Intervention participants performed better on dual-task activities and had better postural balance and greater functional capacity than controls.
Both training protocols improved muscle strength, but only RTI improved the mobility, motor signs, cognitive impairment, and quality of life, likely because of the usage of high motor complexity exercises. Thus, RTI may be recommended as an innovative adjunct therapeutic intervention for patients with PD.
Background Declines in gait parameters are common with aging and more pronounced in tasks with increased executive demand. However, the neural correlates of age-related gait impairments are not fully understood yet. Objectives To investigate ( a) the effects of aging on prefrontal cortex (PFC) activity and gait parameters during usual walking, obstacle crossing and dual-task walking and ( b) the association between PFC activity and measures of gait and executive function. Methods Eighty-eight healthy individuals were distributed into 6 age-groups: 20-25 (G20), 30-35 (G30), 40-45 (G40), 50-55 (G50), 60-65 (G60), and 70-75 years (G70). Participants walked overground under 3 conditions: usual walking, obstacle crossing, and dual-task walking. Changes in oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin in the PFC were recorded using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Gait spatiotemporal parameters were assessed using an electronic walkway. Executive function was assessed through validated tests. Results Between-group differences on PFC activity were observed for all conditions. Multiple groups (ie, G30, G50, G60, and G70) showed increased PFC activity in at least one of the walking conditions. Young adults (G20 and G30) had the lowest levels of PFC activity while G60 had the highest levels. Only G70 showed reduced executive function and gait impairments (which were more pronounced during obstacle crossing and dual-task walking). PFC activity was related to gait and executive function. Conclusions Aging causes a gradual increase in PFC activity during walking. This compensatory mechanism may reach the resource ceiling in the 70s, when reduced executive function limits its efficiency and gait impairments are observed.
The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of muscle fatigue in active and inactive young adults on the kinematic and kinetic parameters of normal gait and obstacle crossing. Twenty male subjects were divided into active (10) and inactive (10), based on self-reported physical activity. Participants performed three trials of two tasks (normal gait and obstacle crossing) before and after a fatigue protocol, consisting of repeated sit-to-stand transfers until the instructed pace could no longer be maintained. MANOVAs were used to compare dependent variables with the following factors: physical activity level, fatigue and task. The endurance time in the fatigue protocol was lower for the inactive group. Changes of gait parameters with fatigue, among which increased step width and increased stride speed were the most consistent, were independent of task and physical activity level. These findings indicate that the kinematic and kinetic parameters of gait are affected by muscle fatigue irrespective of the physical activity level of the subjects and type of gait. Inactive individuals used a slightly different strategy than active individuals when crossing an obstacle, independently of muscle fatigue.
RESUMOObjetivo: Comparar o risco de quedas entre idosos com doença de Parkinson (DP), demência de Alzheimer (DA) e saudáveis (controle). Além disso, pretendeu-se analisar as relações do risco de quedas com declínio cognitivo e com nível de atividade física. Método: vinte idosos, sendo sete com DP (69,57 ± 2,40 anos), seis com DA (77,5 ± 2,32 anos) e sete saudáveis (74,71 ± 2,58 anos), foram avaliados por meio dos seguintes instrumentos: Escala de Equilíbrio Funcional de Berg (EEFB), Timed Up and Go test (TUG), Mini-Exame do Estado Mental (MEEM) e Questionário Baecke Modificado para Idosos (QBMI). Resultados: O teste de Kruskal-Wallis apontou diferença significativa entre os grupos, tanto em relação à EEFB (KW=9,67, p<0,01), quanto em relação ao TUG (KW=9,14, p<0,01, para tempo despendido, e KW=10,04, p<0,01, para número de passos). A "análise aos pares" do teste post-hoc de Bonferroni apontou comprometimento maior do equilíbrio no grupo DA, no qual também foram observados menores valores no MEEM. O grupo DP foi caracterizado por apresentar um maior nível de atividade física. A análise de correlação de Spearman apontou correlação baixa entre MEEM e EEFB (r s =0,59); entre MEEM e TUG (r s =-0,62 e r s =-0,52); entre QBMI e EEFB (r s =0,54); e entre QBMI e TUG (r s =-0,39 e r s =-0,42). Conclusões: As baixas correlações observadas devem ser analisadas com cautela, pois tais variáveis sofrem influência de múltiplos fatores. No grupo DA, o declínio cognitivo pode estar relacionado ao maior risco de quedas e, no grupo DP, a atividade física pode ter auxiliado a manter um risco de quedas próximo ao grupo controle.Palavras-chave: risco de quedas, doença de Parkinson, demência de Alzheimer. ABSTRACT Risk of Falls Among Elderly People with Parkinson's Disease and Alzheimer's Dementia: A Cross-Sectional StudyObjective: To compare the risk of falls among elderly people with Parkinson's disease (PD) and Alzheimer's dementia (AD) and among healthy peers (controls). In addition, the aim was to analyze relationships between risk of falls and cognitive decay and between risk of falls and physical activity. Method: Twenty subjects were assessed: seven with PD (69.57 ± 2.40 years), six with AD (77.5 ± 2.32 years) and seven healthy peers (74.71 ± 2.58 years). The following instruments were used: Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Timed Up and Go test (TUG), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Modified Baecke Questionnaire for Older Adults (MBQOA). Results: The Kruskal-Wallis (KW) test indicated significant differences between the groups, relating to BBS (KW = 9.67, p<0.01) and TUG (KW = 9.14, p<0.01, for time expended, and KW = 10.04, p<0.01, for number of steps). Bonferroni post--hoc pairs analysis showed that balance was highly compromised in the AD group, such that lower MMSE values were observed. The PD group was characterized by presenting higher levels of physical activity. Spearman's test produced low correlations between MMSE and BBS (r s =0.59); MMSE and TUG (r s =-0.52 and r s =-0.62); MBQOA and BBS (r s =0.54); and MBQOA and...
Resistance training with instability (RTI) uses exercises with high motor complexity that impose high postural control and cognitive demands that may be important for improving postural instability and fear of falling in subjects with Parkinson's disease (PD). Here, we hypothesized that: 1) RTI will be more effective than resistance training (RT) in improving balance (Balance Evaluation Systems Test [BESTest] and overall stability index [Biodex Balance System]) and fear of falling (Falls Efficacy Scale-International [FES-I] score) of subjects with Parkinson's disease (PD); and 2) changes in BESTest and FES-I after RTI will be associated with changes in cognitive function (Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA] score - previously published) induced by RTI. Thirty-nine subjects with moderate PD were randomly assigned to a nonexercising control, RT, and RTI groups. While RT and RTI groups performed progressive RT twice a week for 12 weeks, the RTI group added progressive unstable devices to increase motor complexity of the resistance exercises. There were significant group × time interactions for BESTest, overall stability index, and FES-I scores (P < 0.05). Only RTI improved BESTest, overall stability index and FES-I scores, and RTI was more effective than RT in improving biomechanical constraints and stability in gait (BESTest sections) at post-training (P < 0.05). There were strong correlations between relative changes in BESTest and MoCA (r = 0.72, P = 0.005), and FES-I and MoCA (r = -0.75, P = 0.003) after RTI. Due to the increased motor complexity in RTI, RTI is recommended for improving balance and fear of falling, which are associated with improvement in cognitive function of PD.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.