Proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs) technology has emerged as a novel therapeutic paradigm in recent years. PROTACs are heterobifunctional molecules that degrade target proteins by hijacking the ubiquitin–proteasome system. Currently, about 20–25% of all protein targets are being studied, and most works focus on their enzymatic functions. Unlike small molecules, PROTACs inhibit the whole biological function of the target protein by binding to the target protein and inducing subsequent proteasomal degradation. PROTACs compensate for limitations that transcription factors, nuclear proteins, and other scaffolding proteins are difficult to handle with traditional small-molecule inhibitors. Currently, PROTACs have successfully degraded diverse proteins, such as BTK, BRD4, AR, ER, STAT3, IRAK4, tau, etc. And ARV-110 and ARV-471 exhibited excellent efficacy in clinical II trials. However, what targets are appropriate for PROTAC technology to achieve better benefits than small-molecule inhibitors are not fully understood. And how to rationally design an efficient PROTACs and optimize it to be orally effective poses big challenges for researchers. In this review, we summarize the features of PROTAC technology, analyze the detail of general principles for designing efficient PROTACs, and discuss the typical application of PROTACs targeting different protein categories. In addition, we also introduce the progress of relevant clinical trial results of representative PROTACs and assess the challenges and limitations that PROTACs may face. Collectively, our studies provide references for further application of PROTACs.
Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) will be accompanied by the overload of iron and reactive oxygen species (ROS) following hematoma clearance. Although deferoxamine (DFO) has been widely utilized as a clinical first-line siderophore to remove the iron overload, the ROS-inducing damage still greatly limits the therapeutic effect of DFO. To address this issue, we designed and fabricated a series of dualfunctional macromolecular nanoscavengers featuring high-density DFO units and catechol moieties. Note that the former units could effectively remove the iron overload, while the latter ones could efficiently deplete the ROS. The resulting nanoscavengers efficiently down-regulate the iron and ROS levels as well as significantly reduce the cell death in both ironoverloaded RAW 264.7 cells and the ICH mice model. This work suggests a novel clue for the ICH-ameliorated iron-depleting interventional therapeutic regimen.
Background Sepsis biomarkers have limited specificity and sensitivity. Few studies have investigated microRNA (miRNA) biomarkers for sepsis secondary to pneumonia. This study aims to investigate the diagnostic and prognostic values of miRNAs in sepsis secondary to pneumonia. Methods Sepsis 3.0 was used to diagnose sepsis. Screening was performed through the Agilent miRNA chip technology by using the following criteria: p < 0.05, fold ≥2 or < 0.5, or copy number > 50 change. This study recruited 52 patients with pneumonia, including 31 males (59.6%) and 21 females (40.4%), 44 patients with sepsis secondary to pneumonia were diagnosed via Sepsis 3.0 (34 [77.3%] males and 10 [22.7%] females), and 21 healthy controls were used for miRNA verification. The miRNA levels were detected through fluorescence real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Results: Fluorescence qRT-PCR detection showed that the miR-7110-5p and miR-223-3p expression levels in both patient groups were upregulated compared with those in the healthy controls. The expression levels differed between patients with pneumonia and those with sepsis secondary to pneumonia. The sensitivity and specificity of miR-7110-5p to differentiate sepsis from healthy controls were 84.2 and 90.5%, whereas those of miR-223-3p were 82.9 and 100%, respectively. Multivariate analysis of variance suggested that the presence of sepsis affected the miR-223-3p level ( p = 0.041), whereas the presence of sepsis ( p = 0.000) and the underlying disease ( p = 0.025) influenced the miR-7110-5p level. Conclusions MiR-223-3p could be utilized to predict sepsis secondary to pneumonia.
Background:Hospitals have expressed no knowledge of patients’ opinions regarding diversified appointment registration systems, despite efforts to develop novel appointment registration systems that assist patients and increase hospital efficiency. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the use of diversified appointment registration systems and explore the factors influencing patients’ registration system choices.Methods:A survey study using a questionnaire was conducted in West China Hospital in February 2012. Outpatients were randomly selected from different hospital departments and the questionnaire was distributed and collected on-site.Results:Data from 1,009 patients were available for analysis. Of these, 63.4% used appointment systems to register while others chose a traditional queuing method to register. 114 telephone (30.4%) and on-site (22.9%) appointments were made, whereas other systems were less used by patients. Between the non-appointment and appointment groups there were significant differences in gender, educational degree, and residence location (P < 0.05), but no significant difference in age (P > 0.05). While the clinical appointment system had the greatest number of appointment days (25.75), the bank's self-service terminal appointment had the least number of appointment days (5.05). Leaflets sent from the hospital (50.70%) and the recommendations of friends or families (40.77%) were the two main ways of knowing about the appointment registration systems. With the exception of those who felt no need to make an appointment (30.12%), not having the capability to use the appointment systems (24.10%) and the lack of a registered health card (34.53%) were the two main reasons for not using appointment registration systems.Conclusions:Convenience was a major motivation for patients’ use of appointment registration systems. Personal knowledge and capability were the two important factors that influenced patients’ appointment system choices. Hospitals must improve the design and promotion of appointment registration systems to better facilitate their use.
Skin wound caused by trauma, inflammation, surgery, or burns remains a great challenge worldwide since there is no effective therapy available to improve its clinical outcomes. Herein, we report a copper sulfide nanoparticles-incorporated hyaluronic acid (CuS/HA) injectable hydrogel with enhanced angiogenesis to promote wound healing. The prepared hydrogel could not only be injected to the wound site but also exhibited good photothermal effect, with temperature increasing to 50 • C from room temperature after 10 min of near-infrared light irradiation. The cell culture experiments also showed that the hydrogel has no cytotoxicity. In the rat skin wound model, the hydrogel treated wounds exhibited better healing performances. Masson's trichrome staining suggested that collagen deposition in wounds treated with the hydrogel was significantly higher than other groups. The immunohistochemical staining showed that the hydrogel can effectively upregulate the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the wound area at the incipient stage of healing, and the CD 31 immunofluorescence staining confirmed the enhanced angiogenesis of the hydrogel. Taken together, the prepared CuS/HA hydrogel can effectively increase the collagen deposition, upregulate the expression of VEGF, and enhance the angiogenesis, which may contribute to promote wound healing, making it a promising for application in treating skin wound.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.