PurposeThe purposes of this paper are to examine the actual conditions of the problems of poverty in rural areas in Inner Mongolia, to clarify the problems involved in the measure to fight poverty through promotion of dairy farming and to propose policies for future measures to fight poverty.Design/methodology/approachBoth quantitative and qualitative analyses are employed, such as the estimation of production functions of agriculture in Inner Mongolia over the period 1998‐2004, the interview analysis and questionnaire survey for case studies. The different roles that three models play in poverty reduction such as the government assistant dairy farming, the enterprise entry dairy farming, and the multiple management dairy farming are discussed.FindingsThe paper confirms the growth of the corporate‐participating dairy farming contributes significantly to the development of the regions. It also clarifies the problem of the government‐aided dairy farming with its low profitability caused by insufficient input of fodder and the necessity to select management policies according to the natural conditions and resources available in individual regions, such as a shift toward recycling‐oriented beef cattle management in multiple dairy farming.Originality/valueThe paper adds insight into the promotion of dairy farming and poverty reduction in Inner Mongolia.
From a conventional viewpoint of regional economics and urban planning, agriculture and farmland were previously considered to conflict with urbanization. However, in recent years, urban agriculture is actively designed and incorporated into urban sustainable development. One reason for such development is that the multi-functionality of agriculture and farmland has started to attract attention. In the light of this multi-functionality, agriculture supplies not only agriculture goods but also local public goods and farmland can be seen not only as space to support agriculture but also as space with many other functions.Therefore, the multi-functionality of urban agriculture and farmland is considered to impact the quality of urban resident life. However, expectations of urban residents for the functions of urban agriculture vary from place to place. Moreover,the relative importance of the three key elements for sustainable development of urban agriculture, i.e. economic efficiency, sociality and environment protection, also vary from place to place.In this study,an internet survey method was used. The aims were to clarify the functions of urban agriculture expected by urban residents and discuss the sustainability of urban agriculture through a comparative analysis on the assessments of urban agriculture by the residents in Shanghai and Harbin, China.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.