Investment is a sector that plays an important role in economic growth in a country. Indonesia is a country that has enormous economic potential to attract investors to invest, but has not been able to create a conducive investment climate. The existence of the COVID-19 pandemic has further exacerbated the decline in investment in Indonesia. This is due to various tight restrictions, the complexity of managing licensing and regulations that still overlap between the center and the regions. The research method used is juridical normative which is based on secondary legal materials. This study uses an approach: statute approach, and conceptual approach. The technique of searching for legal materials uses the document study technique (library research), and the analysis of the study uses qualitative analysis. The results of this study indicate that the Government has made maximum efforts by issuing various regulations or policies in order to revive the investment climate in Indonesia so that the country's economic growth can increase, and is able to guarantee legal certainty in doing business in Indonesia.
LPD as one of the MicroFinance Institutions is very rapidly growing in Bali Province. LPD is said to be the business center of the informal sector. The existence of LPD as a credit institution in the village has been recognized based on customary law. In 2020 LPD in Bali amounted to about 1,433 LPD from a total of 1,485 Indigenous Villages in Bali which more served loans for villagers for various purposes. Therefore, in the management of LPD must be managed properly, correctly, transparency so that there is no misuse of LPD in its management and designation. The research method used in this research is normative-empirical legal research. This research is a blend of normative legal research and empirical legal research. Normative legal research is legal research that uses secondary data, while empirical legal research is legal research that uses primary data. Based on the results of this pre-study can be concluded the occurrence of criminal acts of corruption committed both the Board and lpd managers cause disputes. Disputes conducted by lpd managers and managers cause conflicts of interest either between the manager with customary karma or between managers and managers both in the duties and functions of their authority. Disputes over customary issues in the Village within the scope of LPD either indicated that cause village losses or violations of applicable laws and regulations are often resolved through national law compared to customary law that applies in an LPD area. LPD sebagai salah satu Lembaga Keuangan Mikro sangatlah berkembang pesat di Provinsi Bali. LPD dikatakan sebagai pusat usaha sektor informal. Eksistensi LPD sebagai lembaga perkreditan di desa telah diakui keberadaannya berdasarkan hukum adat. Tahun 2020 LPD di Bali berjumlah sekitar 1.433 LPD dari total 1.485 Desa Adat di Bali yang lebih banyak melayani pinjaman bagi masyarakat desa untuk berbagai keperluan. Oleh karena itu didalam pengurusan LPD haruslah dikelola dengan baik, benar, transparansi agar tidak terjadi penyalahgunaan LPD di dalam pengelolaan dan peruntukannya. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif-empiris. Penelitian ini merupakan perpaduan antara penelitian hukum normatif dan penelitian hukum empiris. Penelitian hukum normatif adalah penelitian hukum yang menggunakan data sekunder, sedangkan penelitian hukum empiris adalah penelitian hukum yang menggunakan data primer. Berdasarkan hasil pra penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan terjadinya tindak pidana korupsi yang dilakukan baik itu Pengurus dan pengelola LPD menimbulkan sengketa. Sengketa yang dilakukan oleh Pengurus dan pengelola LPD menimbulkan konflik kepentingan baik antara pengurus dengan karma adat atau antar pengurus dan pengelola baik dalam tugas dan fungsi kewenangannya. Sengketa permasalahan adat di Desa dalam ruang lingkup LPD baik itu terindikasi yang menimbulkan kerugian desa ataupun pelanggaran Peraturan Perundang Undangan yang berlaku seringkali sengketa tersebut diselesaikan melalui hukum Nasional dibandingkan dengan hukum adat yang berlaku di suatu wilayah LPD.
The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of regional regulation number 2 of year 2000 regarding prostitution in the village of Sanur Kauh and to find out the obstacles faced in terms of eradicating commercial sex workers in the village of Sanur Kauh. In this study data analysis is not offside the scope of the sample. This research is deductive, based on theories or general concepts. Descriptive approach is intended to describe the phenomena that exist, both natural phenomena and man-made phenomena. Social facts will be obtained from a breakdown of the activities, behavior, actions of people as well as the overall possibility of interpersonal interaction, then presented to others more clearly about what is obtained from the field. The Village Government took persuasive action, approached community leaders in the Sanur Kauh Village, so that they can help the village government to disseminate the negative impacts of prostitution. Then the City Government and Village Government work together to eradicate the practice of prostitution.
The judge's interpretation of the novelty principle, where the Panel of Judges in industrial design disputes argues that an industrial design can be said to be new if it has undergone a significant change in visual appearance, meaning that the visual appearance of the two objects is very different. If not, then the modification of a product cannot be called new so that it cannot be considered as an industrial design. The problems of this research include: how is the regulation of product novelty in the registration of industrial designs in Law Number 31 of 2000 and how is the legal protection of designers against the concept of novelty of products in the legal system in Indonesia. This type of research used in discussing the problem of this research is normative legal research. The conclusions of this research are as follows: Regulations on Product Newness in the Registration of Industrial Designs in Law Number 31 of 2000, among others, are in Article 9. And legal remedies are contained in Article 54 of Law Number 31 of 2000. Legal protection of designers against the concept of product novelty In the legal system in Indonesia, among others: Preventive protection: This protection is also closely related to the awareness of the owner of the industrial design rights themselves to register their industrial designs in order to get protection from the State. Regressive protection for holders of Industrial Design Rights is protection that is carried out directly to resolve or overcome an event or incident that has occurred in the form of a violation of the right to industrial design. Penafsiran terhadap penerapan prinsip kebaruan (novelty) oleh hakim, dimana Majelis Hakim dalam sengketa desain industri berpendapat bahwa sebuah desain industri dapat dikatakan baru apabila telah mengalami perubahan penampakan visual yang signifikan, artinya penampakan visual kedua benda tersebut menjadi sangat berbeda. Bila tidak, maka modifikasi suatu produk tersebut tidak dapat disebut baru sehingga tidak dapat dianggap sebagai suatu desain industri. Permasalahan penelitian ini antara lain: bagaimanakah Pengaturan tentang Kebaharuan Produk dalam Pendaftaran Desain Industri pada Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2000 dan bagaimanakah Perlindungan Hukum Pendesain terhadap konsep kebaharuan produk dalam sistem hukum di Indonesia. Jenis penelitian yang dipergunakan dalam membahas masalah penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Simpulan penelitian ini sebagai berikut: Pengaturan tentang Kebaharuan Produk dalam Pendaftaran Desain Industri pada Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2000 antara lain dalam Pasal 9. Dan upaya hukum tertuang dalam Pasal 54 Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2000.Perlindungan Hukum Pendesain terhadap konsep kebaharuan produk dalam sistem hukum di Indonesia antara lain :Perlindungan preventif : Perlindungan ini juga sangat berkaitan dengan kesadaran dari pemilik hak desain industri itu sendiri untuk mendaftarkan desain industrinya agar mendapatkan perlindungan dari Negara. Perlindungan refresif bagi pemegang Hak Desain Industri adalah perlindungan yang dilakukan secara langsung untuk menyelesaikan atau memanggulangi suatu peristiwa atau kejadian yang telah terjadi berupa pelanggaran hak atas desain industri.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.