Knowing the best revascularization option for diabetic patients with multiple vessel disease is a challenge without a definitive answer. There have been several randomized clinical trials and subsequent meta-analyses comparing current available technology trying to reach an exhaustive conclusion; comparisons between coronary artery bypass grafts and bare-metal stents, coronary artery bypass grafts and first generation drug-eluting stents and, most recently, first generation versus latest generation drug-eluting stents generated some interesting results. Information provided by pooled data from some of the most important randomized clinical cardiology trials from the last two decades have produced surprising results. The authors analyze these data to discuss the best therapeutic procedures for each patient.
Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the electrocardiographic characteristics in pregnant women without cardiovascular disease. Methods: This was a descriptive, cross-sectional, multicenter study, including patients without cardiovascular disease in their third trimester of pregnancy, who underwent cardiac evaluation before delivery between April and July 2020. All patients signed the corresponding informed consent. Results: A total of 80 tracings were analyzed. Median heart rate was 82 bpm (IQR 70-93 bpm) and median QRS axis was 54° (IQR 39°-71°). Q waves and ST segment depression were relatively frequent in inferior leads and from V4 to V6. Median QTc was 422 msec (IQR 404-445 msec) and median time from T wave peak to T wave end was 86 msec (IQR 74-95 msec). Conclusion: The most common changes occurred in T wave peak to T wave end and from V4 to V6. Main changes included q waves and ST-segment depression. Axis deviations, sinus tachycardia or prolonged QTc were rare
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.