To determine the role of A disintegrin and metalloproteinase 10 (ADAM10) in genetic susceptibility to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in a representative Chinese sample, we genotyped 362 AD patients and 370 healthy controls for the rs514049A/C and rs653765C/T polymorphisms in the ADAM10 promoter using the SNaPshot technique. We also examined the potential impact of these polymorphisms on the plasma level of soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products (sRAGE), a decoy receptor whose reduction has been associated with a higher risk of AD. Additionally, a meta-analysis was performed using the present study and the largest GWAS from the International Genomics of Alzheimer’s Project (IGAP). No significant differences were found in the distributions of genotypes or alleles between AD patients and control subjects. However, age-at-onset stratification analysis revealed that there were significant differences in the genotypes (P = 0.015) and alleles (P = 0.006) of the rs653765 SNP. Furthermore, patients with the rs653765 CC genotype showed a lower ADAM10 level and a faster cognitive deterioration than those in patients with the CT/TT genotype in late-onset AD (LOAD), and the rs653765 CC polymorphism was able to regulate the production of the ADAM10 substrate sRAGE. In contrast, the rs514049 polymorphism was not statistically associated with AD. In the meta-analysis, we observed that both rs514049 (A allele vs. C allele, P = 0.002) and rs653765 (C allele vs. T allele, P = 0.004) were associated with AD risk. The present study indicated that the rs653765 polymorphism might be associated with the risk and development of LOAD; in particular, the risk genotype, CC, may decrease the expression of ADAM10, influencing the plasma levels of sRAGE, and thus may be correlated with the clinical progression of AD.

No abstract

Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located in the promoter region of the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) gene have been linked to the activity of RAGE. However, contrary to our expectation, we previously detected no correlation between SNPs within the RAGE promoter and ulcerative colitis (UC) risk in a case-control study. Here, we investigated the methylation of the RAGE promoter and analyzed the collective contribution of methylation and SNPs to UC risk. We found that RAGE promoter hypomethylation was more common in UC patients compared to controls (70% vs. 30%, respectively), as determined via bisulfite sequencing PCR (BSP) and methylation-specific PCR (MSP). Furthermore, we investigated the cooperativity of promoter methylation and SNPs and found that either of two SNPs (rs1800624 or rs1800625) and promoter methylation jointly contributed to UC risk (30 UC patients vs. 30 controls, P < 0.05). There was no correlation between UC risk and either methylation or SNPs when analyzed separately. This lack of correlation is likely due to promoter methylation repressing gene transcription, whereas SNPs in the RAGE promoter region activate RAGE transcription. We found that variant allele carriers with promoter hypomethylation were at an increased risk for UC (rs1800624, OR = 10, 95% CI: 1.641–60.21, P = 0.009; rs1800625, OR = 4.8, 95% CI: 1.074–21.447, P = 0.039). Furthermore, our data revealed that the RAGE mRNA levels in variant allele carriers with promoter hypomethylation were significantly higher compared to those with promoter hypermethylation (P < 0.05) as well as to those in wild-type allele individuals exhibiting promoter hypomethylation (P < 0.05). We therefore speculate that the methylation status and SNPs present in the RAGE promoter region alter RAGE transcription, thereby impacting UC risk. We also propose that the methylation status and RAGE promoter genotype could jointly serve as clinical biomarkers to assist in UC risk assessment.