No abstract

No abstract

The deployment of hydrogen technologies in the energy mix and the use of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles (FCV) are expected to significantly reduce European greenhouse emissions. We carry out a social cost-benefit analysis to estimate the period of socio-economic conversion, period for which the replacement of gasoline internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEV) by FCV becomes socio-economically profitable. In this study, we considered a hydrogen production mix of five technologies: natural gas reforming processes with or without carbon capture and storage, electrolysis, biogas processes and on-site production.We estimate two external costs: the abatement cost of CO 2 through FCV and the use of non-renewable resources in the manufacture of fuel cells by measuring platinum depletion. We forecast that carbon market could finance approximately 10 % of the deployment cost of hydrogen-based transport and that an early economic conversion could be targeted for FCV. Almost ten years could be saved by considering externalities. 1

In the evolution toward a “carbon-neutral” energy economy, among the most promising solutions for replacing today’s greenhouse gas (GHG)-emitting vehicles is the use of hydrogen as an energy carrier. In the pathway toward a future infrastructure based on renewable energy sources, a medium-term step would rely on the use of fossil fuels for on-site production of hydrogen, feeding small fleets of fuel cell vehicles. Great interest is on natural gas as a primary source because of its high hydrogen/carbon ratio. State of the art technology for the production of hydrogen from natural gas includes a series of reacting steps typically involving steam reforming (at 800 °C or above), a water-gas shift reactor, and a final purification of hydrogen through pressure swing adsorption (PSA). An alternative that has been the subject of growing interest is the use of thin (2–50 μm thick) Pd-alloy materials as hydrogen perm-selective membranes for the embedded extraction of pure hydrogen from the chemical reactor; this system is usually known as the “membrane reactor”. This paper studies the adoption of palladium-based membrane reactor technologies for pure hydrogen production from natural gas. In particular, three system layouts are analyzed and compared to the traditional option: (i) autothermal reforming membrane reactor, (ii) steam reforming membrane reactor (externally heated), and (iii) water-gas shift membrane reactor downstream of a steam reformer. The comparison is made in terms of performances and techno-economic considerations for the design of compact systems for on-site production of hydrogen at filling stations. The systems are designed for 50 m3/h (1766 cfh) of hydrogen, which corresponds to refilling 25 vehicles a day with 4 kg of hydrogen (approximately 418 km driving range on fuel cell vehicles with a 70 MPa storage tank).

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract