Occupational exposures to organic dusts, gases, welding fumes and agricultural chemicals result in farmers' increased risk of respiratory health problems compared to other workers. The Respiratory Health Program for Saskatchewan farmers addresses the difficulties of delivering an occupational health program to a sparsely distributed population on the Prairies. We summarized their pulmonary function and respiratory health by spirometry and questionnaire respectively. The necessity of the program was demonstrated by the frequency of lower than predicted pulmonary function tests and referrals to family physicians (1996 through 1999). Age, years in farming, usual cough, wheezing on most days and nights, bringing up phlegm from the chest, breathlessness, and cigarette smoking were associated significantly with pulmonary function results. We evaluated the Respiratory Health Program (1994 through 2000) with respect to acceptability, accessibility, appropriateness, continuity, effectiveness, efficiency, and risk/safety by using questionnaires and evaluations by farm families.
We examined familial resemblance and performed segregation analysis for the maximal expiratory flow rate at 50% of vital capacity (Vmax50) and the ratio of Vmax50 to forced vital capacity (FVC), based on data from 309 nuclear families with 1,045 individuals in the town of Humboldt, Saskatchewan, in 1993. Vmax50 is considered as an index of airway function and Vmax50/FVC is considered as an index of airway-parenchymal dysanapsis. Both Vmax50 and Vmax50/FVC were preadjusted for host characteristics (age, height, and weight), environmental factors, and history of respiratory symptoms and diseases in four separate groups (mothers, fathers, daughters, and sons). Both Vmax50 and Vmax50/FVC showed low father-mother correlations and significant parent-offspring and sibling-sibling correlations. Segregation analysis indicated that for residual Vmax50, the model of no-parent-offspring transmission with possible heterogeneity between two generations fitted the data as well as did the general model with arbitrary transmission probabilities. The Mendelian hypothesis for Vmax50 was rejected, which was consistent with our previous findings for other indexes of airway function. For residual Vmax50/FVC, however, a single locus explained all the familial resemblance and both no-parent-offspring-transmission hypotheses [tau(AA) = tau(AB) = tau(BB) = qA and tau(AA) = tau(AB) = tau(BB)] were rejected. The study provides evidence for a single locus influencing airway-parenchymal dysanapsis.
We report the results of segregation analyses for wheeze before and after a history of respiratory allergy was taken into consideration. The analyses were based on data from 309 nuclear families with 1,053 individuals living in the town of Humboldt, Saskatchewan in 1993, and were performed by using the REGD program of the SAGE package. For adults, information on wheeze and history of respiratory allergy was provided by themselves, and for children, by their parents. Segregation analyses were first conducted before adjustment for history of respiratory allergy. Other covariates were adjusted including sex, current smoking, household exposure to tobacco smoke, and type of house. A single locus model with residual familial effects fit the data well, but none of the Mendelian models (recessive, dominant, and codominant) could be distinguished. The no-parent-offspring-transmission hypothesis was rejected. However, when the variable of respiratory allergy was included in the models as a covariate, both Mendelian and environmental hypotheses were rejected. The Mendelian model had a relatively lower value of Akaike's Information Criterion than did the environmental model (1095.56 versus 1111.24). The data suggest that a single locus gene explains a portion of wheeze that is related to respiratory allergy, and that common environmental factors and/or polygenes also account for a certain familial aggregation of wheeze.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.