Raman spectroscopy (RS) is widely used as a non-invasive technique in screening for the diagnosis of oral cancer. The potential of this optical technique for several biomedical applications has been proved. This work studies the efficacy of RS in detecting oral cancer using sub-site-wise differentiation. A total of 80 samples (44 tumor and 36 normal) were cryopreserved from three different sub-sites: The tongue, the buccal mucosa, and the gingiva of the oral mucosa during surgery. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) were used with principal component analysis (PCA) to classify the samples and the classifications were validated by leave-one-out-cross-validation (LOOCV) and k-fold cross-validation methods. The normal and tumor tissues were differentiated under the PCA-LDA model with an accuracy of 81.25% (sensitivity: 77.27%, specificity: 86.11%). The PCA-QDA classifier model differentiated these tissues with an accuracy of 87.5% (sensitivity: 90.90%, specificity: 83.33%). The PCA-QDA classifier model outperformed the PCA-LDA-based classifier. The model studies revealed that protein, amino acid, and beta-carotene variations are the main biomolecular difference markers for detecting oral cancer.

In this study, we developed a novel quantitative analysis method to enhance the detection capability for oral cancer screening. We combined two different optical techniques, a light-based detection technique (visually enhanced lesion scope) and a vibrational spectroscopic technique (Raman spectroscopy). Materials and methods: Thirty-five oral cancer patients who went through surgery were enrolled. Thirty-five cancer lesions and thirty-five control samples with normal oral mucosa (adjacent to the cancer lesion) were analyzed. Thirty-five autofluorescence images and 70 Raman spectra were taken from 35 cancer and 35 control group cryopreserved samples. The normalized intensity and heterogeneity of the 70 regions of interest (ROIs) were calculated along with 70 averaged Raman spectra. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) were used with principal component analysis (PCA) to differentiate the cancer and control groups (normal). The classifications rates were validated using two different validation methods, leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) and k-fold cross-validation. Results: The cryopreserved normal and tumor tissues were differentiated using the PCA–LDA and PCA–QDA models. The PCA–LDA of Raman spectroscopy (RS) had 82.9% accuracy, 80% sensitivity, and 85.7% specificity, while ROIs on the autofluorescence images were differentiated with 90% accuracy, 100% sensitivity, and 80% specificity. The combination of two optical techniques differentiated cancer and normal group with 97.14% accuracy, 100% sensitivity, and 94.3% specificity. Conclusion: In this study, we combined the data of two different optical techniques. Furthermore, PCA–LDA and PCA–QDA quantitative analysis models were used to differentiate tumor and normal groups, creating a complementary pathway for efficient tumor diagnosis. The error rates of RS and VELcope analysis were 17.10% and 10%, respectively, which was reduced to 3% when the two optical techniques were combined.

Background Oral cancer is one of the most common diseases globally. Conventional oral examination and histopathological examination are the two main clinical methods for diagnosing oral cancer early. VELscope is an oral cancer-screening device that exploited autofluorescence. It yields inconsistent results when used to differentiate between normal, premalignant and malignant lesions. We develop a new method to increase the accuracy of differentiation. Materials and methods Five samples (images) of each of 21 normal mucosae, as well as 31 premalignant and 16 malignant lesions of the tongue and buccal mucosa were collected under both white light and autofluorescence (VELscope, 400-460 nm wavelength). The images were developed using an iPod (Apple, Atlanta Georgia, USA). Results The normalized intensity and standard deviation of intensity were calculated to classify image pixels from the region of interest (ROI). Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) classifiers were used. The performance of both of the classifiers was evaluated with respect to accuracy, precision, and recall. These parameters were used for multiclass classification. The accuracy rate of LDA with un-normalized data was increased by 2% and 14% and that of QDA was increased by 16% and 25% for the tongue and buccal mucosa, respectively. Conclusion The QDA algorithm outperforms the LDA classifier in the analysis of autofluorescence images with respect to all of the standard evaluation parameters.

No abstract

No abstract