IntroductionInterest in the function of the inferior parietal lobule (IPL) has resulted in increased understanding of its involvement in visuospatial and cognitive functioning, and its role in semantic networks. A basic understanding of the nuanced white‐matter anatomy in this region may be useful in improving outcomes when operating in this region of the brain. We sought to derive the surgical relationship between the IPL and underlying major white‐matter bundles by characterizing macroscopic connectivity.MethodsData of 10 healthy adult controls from the Human Connectome Project were used for tractography analysis. All IPL connections were mapped in both hemispheres, and distances were recorded between cortical landmarks and major tracts. Ten postmortem dissections were then performed using a modified Klingler technique to serve as ground truth.ResultsWe identified three major types of connections of the IPL. (1) Short association fibers connect the supramarginal and angular gyri, and connect both of these gyri to the superior parietal lobule. (2) Fiber bundles from the IPL connect to the frontal lobe by joining the superior longitudinal fasciculus near the termination of the Sylvian fissure. (3) Fiber bundles from the IPL connect to the temporal lobe by joining the middle longitudinal fasciculus just inferior to the margin of the superior temporal sulcus.ConclusionsWe present a summary of the relevant anatomy of the IPL as part of a larger effort to understand the anatomic connections of related networks. This study highlights the principle white‐matter pathways and highlights key underlying connections.

No abstract

OBJECTIVE The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) is understood to have a role in outcome evaluation and risk assessment and is commonly involved with infiltrative tumors. A detailed understanding of the exact location and nature of associated white matter tracts could significantly improve postoperative morbidity related to declining capacity. Through diffusion tensor imaging-based fiber tracking validated by gross anatomical dissection as ground truth, the authors have characterized these connections based on relationships to other well-known structures. METHODS Diffusion imaging from the Human Connectome Project for 10 healthy adult controls was used for tractography analysis. The OFC was evaluated as a whole based on connectivity with other regions. All OFC tracts were mapped in both hemispheres, and a lateralization index was calculated with resultant tract volumes. Ten postmortem dissections were then performed using a modified Klingler technique to demonstrate the location of major tracts. RESULTS The authors identified 3 major connections of the OFC: a bundle to the thalamus and anterior cingulate gyrus, passing inferior to the caudate and medial to the vertical fibers of the thalamic projections; a bundle to the brainstem, traveling lateral to the caudate and medial to the internal capsule; and radiations to the parietal and occipital lobes traveling with the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus. CONCLUSIONS The OFC is an important center for processing visual, spatial, and emotional information. Subtle differences in executive functioning following surgery for frontal lobe tumors may be better understood in the context of the fiber-bundle anatomy highlighted by this study.

No abstract

The diagnosis of glioblastoma (GBM) often carries a dismal prognosis, with a median survival of 14.6 months. A particular challenge is the diagnosis of GBM in the elderly population (age > 75 years), who have significant comorbidities, present with worse functional status, and are at higher risk with surgical treatments. We sought to evaluate the impact of current GBM treatment, specifically in the elderly population. The authors undertook a retrospective review of all patients aged 75 or older who underwent treatment for GBM from 1997 to 2016. Patient outcomes were evaluated with regards to demographics, surgical variables, postoperative treatment, and complications. A total of 82 patients (mean age 80.5 ± 3.8 years) were seen. Most patients presented with confusion (57.3%) and associated comorbidities, and prior anticoagulation use was common in this age group. Extent of resection (EOR) included no surgery (9.8%), biopsy (22.0%), subtotal resection (40.2%), and gross-total resection (23.2%). Postoperative adjuvant therapy included temozolomide (36.1%), radiation (52.5%), and bevacizumab (11.9%). A mean overall survival of 6.3 ± 1.2 months was observed. There were 34 complications in 23 patients. Improved survival was seen with increased EOR only for patients without postoperative complications. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model showed that complications (HR = 5.43, 95% CI 1.73, 17.04, p = 0.004) predicted poor outcome. Long-term survivors (> 12 months survival) and short-term survivors had similar median preoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score (80 vs. 80, p = 0.43), but long-term survivors had unchanged postoperative KPS (80 vs. 60, p = 0.02) and no complications (0/9 vs. 23/72, p = 0.04). The benefit of glioblastoma treatment in our series was limited by the postoperative complications and KPS. Presence of a complication served as an independent risk factor for worsened overall survival in this age group. It is likely that decreased patient function limits postoperative adjuvant therapy and predisposes to higher morbidity especially in this age group.