No abstract

Brain injury in the premature infant is associated with a high risk of neurodevelopmental disability. Previous small-animal models of brain injury attributable to extreme prematurity typically fail to generate a spectrum of pathology and behavior that closely resembles that observed in humans, although they provide initial answers to numerous cellular, molecular, and therapeutic questions. We tested the hypothesis that exposure of rats to repeated hypoxia from postnatal day 1 (P1) to P3 models the characteristic white matter neuropathological injury, gray matter volume loss, and memory deficits seen in children born extremely prematurely. Male Sprague Dawley rats were exposed to repeated hypoxia or repeated normoxia from P1 to P3. The absolute number of pre-oligodendrocytes and mature oligodendrocytes, the surface area and g-ratio of myelin, the absolute volume of cerebral white and gray matter, and the absolute number of cerebral neurons were quantified stereologically. Spatial memory was investigated on a radial arm maze. Rats exposed to repeated hypoxia had a significant loss of (1) pre-oligodendrocytes at P4, (2) cerebral white matter volume and myelin at P14, (3) cerebral cortical and striatal gray matter volume without neuronal loss at P14, and (4) cerebral myelin and memory deficits in adulthood. Decreased myelin was correlated with increased attention deficit hyperactivity disorder-like hyperactivity. This new small-animal model of extreme prematurity generates a spectrum of short-and long-term pathology and behavior that closely resembles that observed in humans. This new rat model provides a clinically relevant tool to investigate numerous cellular, molecular, and therapeutic questions on brain injury attributable to extreme prematurity.

No abstract

Elucidating the link between cellular activity and goal-directed behavior requires a fuller understanding of the mechanisms underlying burst firing in midbrain dopaminergic neurons and those that suppress activity during aversive or non-rewarding events. We have characterized the afferent synaptic connections onto these neurons in the rat substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) and ventral tegmental area (VTA), and compared these findings with cholinergic interneurons and spiny projection neurons in the striatum. We found that the average absolute number of synapses was three to three and one-half times greater onto the somata of dorsal striatal spiny projection neurons than onto the somata of dopaminergic neurons in the SNpc or dorsal striatal cholinergic interneurons. A similar comparison between populations of dopamine neurons revealed a two times greater number of somatic synapses on VTA dopaminergic neurons than SNpc dopaminergic neurons. The percentage of symmetrical, presumably inhibitory, synaptic inputs on somata was significantly higher on spiny projection neurons and cholinergic interneurons compared with SNpc dopaminergic neurons. Synaptic data on the primary dendrites yielded similar significant differences for the percentage of symmetrical synapses for VTA dopaminergic vs. striatal neurons. No differences in the absolute number or type of somatic synapses were evident for dopaminergic neurons in the SNpc of Wistar vs. Sprague-Dawley rat strains. These data from identified neurons are pivotal for interpreting their electrophysiological responses to afferent activity and for generating realistic computer models of neuronal networks of striatal and midbrain dopaminergic function.

Background: The measurement of anti-drug antibody (ADA) levels in adalimumab (ADAL)-treated and infliximab (IFX)-treated patients is critical for guiding therapeutic strategies. The homogeneous mobility shift assay (HMSA) and affinity capture elution (ACE) assay provide effective, drug-tolerant formats for measuring total ADA levels. However, their ability to discriminate between ADA from samples with or without neutralizing capacity is unclear and therefore was analyzed in this study. Methods: Sera from ADAL and IFX patients with low drug levels (<1 mcg/mL) were analyzed by ACE, HMSA, and bridging assay. Neutralizing capacity was determined by competitive ligand-binding assay. Results: HMSA and ACE detected high ADA levels in all ADAL (19/42) and IFX (27/64) samples with neutralizing capacity. ADA was also detected in most of the samples without neutralizing capacity, but levels were significantly lower (P < 0.0001). Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that for both assays, ADA levels were a strong discriminatory marker of neutralizing ADA (area under the curve > 0.9, P < 0.0001). Using a signal >8× background as a cut-point, neutralizing ADA could be identified with high specificity (HMSA > 95%, ACE > 85%) and sensitivity (HMSA > 70%, ACE > 80%). The detection of multimeric drug–ADA complexes after HMSA was also a highly specific marker (specificity > 95%) of neutralizing ADA in both ADAL and IFX patients. Results using ACE and HMSA were highly correlated. Conclusions: Results obtained after HMSA and ACE analysis are strongly correlated, and in both assays, high ADA levels are a specific marker of neutralizing capacity. The detection of multimeric complexes by HMSA also selectively identifies sera with neutralizing capacity. These data support the use of these assays as quantitative rather than simple qualitative measures of ADA.