Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacies and possible short-term complications in women receiving uterine compression sutures only and those with additional hemostatic procedures for the management of postpartum hemorrhage. Methods: It was a retrospective study carried out from year 2009 to 2019 at a tertiary obstetric hospital and included 79 women who underwent uterine compression sutures (B-Lynch sutures, Hayman's sutures and Cho's sutures) for primary postpartum hemorrhage. Thirty-six of these women had additional hemostatic procedures (uterine artery ligation or embolization) performed for bleeding control. Results: Of the 43 women who were primarily treated with uterine compression sutures only, the success rate to preserve the uterus was 97.7% (42/43). In women with uterine compression sutures and additional hemostatic procedures performed, the success rate was 75% (27/36). Among these two groups of women without peripartum hysterectomy, there were no significant differences in the incidence of secondary postpartum hemorrhage (14.8% vs. 11.9%; P = 0.729), postoperative endometritis (14.8% vs. 14.3%; P > 0.99) and retained products of conception (3.7% vs. 9.5%; P = 0.641) during their 6-week postpartum checkup. Three women were diagnosed to have hematometra. No pyometra or uterine necrosis was noted. Conclusion: Uterine compression sutures with additional hemostatic procedures are effective to control postpartum hemorrhage and prevent hysterectomy. The short-term complication rate is low. Long-term monitoring is needed to identify rare but potentially dangerous complications.
HighlightSex cord stromal tumor with annular tubules has low malignant potential with late recurrence.Oophorectomy is the main stay of treatment.Long term follow-up is important.
Background Uterine compression suture is an important conservative surgical technique in managing atonic postpartum hemorrhage. In this study, we aim to evaluate the subsequent menstrual, fertility and psychological outcomes after uterine compression sutures. Methods This was a prospective cohort study between 2009 and 2022 conducted in a tertiary obstetric unit (6000 deliveries per year) in Hong Kong SAR. Women with primary postpartum hemorrhage successfully treated with uterine compression sutures were followed-up in postnatal clinic for two years after delivery. Data on menstrual pattern were collected during each visit. Psychological impact after uterine compression suture was assessed using a standardized questionnaire. Subsequent pregnancies were identified by territory-wide computer registry and telephone interviews. Women with postpartum hemorrhage treated with uterotonic agents only were chosen as controls. Results In our cohort (n = 80), 87.9% of women had return of menses within six months after delivery. Regular monthly cycle was observed in 95.6% of women. Majority of women reported similar menstrual flow (75%), menstrual days (85.3%) and no change in dysmenorrhea status (88.2%) as compared before. Among eight (11.8%) women who reported hypomenorrhea after uterine compression sutures, two cases of Asherman’s syndrome were diagnosed. Among 23 subsequent pregnancies (16 livebirths), no significant differences in outcome were observed except more omental or bowel adhesions (37.5% vs. 8.8%, p = 0.007), recurrence of hemorrhage (68.8% vs. 7.5%, p < 0.001) and repeated compression sutures (12.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.024) were seen in women with previous compression sutures. Over half of the couple declined future fertility after uterine compression sutures with 38.2% of women recalled unpleasant memories and 22.1% reported life-long adverse impact especially tokophobia. Conclusion Majority of women with history of uterine compression sutures had similar menstruation and pregnancy outcomes as compared to those who did not have sutures. However, they had higher intrapartum risk of visceral adhesions, recurrence of hemorrhage and repeated compression sutures next pregnancy. Furthermore, couple could be more susceptible to negative emotional impact.
Objective To compare the incidences of early and late‐onset neonatal sepsis, including group B streptococcus (GBS) and Escherichia coli (E. coli) before and after implementation of universal screening and intrapartum antibiotics prophylaxis (IAP). Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Eight public hospitals and 31 Maternal and Child Health Centres (in Hong Kong. Population 460 552 women attending routine antenatal service from 2009 to 2020. Methods Universal culture‐based GBS screening has been offered to eligible women since 2012. Total births, GBS screening tests, maternal GBS colonisation and neonatal sepsis with positive blood or cerebrospinal fluid were retrieved from clinical and laboratory database. Main outcome measures Maternal GBS colonisation rate, early‐ and late‐onset neonatal sepsis (including GBS and E. coli). Results Of 318 740 women with universal culture‐based screening, 63 767 women (20.0%) screened positive. After implementation of GBS screening and IAP, the incidence of early‐onset neonatal sepsis decreased (3.25 versus 2.26 per 1000 live births, p < 0.05), including those caused by GBS (1.03 versus 0.26 per 1000 live births, p < 0.05). Segmented regression showed that change in early‐onse GBS sepsis incidence after screening was the only significant variable in the outcome trend. There was no significant evidence of increase in incidence of late‐onset neonatal sepsis including those caused by GBS. Conclusions Universal culture‐based GBS screening and IAP were associated with reduction in early‐onset neonatal sepsis including GBS disease. Although an increase in incidence of late‐onset neonatal sepsis including those caused by GBS cannot be totally ruled out, we did not identify significant evidence that this occurred.
Background Uterine compression suture is an important conservative surgical technique in managing atonic postpartum hemorrhage. In this study, we aim to evaluate the subsequent menstrual, fertility and psychological outcomes after uterine compression sutures. Methods This was a prospective cohort study between 2009 and 2022 conducted in a tertiary obstetric unit (6000 deliveries per year) in Hong Kong SAR. Women with primary postpartum hemorrhage successfully treated with uterine compression sutures were followed-up in postnatal clinic for two years after delivery. Data on menstrual pattern were collected during each visit. Psychological impact after uterine compression suture was assessed using a standardized questionnaire. Subsequent pregnancies were identified by territory-wide computer registry and telephone interviews. Women with postpartum hemorrhage treated with uterotonic agents only were chosen as controls. Results In our cohort (n = 80), 87.9% of women had return of menses within six months after delivery. Regular monthly cycle was observed in 95.6% of women. Majority of women reported similar menstrual flow (75%), menstrual days (85.3%) and no change in dysmenorrhea status (88.2%) as compared before. Among eight (11.8%) women who reported hypomenorrhea after uterine compression sutures, two cases of Asherman’s syndrome were diagnosed. Among 23 subsequent pregnancies (16 livebirths), no significant differences in outcome were observed except more omental or bowel adhesions (37.5% vs 8.8%, p = 0.007), recurrence of hemorrhage (68.8% vs 7.5%, p < 0.001) and repeated compression sutures (12.5% vs 0%, p = 0.024) were seen in women with previous compression sutures. Over half of the couple declined future fertility after uterine compression sutures with 38.2% of women recalled unpleasant memories and 22.1% reported life-long adverse impact especially tokophobia. Conclusion Majority of women with history of uterine compression sutures had similar menstruation and pregnancy outcomes as compared to those who did not have sutures. However, they had higher intrapartum risk of visceral adhesions, recurrence of hemorrhage and repeated compression sutures next pregnancy. Furthermore, couple could be more susceptible to negative emotional impact.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.