson&Johnson-Jannsen n=1, Oxford-AstraZeneca n=1). Six patients had a history of COVID-19 before vaccination. Overall humoral response was observed in 66.9% (62.6% inactivated vs. 78.4% mRNA, p=0.04). Positive anti-S1-antibodies were observed in 100% of patients with no DMT (n=3), 100% with interferon/glatiramer-acetate (n=11), 100% with teriflunomide/dimethyl-fumarate (n=16), 100% with natalizumab (n=10), 100% with alemtuzumab (n=8), 90% with cladribine (n=10), and 88% with fingolimod (n=17), while 43% of patients receiving antiCD20 (n=99) were positive (38% inactivated vaccine vs. 59% mRNA vaccine, p=0.05). In the multivariate analysis including antiCD20 patients, the predictors for a positive humoral response were receiving the mRNA vaccine (OR 8.11 (1.79-36.8), p=0.007) and a lower number of total infusions (OR 0.44 (0.27-0.74) p=0.002. The most frequent AESAV was local pain (14%), with 4 (2.2%) patients experiencing mild-moderate relapses within 8 weeks of first vaccination compared to 11 relapses (6.2%) within the 8 weeks before vaccination (Chi-squared 3.41, p=0.06). Discussion: A higher humoral response rate was observed using the mRNA compared to the inactivated vaccine, while patients using antiCD20 had a significantly lower response rate, and patients using antiCD20 and fingolimod had lower antibody titres. In this MS patient cohort, inactivated and mRNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 appear to be safe, with no increase in relapse rate. This information may help guidelines including booster shots and types of vaccines in selected populations.
Highlights Only 19.4% of South American MS and/or NMOSD experts had experience in TM previous COVID-19 pandemic; Medical appointments decreased by 50% during the pandemic era; Using TM, most neurologists believed to be able to identify a relapse.
Abstract-Recent studies suggested that type 2 angiotensin receptor (AT2R) could contribute to regulation of blood pressure and/or vascular remodeling. A key question relates to the effects of potential modulators of vascular AT2R expression. In the present work, we evaluated if high salt intake (70 mmol/L NaCl in drinking water) could modulate rat mesenteric artery AT2R function and expression. Angiotensin II dose-response curves were studied in rat perfused pressurized small-diameter arteries in the presence of losartan (AT1R antagonist Key Words: mineralocorticoid Ⅲ sodium Ⅲ hypertension Ⅲ vascular remodeling Ⅲ apoptosis T he renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) regulates vascular tone, body fluid volume, electrolyte balance, hormonal secretion, and neuronal activity. The biological effects of angiotensin II (Ang II), the main effector peptide in the vasculature, are mediated by at least 2 receptor isofoms. 1,2 The type 1 receptor (AT1R) mediates vasoconstriction, sympathetic facilitation, and trophic effects. The type 2 receptor (AT2R) is widely expressed during fetal development, whereas in the adult its expression has been detected in many different vessel types, including mesenteric, coronary, and renal arteries. 3-6 AT2R has opposite effects to those of AT1R, ie, it promotes cell apoptosis and inhibits cell proliferation. 6,7 AT2R also attenuates the pressor action of Ang II 8 and mediates vasodilation. 9,10 Recently, it has been shown that Ang II relaxes small mesenteric arteries via AT2R when AT1R are blocked. [11][12][13] Interestingly, the expression of AT2R is increased in several pathologic conditions such as vascular injury, 14 cardiac remodeling, congestive heart failure, and myocardial infarction. 15,16 It has been suggested that in adults the presence of AT2R in vascular tissues may be playing a role in vascular tone and/or tissue remodeling. [17][18][19] Therefore, a key and complex question that arises is how AT1R and AT2R expression are modulated. Several studies indicate interaction between Ang II and aldosterone, affecting the expression of ATRs. The expression of AT1R appears to be induced by Ang II in vascular smooth muscle, 4 and mineralocorticoids potentiate the action of Ang II in cultured rat vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) by increasing the number of AT1R. 20,21 However, there are few data concerning the physiological regulation of AT2R expression. Dietary sodium depletion, which increases RAAS activity, enhances renal AT2 receptor function 10,22 and expression in both young and mature adult rats, mainly in the glomeruli and interstitial cells. 23 Induction of AT2R-mediated modulation of blood pressure was described in rats fed with a synthetic diet, an effect attributed to the stimulation of the RAAS. 8 Bonnet et al 24 have shown that Ang II infusion in the rat induces the expression of AT2R in the mesenteric vasculature. Nevertheless, it is not clear whether Ang II directly mediates the increased AT2R expression or if it is secondary to direct aldosterone action on arte...
Fluctuations of TLCs within 0.2-0.6 × 10(9) lymphocytes/L in patients receiving fingolimod reflect changes in total CCR7-CD8+ effector cells, a population less regulated by this agent. Although less apparent than for patients discontinuing therapy, cells expected to be sequestered by this therapy may begin to re-emerge when TLC values are >0.6 × 10(9) lymphocytes/L.
