Applying algorithms to national administrative data sets provides a readily available method for estimating the prevalence of a chronic condition such as gout, where diagnosis and drug treatment are relatively specific for this disease. We have demonstrated high gout prevalence in the entire Aotearoa New Zealand population, particularly among Māori and Pacific people.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of gout among Maori is one of the highest in the world. This study explores the perceptions, understanding and treatment of gout among Maori. METHODS: A qualitative general inductive approach was used, guided by kaupapa Maori principles. Participants included 12 Maori aged 48–79 years with gout. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken, taped and transcribed. Themes were identified from transcripts. FINDINGS: Participants described overwhelming sufferance due to gout, which was sometimes considered inevitable. All participants believed or had been informed that gout is caused by food and/or drink. This led to feelings of self-blame and blame from partners and employers. Whanau (family) were a resource for information and a support when independence was limited. Rongoa (traditional medicine) played a role in the lives of rural but not urban participants. Many reported stoicism, putting up with pain and putting others before themselves, as the ‘Maori way’. Medicines used for gout management were predominantly non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, colchicine and prednisone, with allopurinol only playing a role late in the disease. Medications were often poorly understood and consequently improperly used. Relationships with health professionals were important, but cultural, financial and time barriers impaired access and understanding. Gout had a huge, negative impact on the lives of participants. CONCLUSION: The quality of lives of many people with gout could be improved by better understanding through educational campaigns for health professionals and the community. Culturally sensitive health care systems and a paradigm shift in gout management and early preventive treatment are needed. KEYWORDS: Drug therapy; ethnic groups; gout; health status disparities; primary health care; qualitative research

No abstract

Although high prevalence of gout in Māori and Pacific people is well-documented, the experience of disease in these groups has not been explored in detail. The aim of this analysis was to describe the experience and impact of gout in Māori and Pacific people. Patients with gout for <10 years were recruited from primary and secondary care settings into a prospective observational study (n = 291; 37 Māori, 35 Pacific, and 219 not Māori or Pacific). Participants attended a baseline study visit which included a comprehensive clinical assessment. Serum urate, flare frequency and activity limitation were recorded at baseline and after 1 year. Māori and Pacific participants had earlier age of onset (by 9 years), higher flare frequency and more features of joint inflammation. Serum urate concentrations were higher in the Māori and Pacific patients at baseline, despite greater use of allopurinol. Māori and Pacific patients reported greater pain and activity limitation and lower health-related quality of life. The cost of gout treatment was more than three times higher in the Māori and Pacific patients. After 1 year, the higher flare frequency and activity limitation persisted in the Māori and Pacific patients. Māori and Pacific people with gout experience early onset, severe disease with frequent flares and poorly controlled hyperuricaemia. Māori and Pacific ethnicity should be recognised as a prognostic factor for more severe outcomes in this disease, and intensive efforts should be made to work with these patients to control serum urate and prevent flares.

There were substantial gaps in the knowledge about gout and its causes and management. All healthcare providers could help identify patients with suboptimal knowledge and improve the management of gout.