2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.02.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study of steam methane reforming in a Pd-based fluidized bed membrane reactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these membranes could work at 700 C or even higher temperatures according to the manufacturer, the maximum working temperature without damage depends on the applied pressure drop on both sides of the membrane. To illustrate this, the maximum reported temperature at which similar membranes have been tested without deteriorating the perm-selectivity to hydrogen along the time on stream is 650 C [37,38].…”
Section: Effect Of Temperature On H 2 Permeationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although these membranes could work at 700 C or even higher temperatures according to the manufacturer, the maximum working temperature without damage depends on the applied pressure drop on both sides of the membrane. To illustrate this, the maximum reported temperature at which similar membranes have been tested without deteriorating the perm-selectivity to hydrogen along the time on stream is 650 C [37,38].…”
Section: Effect Of Temperature On H 2 Permeationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In turn, this resulted in higher CaF 2 production in S‐2 and S‐3, where reactors are connected in series, compared to S‐1, where a single reactor is used. Although this phenomenon has been frequently reported for membrane reactors equipped with hydrogen separation membranes for higher hydrogen production, no work, to the best of our knowledge, has been reported for simultaneous CF 4 abatement and utilization. For the same CaF 2 production of 0.0523 kmol h −1 , reduced operating temperatures of 936 K and 894 K were observed in S‐2 and S‐3, respectively, compared with S‐1 and this could lead to possible cost savings through less natural gas required to supply enough heat for the system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This indicates that the best reactor performance is achieved at a high temperature within the boundaries imposed by membrane stability (700 C) and high pressure. Roses, Gallucci, Manzolini, and van Sint Annaland (2013) concluded that in terms of hydrogen yield, it would be convenient to use an S/C ratio in the range of 2.5e3.0 but not higher. No trace of CO was detected in the permeate hydrogen even at temperatures of 630 C using Pd membranes.…”
Section: Steam Reforming With Membranesmentioning
confidence: 97%