We have compared the cancer cell cytotoxicity, cell uptake, and DNA binding properties of the isomeric terphenyl complexes [(eta(6)-arene)Ru(en)Cl](+), where the arene is ortho- (2), meta- (3), or para-terphenyl (1) (o-, m-, or p-terp). Complex 1, the X-ray crystal structure of which confirms that it has the classical "piano-stool" geometry, has a similar potency to cisplatin but is not cross-resistant and has a much higher activity than 2 or 3. The extent of Ru uptake into A2780 or A2780cis cells does not correlate with potency. Complex 1 binds to DNA rapidly and quantitatively, preferentially to guanine residues, and causes significant DNA unwinding. Circular and linear dichroism, competitive binding experiments with ethidium bromide, DNA melting, and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopic data are consistent with combined intercalative and monofunctional (coordination) binding mode of complex 1. This unusual DNA binding mode may therefore make a major contribution to the high potency of complex 1.

No abstract

The cellular mechanism of action of an iridium(III) half-sandwich complex [(η(5)-C5Me4C6H4C6H5)Ir(phen)Cl]PF6 (phen = phenanthroline) (1) is reported. Complex 1 was used to treat several cell lines, including cisplatin-sensitive, cisplatin-resistant (with intrinsic and acquired resistance) carcinoma cells with wild type p53 status as well as the cells with no intact p53 gene, and nontumorigenic cells. Complex 1 preferentially kills cancer cells over nontumorigenic cells and exhibits no cross-resistance with cisplatin. It appears to retain significant activity in human tumor cell lines that are refractory or poorly responsive to cisplatin, and in contrast to cisplatin it displays a high activity in human tumor cell lines that are characterized by both wild type and mutant p53 gene. The mechanism of cell killing was established through detailed cell-based assays. Complex 1 exhibits dual effects in killing cancer cells causing nuclear DNA damage and mitochondrial dysfunction involving ROS production simultaneously. Flow cytometric studies and impedance-based monitoring of cellular responses to 1 demonstrated that 1 acts more quickly than cisplatin to induce cell death and that 1 is a more effective apoptosis inducer than cisplatin in particular in early stages of treatment, when the apoptotic effects predominate over necrosis. Overall, our findings confirm that 1 and its iridium derivatives represent promising candidates for further pre-clinical studies and new additions to the growing family of nonplatinum metal-based anticancer complexes.

The Pt IV diazido complex trans,trans,trans-[Pt-(N 3 ) 2 (OH) 2 (pyridine) 2 ] (1) is unreactive in the dark but is cytotoxic when photoactivated by UVA and visible light. We have shown that 1 when photoactivated accumulates in tumor cells and binds strongly to nuclear DNA under conditions in which it is toxic to tumor cells. The nature of the DNA adducts, including conformational alterations, induced by photoactivated 1 are distinctly different from those produced in DNA by conventional cisplatin or transplatin. In addition, the observation that major DNA adducts of photoactivated 1 are able to efficiently stall RNA polymerase II more efficiently than cisplatin suggests that transcription inhibition may contribute to the cytotoxicity levels observed for photoactivated 1. Hence, DNA adducts of 1 could trigger a number of downstream cellular effects different from those triggered in cancer cells by DNA adducts of cisplatin. This might lead to the therapeutic effects that could radically improve chemotherapy by platinum complexes. The findings of the present work help to explain the different cytotoxic effects of photoactivated 1 and conventional cisplatin and thereby provide new insights into mechanisms associated with the antitumor effects of platinum complexes photoactivated by UVA and visible light.

Earlier studies have described promising antitumor activity of a large-ring chelate complex [PtCl(2)(cis-1,4-DACH)] (DACH=diaminocyclohexane). Encouraging antitumor activity of this analogue of cisplatin prompted us to perform studies focused on the mechanistic basis of pharmacological effects of this complex. Four early steps in the mechanism of biological activity of cisplatin have been delineated: cell entry, reactions with sulfur-containing compounds, platinum-DNA binding along with processing platinated DNA by proteins (enzymes) and DNA repair. Here, we describe comparative experiments (involving also cisplatin) revealing: (i) improved cytotoxicity (3.4-5.4-fold) of [PtCl(2)(cis-1,4-DACH)] in human tumor ovarian cell lines; (ii) enhanced cellular uptake (approximately 1.5-fold) of [PtCl(2)(cis-1,4-DACH)]; (iii) somewhat enhanced rate of reactions of [PtCl(2)(cis-1,4-DACH)] with glutathione (approximately 1.5-fold), but a similar rate of reactions with metallothionenin-2; (iv) enhanced rate of DNA binding of [PtCl(2)(cis-1,4-DACH)] in cell-free media (approximately 2-fold); (v) similar sequence preference of DNA binding of [PtCl(2)(cis-1,4-DACH)] in cell-free media; (vi) identical DNA interstrand cross-linking efficiency (6%); (vii) similar bending (32 degrees) and enhanced local unwinding (approximately 1.5-fold) induced in DNA by the major 1,2-GG-intrastrand cross-link; (viii) markedly enhanced inhibiting effects of DNA adducts of [PtCl(2)(cis-1,4-DACH)] on processivity of DNA polymerase; and (ix) a slightly lower efficiency of DNA repair systems to remove the adducts of [PtCl(2)(cis-1,4-DACH)] from DNA.

No abstract

No abstract

The new monofunctional Ru(II)-arene complex [(η⁶-arene)Ru(II)(en)Cl]+, where en = 1,2-diaminoethane and the arene is para-terphenyl (complex 1) exhibits promising cytotoxic effects in human tumor cells including those resistant to conventional cisplatin (J. Med. Chem.2008, 51, 5310). The present study is focused on the cellular pharmacology of 1 to elucidate more deeply the mechanisms underlying its antitumor effects. We have identified several cellular mechanisms induced by 1 in human ovarian carcinoma cells, including inhibition of DNA synthesis, overexpression and activation of p53, expression of proapoptotic proteins p21(WAF1) and Bax, G₀/G₁ arrest, and nuclear fragmentation as a result of apoptotic, and, to a much lower extent, also necrotic processes. Thus, 1 inhibits growth of the cancer cells through induction of apoptotic cell death and G₀/G₁ cell cycle arrest. Further investigations have shown that 1 induces apoptosis by regulating the expression of Bcl-2 family proteins. There were significant differences in cellular responses to the treatment with 1 and with conventional cisplatin, particularly in the kinetics and the extent of these responses. In addition, the distinct p53 activation profile of 1 compared with cisplatin provides an explanation for the activity of this ruthenium drug against cisplatin-resistant cells. Hence complex 1 may provide an alternative therapy in patients with acquired cisplatin resistance, particularly with respect to its very low mutagenicity and different mode of action compared to platinum antitumor drugs in clinical use.