This article explores transnational dialogues between peoples of colour in Brazil, Spanish-speaking South America, Haiti, and North America on issues relating to revolution, abolitionism, diplomacy and civil rights in the nineteenth century. By focusing on Emiliano Felipe Benício Mundrucu (1791 1863), a Brazilian pardo who travelled and lived in Brazil, Venezuela, Haiti and the United States, this paper discusses the unique socioeconomic , racial, and political perspectives that educated, polyglot and unusually well-travelled peoples of colour brought to debates on abolition, civil rights and broader hemispheric-wide questions of black identity in this period. It also explores their involvement in transnational revolutionary activity in the early nineteenth century, discussing how Mundrucu, along with other Brazilian secessionists, solicited the help of the young, radical republics of Haiti and Gran Colombia to challenge the Brazilian monarchy in Rio de Janeiro and establish a federalist republic in the north east of the country.
This article argues that black men and women activists from the Caribbean and South America made key contributions to the US abolitionist, civil rights and women's rights campaigns in the mid-nineteenth century. It does so by examining three case studies of Boston and New Yorkbased activists from Brazil, Haiti and Jamaica. Using diverse primary sources from across the Americas, including court transcripts, abolitionist society minutes, and newspaper correspondence, it also demonstrates how these activists created unique inter-American dialogues on slavery, emancipation, segregation, racism, and gender between black communities in the Americas. In doing so, this article challenges current Anglo-American and North Atlantic biases in the historiography of transnational black abolitionism and civil rights, and instead shifts our attention to the inter-American sphere of black activism. Lastly, it also contributes to discussions around silence in the study of black activists during this period.In October 1833, a black man took a steamboat captain to court for refusing to allow him and his sick wife to enter the whites-only cabins on a vessel travelling from New Bedford to Nantucket, Massachusetts. In the Boston Court of Common Pleas, the plaintiff's lawyers appealed to the jury to consider Captain Edward Barker's actions a 'violation of humanity'. 1The case garnered local and national attention as a pivotal moment in early campaigns against racial discrimination and segregation. According to the Boston Daily Advertiser, 'The court room was much crowded during the trial', and thousands of readers followed regular updates published in newspapers across the US Northeast. 2 The verdict must have shocked many of them. Judge Artemas Ward ruled that the plaintiff 'was to have no more or no less damages than he would have been entitled to if he had been a white man'. 3 Aside from being one of the earliest lawsuits against segregation in Massachusetts and US history, the case was also remarkable because the plaintiff, Emiliano Felipe Benício Mundrucu, was from northeast Brazil.Mundrucu v. Barker also carried global importance for Atlantic-wide campaigns against racial prejudice. Prominent politicians, lawyers, and anti-slavery activists rallied around Mundrucu who was represented by David Lee Child and US Senator for Massachusetts, Daniel Webster. British and US abolitionists, eager to point out the hypocrisies of the early US republic, took great interest in Mundrucu v. Barker. Child, a lawyer, journalist, and prominent abolitionist, used Mundrucu's story to denounce racism in the US as far worse than anywhere else in the Americas. Comparing racial discrimination across the hemisphere, Child claimed that 'In Spain and Portugal, and their colonies, and in Brazil, it scarcely exists at all.' 4 Reporting on Mundrucu's story to the British press, renowned English abolitionist and author Edward Abdy condemned Boston's 'aristocracy of the skin'. 5 In taking a stand against segregation, a black Brazilian immigrant had focused natio...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.