Background Prevalence rates of sexual dysfunction (SD) in Parkinson's disease (PD) are likely to be underestimated and their etiology is still unknown. More understanding of this issue is needed. Aim To investigate prevalence of SD and its variables, including gender differences, in a sample of PD patients. Methods This multicenter observational study included 203 patients (113 males and 90 females) affected by PD (diagnosed according to UK Parkinson's Disease Society Brain Bank clinical diagnostic criteria 28), and living in 3 different Italian regions. Patients were evaluated using a semi-structured interview (a 40-item ad hoc questionnaire, developed by the authors to investigate patient's 3 main life areas: sociodemographic information, illness perception, and sexuality) and specific standardized scales to investigate SD, as well as by means of tools to assess their motor impairment, daily life activities, and disease-related caregiver burden (CBI). Main Outcome Measures The International Index of Erectile Function and the Female Sexual Function Index. Results Sexual dysfunction was observed in about 68% of men, and in around 53% of women loss of libido being the main sexual concern in both sexes. Men were significantly more affected by SD than women (χ2 (1) = 4.34, P-value = .037), but no difference in the severity of the dysfunction emerged between genders. Around 85% of PD patients had a stable couple relationship, and about 40% were satisfied with such a relationship. However, about 57% of the patients stated that the disease affected their sexual life, especially due to reduced sexual desire, and the frequency of sexual intercourses. Moreover, significant differences between subjects with SD and subjects without SD were found in UPDRS (I-II-III domains), in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and CBI scores. Clinical Implications Clinicians dealing with PD should pay more attention to sexual issues, as discussing and treating sexual problems enters the framework of a holistic approach, which is mandatory in chronic illness. Strengths & Limitations The major strengths of this study include the multicenter nature of the study, to overcome single-center methodological bias. The main limitation is the relatively small sample size, and the absence of a control group, even if there are growing literature data on sexuality and aging supporting our findings. Conclusion SD is a highly prevalent and devastating problem in patients affected by PD, negatively affecting their quality of life.
SAI detected using [(123) I]FP-CIT SPECT can be used to differentiate VP and PD with a good degree of certainty.
The timed up and go test (TUG) is a widely used clinical test for the evaluation of balance and mobility. An instrumented version of TUG (iTUG) has been proposed to provide quantitative information on TUG performances. Here, we hypothesized that L-dopa may differently influence gait parameters recorded by a portable inertial sensor. To test this idea, we evaluated iTUG test in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), both in L-dopa OFF and ON state. Twenty-eight PD patients performed the iTUG. Subjects were instructed to perform the task both in practical "OFF" and "ON" state. The system differentiated the test in six phases, recording phase durations, three-axial accelerations, average and peak angular speeds during turning. In all patients, sit-to-stand vertical and medio-lateral accelerations together with turning phase duration and angular speeds improved after L-dopa administration, while sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit phases antero-posterior accelerations were less responsive. In PD, L-dopa modulates iTUG in different ways, mostly improving the turning phases and less acting on postural controls during the sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit phases. Our results suggest different involvement of dopaminergic mechanisms on gait as assessed by iTUG. This is important for those aspects which are not improved by pharmacological therapy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.