RankComp is implemented in R script that is freely available from Supplementary Materials.

Most of current gene expression signatures for cancer prognosis are based on risk scores, usually calculated as some summaries of expression levels of the signature genes, whose applications require presetting risk score thresholds and data normalization. In this study, we demonstrate the critical limitations of such type of signatures that the risk scores of samples will change greatly when they are normalized together with different samples, which would induce spurious risk classification and difficulty in clinical settings, and the risk scores of independent samples are incomparable if data normalization is not adopted. To overcome these limitations, we propose a rank-based method to extract a prognostic gene pair signature for overall survival of stage I non-small-cell lung cancer. The prognostic gene pair signature is verified in three integrated data sets detected by different laboratories with different microarray platforms. We conclude that, different from the type of signatures based on risk scores summarized from gene expression levels, the rank-based signatures could be robustly applied at the individualized level to independent clinical samples assessed in different laboratories.

BackgroundDeregulations of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been implicated in cancer initiation and progression. Current methods can only capture differential expression of lncRNAs at the population level and ignore the heterogeneous expression of lncRNAs in individual patients.MethodsWe propose a method (LncRIndiv) to identify differentially expressed (DE) lncRNAs in individual cancer patients by exploiting the disrupted ordering of expression levels of lncRNAs in each disease sample in comparison with stable normal ordering. LncRIndiv was applied to lncRNA expression profiles of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Based on the expression profile of LUAD individual-level DE lncRNAs, we used a forward selection procedure to identify prognostic signature for stage I-II LUAD patients without adjuvant therapy.ResultsIn both simulated data and real pair-wise cancer and normal sample data, LncRIndiv method showed good performance. Based on the individual-level DE lncRNAs, we developed a robust prognostic signature consisting of two lncRNA (C1orf132 and TMPO-AS1) for stage I-II LUAD patients without adjuvant therapy (P = 3.06 × 10−6, log-rank test), which was confirmed in two independent datasets of GSE50081 (P = 1.82 × 10−2, log-rank test) and GSE31210 (P = 7.43 × 10−4, log-rank test) after adjusting other clinical factors such as smoking status and stages. Pathway analysis showed that TMPO-AS1 and C1orf132 could affect the prognosis of LUAD patients through regulating cell cycle and cell adhesion.Conclusions LncRIndiv can successfully detect DE lncRNAs in individuals and be applied to identify prognostic signature for LUAD patients.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12943-017-0666-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Autophagy is a process that degrades intracellular constituents, such as long-lived or damaged proteins and organelles, to buffer metabolic stress under starvation conditions. Deregulation of autophagy is involved in the progression of cancer. However, the predictive value of autophagy for breast cancer prognosis remains unclear. First, based on gene expression profiling, we found that autophagy genes were implicated in breast cancer. Then, using the Cox proportional hazard regression model, we detected autophagy prognostic signature for breast cancer in a training dataset. We identified a set of eight autophagy genes (BCL2, BIRC5, EIF4EBP1, ERO1L, FOS, GAPDH, ITPR1 and VEGFA) that were significantly associated with overall survival in breast cancer. The eight autophagy genes were assigned as a autophagy-related prognostic signature for breast cancer. Based on the autophagy-related signature, the training dataset GSE21653 could be classified into high-risk and low-risk subgroups with significantly different survival times (HR = 2.72, 95% CI = (1.91, 3.87); P = 1.37 × 10(-5)). Inactivation of autophagy was associated with shortened survival of breast cancer patients. The prognostic value of the autophagy-related signature was confirmed in the testing dataset GSE3494 (HR = 2.12, 95% CI = (1.48, 3.03); P = 1.65 × 10(-3)) and GSE7390 (HR = 1.76, 95% CI = (1.22, 2.54); P = 9.95 × 10(-4)). Further analysis revealed that the prognostic value of the autophagy signature was independent of known clinical prognostic factors, including age, tumor size, grade, estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, ERBB2 status, lymph node status and TP53 mutation status. Finally, we demonstrated that the autophagy signature could also predict distant metastasis-free survival for breast cancer.

To detect differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in small-scale cell line experiments, usually with only two or three technical replicates for each state, the commonly used statistical methods such as significance analysis of microarrays (SAM), limma and RankProd (RP) lack statistical power, while the fold change method lacks any statistical control. In this study, we demonstrated that the within-sample relative expression orderings (REOs) of gene pairs were highly stable among technical replicates of a cell line but often widely disrupted after certain treatments such like gene knockdown, gene transfection and drug treatment. Based on this finding, we customized the RankComp algorithm, previously designed for individualized differential expression analysis through REO comparison, to identify DEGs with certain statistical control for small-scale cell line data. In both simulated and real data, the new algorithm, named CellComp, exhibited high precision with much higher sensitivity than the original RankComp, SAM, limma and RP methods. Therefore, CellComp provides an efficient tool for analyzing small-scale cell line data.

Background:For lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients receiving platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT), predictive signatures extracted from survival data solely are not directly associated with platinum response. Another limitation of reported signatures, commonly based on risk scores summarised from gene expressions, is that they could not be applied directly to samples measured by different laboratories due to experimental batch effects.Methods:Using 60 samples of LUAD patients receiving platinum-based ACT in TCGA, we pre-selected gene pairs whose within-samples relative expression orderings (REOs) were significantly associated with both pathological response and 5-year survival, from which we selected an optimal signature whose within-samples REOs could identify responders with improved 5-year survival rate.Results:A predictive signature consisting of three gene pairs was developed. In an independent data set integrated from five small data sets, the predicted responders had a significantly higher 5-year survival rate than the predicted non-responders if and only if they received platinum-based ACT (log-rank P=0.0006). The predicted responders showed a 22% absolute benefit of platinum-based ACT in 5-year survival rate compared with untreated patients (log-rank P=0.0019).Conclusions:The REO-based signature can individually predict response to platinum-based ACT with concordant survival benefit directly for LUAD samples measured by different laboratories.

The progression of cancer is accompanied by the acquisition of stemness features. Many stemness evaluation methods based on transcriptional profiles have been presented to reveal the relationship between stemness and cancer. However, instead of absolute stemness index values—the values with certain range—these methods gave the values without range, which makes them unable to intuitively evaluate the stemness. Besides, these indices were based on the absolute expression values of genes, which were found to be seriously influenced by batch effects and the composition of samples in the dataset. Recently, we have showed that the signatures based on the relative expression orderings (REOs) of gene pairs within a sample were highly robust against these factors, which makes that the REO-based signatures have been stably applied in the evaluations of the continuous scores with certain range. Here, we provided an absolute REO-based stemness index to evaluate the stemness. We found that this stemness index had higher correlation with the culture time of the differentiated stem cells than the previous stemness index. When applied to the cancer and normal tissue samples, the stemness index showed its significant difference between cancers and normal tissues and its ability to reveal the intratumor heterogeneity at stemness level. Importantly, higher stemness index was associated with poorer prognosis and greater oncogenic dedifferentiation reflected by histological grade. All results showed the capability of the REO-based stemness index to assist the assignment of tumor grade and its potential therapeutic and diagnostic implications.

Refractive change and incidence of myopia among a group of highly selected senior high school students in China: a prospective study in an aviation cadet prerecruitment class.