The methodology is sufficiently robust to measure and compare pressure ulcer prevalence in different countries. The pressure ulcer prevalence was higher than expected and relatively few patients received adequate prevention. This indicates that more attention to prevention is needed in Europe.

Results Three categories were identified: "Not receiving information or being given the option to participate", "Not being encountered in a professional manner" and "Not receiving nursing or practical support". Insufficient information, insufficient respect and insufficient empathy were described as the most common reasons for a negative professional encounter. ConclusionPatients and relatives experienced unnecessary anxiety and reduced confidence in health care after negative professional encounters. Practice implicationsThe complaints reported to the Patients' Advisory Committee could be used more effectively in health care and be regarded as important evidence when working with quality improvement. To systematically use patient stories, such as those obtained in this report, as a reflective tool in education and supervision could be one way to improve communication and bring new understanding about the patient's perspective in health care. KeywordsComplaints, communication, professional encounter and content analysis. Much research has been done on communication between patients and health professionals. For example, the power of the information communicated by the voice was studied among surgeons, and it was suggested that "how" a message is conveyed may be as important as "what" is said [8]. The physician-patient communication was studied among primary care physicians and surgeons. Physicians with no-claim seemed to conduct longer visits, educate patients more, check understanding more and use more humour during the visit than physicians with claims [9]. A study by Kuzel [10] showed that negative outcomes in the clinician-patient relationship, dominated by stories of disrespect or insensitivity, were reported as more common than technical errors in diagnosis and treatment.The Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) emphasizes that the health care system needs to be more patient-centred and to involve the patients and families in the design of care. Patient-centred care requires respect for patients' values and expressed needs, information and communication, coordination of care, involvement of family, 4 and concordance between the patient and health professionals [11]. Eldh [12] concludes that health care professionals should support patient participation by recognizing the patient as an individual and as a resourceful partner. The benefits of patient-centred care could be that patients are more motivated to follow treatment advice [13] and are more satisfied with health care [14].Patient satisfaction is used as a common quality indicator in health care [15][16]. A problem using patient satisfaction as a quality indicator depends on the complexities where different factors could affect the outcome, and the reliability and validity questioned [17]. Factors such as gratitude, faith and loyalty to health care providers, could influence patient satisfaction [18] as well as background factors such as age, health status and expectations of care [19][20]. A patient's evaluation could be positive, even when care...

The aim of this study was to describe and compare the knowledge of registered nurses (RNs), assistant nurses (ANs) and student nurses (SNs) about preventing pressure ulcers (PUs). PU prevention behaviours in the clinical practice of RNs and ANs were also explored. A descriptive, comparative multicentre study was performed. Hospital wards and universities from four Swedish county councils participated. In total, 415 participants (RN, AN and SN) completed the Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Assessment Tool. The mean knowledge score for the sample was 58·9%. The highest scores were found in the themes 'nutrition' (83·1%) and 'risk assessment' (75·7%). The lowest scores were found in the themes 'reduction in the amount of pressure and shear' (47·5%) and 'classification and observation' (55·5%). RNs and SNs had higher scores than ANs on 'aetiology and causes'. SNs had higher scores than RNs and ANs on 'nutrition'. It has been concluded that there is a knowledge deficit in PU prevention among nursing staff in Sweden. A major educational campaign needs to be undertaken both in hospital settings and in nursing education.

Inter-observer reliability of the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel classification system was low. Evaluation thus needs to focus on both the clarity and complexity of the system. Definitions and unambiguous descriptions of pressure ulcer grades and the distinction between moisture lesions will probably enhance clarity. To simplify the current classification system, a reduction in the number of grades is suggested.

Despite great effort on the national level to encourage the prevention of pressure ulcers, the prevalence is high. Public reporting and benchmarking are now available, evidence-based guidelines have been disseminated and national goals have been set. Strategies for implementing practices outlined in the guidelines, meeting goals and changing attitudes must be further developed.

No abstract

Patient records did not present valid and reliable data about pressure ulcers. There is a need for guidelines to support the care planning process and facilitate the use of research-based knowledge in clinical practice. More attention must be focused on the quality of clinical data to make proper use of electronic patient records in the future.

No abstract