Rationale Nitrate-rich beetroot juice has been shown to improve exercise capacity in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF), but studies using pharmacologic preparations of inorganic nitrate are lacking. Objectives To determine: (1) the dose-response effect of potassium nitrate (KNO3) on exercise capacity; (2) the population-specific pharmacokinetic and safety profile of KNO3 in HFpEF. Methods and Results We randomized 12 subjects with HFpEF to oral KNO3 (n=9) or potassium chloride (KCl, n=3). Subjects received 6mmol twice-daily during Week-1, followed by 6mmol thrice-daily during Week-2. Supine cycle ergometry was performed at baseline (Visit 1) and after each week (Visits 2&3). Quality of life (QOL) was assessed with the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). The primary efficacy outcome, peak O2-uptake, did not significantly improve (P=0.13). Exploratory outcomes included exercise duration and quality of life. Exercise duration increased significantly with KNO3 (Visit 1: 9.87 [95%CI=9.31–10.43]; Visit 2: 10.73 [95%CI=10.13–11.33]; Visit 3: 11.61 [95%CI=11.05–12.17] minutes, P=0.002). Improvements in the KCCQ total symptom (Visit 1: 58.0 [95%CI=52.5–63.5], Visit 2: 66.8 [95%CI=61.3–72.3]; Visit 3: 70.8 [95%CI=65.3–76.3], P=0.016) and functional status scores (Visit 1: 62.2 [95%CI=58.5–66.0], Visit 2: 68.6 [95%CI=64.9–72.3], Visit 3: 71.1 [95%CI=67.3–74.8]; P=0.01) were seen after KNO3. Pronounced elevations in trough levels of nitric oxide metabolites (NOm) occurred with KNO3 (Visit 2: 199.5 [95%CI=98.7–300.2]; Visit 3: 471.8 [95%CI=377.8–565.8]) versus baseline (Visit 1: 38.0 [95%CI=0.00–132.0] μM; P<0.001). KNO3 did not lead to clinically-significant hypotension or methemoglobinemia. Following 6 mmol of KNO3, systolic blood pressure was reduced by a maximum of 17.9 (95%CI −28.3-[−7.6]) mmHg 3.75 hours later. Peak NOm concentrations were 259.3 (95%CI 176.2–342.4) μM 3.5 hours after ingestion, and the median half-life was 73.0 (IQR 33.4–232.0) minutes. Conclusions KNO3 is potentially well-tolerated and improves exercise duration and QOL in HFpEF. This study reinforces the efficacy of KNO3 and suggests that larger randomized trials are warranted. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02256345; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02256345
BackgroundStable plasma nitric oxide (NO) metabolites (NOM), composed predominantly of nitrate and nitrite, are attractive biomarkers of NO bioavailability. NOM levels integrate the influence of NO‐synthase‐derived NO production/metabolism, dietary intake of inorganic nitrate/nitrite, and clearance of NOM. Furthermore, nitrate and nitrite, the most abundant NOM, can be reduced to NO via the nitrate‐nitrite‐NO pathway.Methods and ResultsWe compared serum NOM among subjects without heart failure (n=126), subjects with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; n=43), and subjects with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; n=32). LV mass and extracellular volume fraction were measured with cardiac MRI. Plasma NOM levels were measured after reduction to NO via reaction with vanadium (III)/hydrochloric acid. Subjects with HFpEF demonstrated significantly lower unadjusted levels of NOM (8.0 μmol/L; 95% CI 6.2–10.4 μmol/L; ANOVA P=0.013) than subjects without HF (12.0 μmol/L; 95% CI 10.4–13.9 μmol/L) or those with HFrEF (13.5 μmol/L; 95% CI 9.7–18.9 μmol/L). There were no significant differences in NOM between subjects with HFrEF and subjects without HF. In a multivariable model that adjusted for age, sex, race, diabetes mellitus, body mass index, current smoking, systolic blood pressure, and glomerular filtration rate, HFpEF remained a predictor of lower NOM (β=−0.43; P=0.013). NOM did not correlate with LV mass, or LV diffuse fibrosis.Conclusions HFpEF, but not HFrEF, is associated with reduced plasma NOM, suggesting greater endothelial dysfunction, enhanced clearance, or deficient dietary ingestion of inorganic nitrate. Our findings may underlie the salutary effects of inorganic nitrate supplementation demonstrated in recent clinical trials in HFpEF.
Introduction: The 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines lowered the threshold for blood pressure goals and emphasized incorporation of cardiovascular risk assessment and lifestyle modifications. Due to this update, the prevalence of hypertension increased from 31.9% to 45.6% of Americans. We hypothesized that our patients were not being assessed and counseled in accordance with the 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines at our resident clinic in New York City. Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of hypertension who had at least one office visit between July to September of 2018 at our clinic were included. Patients not seen by a resident physician were excluded. Variables collected included lowest blood pressure reading from visit, comorbidities, and demographics (age, language, race, and gender). The most recent progress note was reviewed for the assessment of hypertension. Additionally, residents of all levels completed an electronic anonymous survey to assess knowledge of updated guidelines. Results: Of the 206 patients meeting inclusion and not exclusion criteria, 148 (71.8%) were above blood pressure goal. The average blood pressure was 137/82 (CI 95%, 134.7-139.3/80.6-83.4). Of those 148 patients not at goal, 108 (72.97%) were incorrectly identified as at goal or did not have hypertension assessed at all. Of the total 206 patients, only 16 (7.77%) had documented discussion of lifestyle modification and 1 patient (0.5%) had an atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) score in the assessment. Patients with an established resident primary care physician (n=118) were not more likely to meet goal blood pressure (p=0.58) than those who did not. A total of 27 of 78 (34.6%) residents completed the survey, and only 15% (4 of 27) answered all questions correctly. Conclusions: Our hypertensive patients are not meeting their blood pressure goals and often the assessment is insufficient. We are not reliably identifying patients with elevated blood pressure per the 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines and missing opportunities for optimizing care. Enhancing resident understanding of guidelines and evaluation of hypertension is important for meeting blood pressure targets and reducing cardiovascular risk. An intervention to improve resident education and documentation is underway.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.