Background: Despite the abundance of information concerning ocrelizumab in phase III clinical trials, there is scarce evidence regarding real-world patient profiles. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate patient profiles, effectiveness and persistence with treatment among patients who used ocrelizumab for treatment of multiple sclerosis in Latin America. Methods: This was a retrospective multicenter study in Argentina, Chile and Mexico. Medical record databases on patients who received ocrelizumab were analyzed. Demographic and clinical variables were described, along with effectiveness outcomes, which included the proportions of patients free from clinical relapses, from disability progression and from new or enlarging T2 or T1 gadolinium-enhancing lesions, on annual magnetic resonance imaging. Results: A total of 81 patients were included. The most frequent phenotype was relapsing-remitting MS, in 64.2% of the patients. The mean age at study entry was 41.3 ± 12.0 years and 51.8% were women. A total of 38% had had relapse activity during the 12 months before starting on ocrelizumab, with a mean relapse rate of 1.3 ± 0.6 during that period. 75% were free from clinical relapses and 91% were free from gadolinium-enhancing lesions in the relapsing-remitting course. Ocrelizumab discontinuation during the first 12 months was observed in three patients (3.7%). The mean persistence observed during the first-year follow-up was 338 ± 24 days. Conclusions: Our study is in line with previous randomized clinical trials and recent real-world studies describing patient profiles, effectiveness and persistence regarding ocrelizumab treatment in multiple sclerosis patients in Latin America.
Background The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a novel disease that has spread abruptly over the world, allowing the development of countermeasures an urgent global priority. It has been speculated that elder people and patient with comorbidities may be at risk of developing complication. On the other hand, it has been seen that immunosuppressed patients could develop a mild presentation of the disease. Based on this hypothesis, several immunosuppressant agents are currently being tested as potential treatment for coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19). Methods report a patient treated with alemtuzumab (Humanized monoclonal antibody against the lymphocyte and monocyte surface antigen CD52, which depletes B and T cells) ( Thompson et al., 2018 ) for recurrent remittent multiple sclerosis (RRMS) who developed mild COVID-19. Results Despite complete B and T cell depletion, patient symptoms abated few days with no need for hospitalization due to COVID-19 and no clinical evidence of disease activation regarding her MS. Discussion This report shows that MS patients with mild depletion of B and T cells can mount an antiviral response against COVID-19 and produce IgG.
Background: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) is an increasing diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in Latin America (LATAM). Despite the heterogeneity of this population, ethnic and socioeconomic commonalities exist, and epidemiologic studies from the region have had a limited geographic and population outreach. Identification of some aspects from the entire region are lacking. Objectives: To determine ethnic, clinical characteristics, and utilization of diagnostic tools and types of therapy for patients with NMOSD in the entire Latin American region. Methods: The Latin American Committee for Treatment and Research in MS (LACTRIMS) created an exploratory investigational survey addressed by Invitation to NMOSD Latin American experts identified through diverse sources. Data input closed after 30 days from the initial invitation. The questionnaire allowed use of absolute numbers or percentages. Multiple option responses covering 25 themes included definition of type of practice; number of NMOSD cases; ethnicity; utilization of the 2015 International Panel criteria for the diagnosis of Neuromyelitis optica (IPDN); clinical phenotypes; methodology utilized for determination of anti-Aquaporin-4 (anti-AQP4) antibodies serological testing, and if this was performed locally or processed abroad; treatment of relapses, and long-term management were surveyed. Results: We identified 62 investigators from 21 countries reporting information from 2154 patients (utilizing the IPDN criteria in 93.9% of cases), which were categorized in two geographical regions: North-Central, including the Caribbean (NCC), and South America (SA). Ethnic identification disclosed Mestizos 61.4% as the main group. The most common presenting symptoms were concomitant presence of optic neuritis and transverse myelitis in 31.8% (p=0.95); only optic neuritis in 31.4% (more common in SA), p<0.001); involvement of the area postrema occurred in 21.5% and brain stem in 8.3%, both were more frequent in the South American cases (p<0.001). Anti-AQP4 antibodies were positive in 63.9% and anti-Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein (MOG) antibodies in 4.8% of total cases. The specific laboratorial method employed was not known by 23.8% of the investigators. Acute relapses were identified in 81.6% of cases, and were treated in 93.9% of them with intravenous steroids (IVS); 62.1% with plasma exchange (PE), and 40.9% with intravenous immunoglobulin-G (IVIG). Therapy was escalated in some cases due to suboptimal initial response. Respondents favored Rituximab as long-term therapy (86.3%), whereas azathioprine was also utilized on 81.8% of the cases, either agent used indistinctly by the investigators according to treatment accessibility or clinical judgement. There were no differences among the geographic regions. Conclusions: This is the first study including all countries of LATAM and the largest cohort reported from a multinational specific world area. Ethnic distributions and phenotypic features of the disease in the region, challenges in access to di...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.