Studies of the clearance of dusts of low solubility from the lower respiratory tracts of dogs utilizing in vivo counting, revealed that for a given aerosolized substance there was a consistent clearance pattern, but among different substances, e.g. ferric oxide, manganic oxide, mercuric oxide, barium sulfate and uranium dioxide, the rate of L R T clearance differs widely during the second phase, i.e. after the first few days. Evidence obtained from excretion data and ultrafiltration studies suggests these differences were determined by the respective in vivo solubilities of the materials studied. Variations in the amount or particle size of a particular aerosol altered the quantitative aspects of both clearance phases but neither appeared to affect the rates of dust clearance in eithkr phase.

In 2017 the Consultative Committee for Electricity and Magnetism (CCEM) commissioned a key comparison of electrical capacitance standards, the second time this quantity has been compared since the implementation of the Mutual Recognition Agreement by the Comité International des Poids et Mesures (CIPM—MRA) in 1999. This comparison—CCEM-K4.2017—was piloted by the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM) and included seven National Metrology Institutes (NMI) belonging to four Regional Metrology Organizations. The measuring scheme adopted for the comparison was that of a star comparison consisting of a set of bilateral comparisons between the participating NMIs and the BIPM, whose capacitance reference base served as a common reference. For each of the bilateral comparisons, the measurands were the capacitance values of 10 pF travelling standard capacitors belonging to the NMIs and, optionally, the values of 100 pF standards. All the participants have been chosen from those able to realize and maintain a representation of the farad at the best known level of accuracy. Four of them, including the BIPM, were taking their traceability from dc or ac quantum Hall effect standards and, the four others, from a calculable capacitor. The comparison results analysis have evidenced an agreement within about ±5 parts in 108 for the mandatory 10 pF measurements and within about ±10 parts in 108 for the optional 100 pF measurements. Also, excepted for one of the participants, a good agreement has been found for the ratio 100 pF:10 pF (within ±5 parts in 108). In addition to the comparison, it has been possible to evaluate the difference between the value of R K (von Klitzing constant) measured by electrical means from calculable capacitors and its last CODATA recommended value (CODATA 2014 adjustment). A difference of (43 ± 23) parts in 109 (k = 1) has been found which is consistent with the difference that can be computed from the experimental data used in the CODATA 2014 adjustment of fundamental constants. This report presents the details of the measurements and analysis having led to these results. Main text To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCEM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

A comparison of capacitance at 10 pF was conducted between thirteen participating laboratories from the Asia-Pacific region. Measurements were made between 2004 and 2006. The behaviour of the travelling artefact was consistent with a steady linear drift at a rate of approximately 0.1 µF/F per year. Despite the wide range of capabilities within the region, the results showed good agreement between all but one of the participating laboratories.Main text. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCEM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA).

Within the framework of the supplementary comparison EURAMET.EM-S31, 'Comparison of capacitance and capacitance ratio', five participants (the BIPM, METAS, LNE, PTB, and VSL) inter-compared their capacitance realisations traced to the quantum Hall resistance measured at either ac or dc. The measurands were the capacitance values of three 10 pF standards and one 100 pF standard, and optionally their voltage and frequency dependences. Because the results were not fully satisfying, the circulation was repeated, augmented by a link to the NMIA calculable capacitor. Also two ac-dc resistors were circulated and their frequency dependences were measured in terms of the ac-dc resistance standards involved in the particular capacitance realisations, to allow inter-comparison of these resistance standards. At the end and in any case, a good agreement is achieved within the expanded uncertainties at coverage factor k = 2. Furthermore, the comparison led to new insight regarding the stability and travelling behaviour of the capacitance standards and, by virtue of the link to the NMIA calculable capacitor, to a determination of the von Klitzing constant in agreement with the 2014 CODATA value. Main text To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCEM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

A comparison of capacitance at 100 pF was conducted between thirteen participating laboratories from the Asia-Pacific region. Measurements were made over the period 2004 to 2006. The behaviour of the travelling artefact was consistent with a steady linear drift at a rate of less than 0.1 µF/F per year. Despite the wide range of capabilities within the region, the results showed good agreement between all participating laboratories.Main text. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the APMP, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA).