No abstract

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

The CASPAR criteria are simple and highly specific but less sensitive than the Vasey and Espinoza criteria.

Objective Existing gout classification criteria have suboptimal sensitivity and/or specificity, and were developed at a time when advanced imaging was not available. The current effort was undertaken to develop new classification criteria for gout. Methods An international group of investigators, supported by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) conducted the following studies: a systematic literature review of advanced imaging, a diagnostic study in which monosodium urate (MSU) crystals in synovial fluid or tophus was the gold standard, a ranking exercise of paper patient cases, and a multi-criterion decision analysis exercise. These data formed the basis for developing the classification criteria, which were tested in an independent dataset. Results The entry criterion for the new classification criteria requires at least one episode of peripheral joint or bursal swelling, pain, or tenderness. The presence of MSU crystals in a symptomatic joint/bursa (i.e., synovial fluid) or in a tophus is a sufficient criterion for gout classification, and does not require further scoring. The domains of the new classification criteria include clinical (pattern of joint/bursa involvement, characteristics and time-course of symptomatic episodes), laboratory (serum urate, MSU-negative synovial fluid aspirate), and imaging (double-contour sign on ultrasound or urate on DECT, radiographic gout-related erosion). The sensitivity and specificity of the criteria are high: 92% and 89%, respectively. Conclusions The new classification criteria, developed using a data-driven and decision-analytic approach, have excellent performance characteristics and have incorporated current state-of-the-art evidence regarding gout.

Objective:To develop comprehensive recommendations for the treatment of the various clinical manifestations of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) based on evidence obtained from a systematic review of the literature and from consensus opinion.Methods:Formal literature reviews of treatment for the most significant discrete clinical manifestations of PsA (skin and nails, peripheral arthritis, axial disease, dactylitis and enthesitis) were performed and published by members of the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA). Treatment recommendations were drafted for each of the clinical manifestations by rheumatologists, dermatologists and PsA patients based on the literature reviews and consensus opinion. The level of agreement for the individual treatment recommendations among GRAPPA members was assessed with an online questionnaire.Results:Treatment recommendations were developed for peripheral arthritis, axial disease, psoriasis, nail disease, dactylitis and enthesitis in the setting of PsA. In rotal, 19 recommendations were drafted, and over 80% agreement was obtained on 16 of them. In addition, a grid that factors disease severity into each of the different disease manifestations was developed to help the clinician with treatment decisions for the individual patient from an evidenced-based perspective.Conclusions:Treatment recommendations for the cardinal physical manifestations of PsA were developed based on a literature review and consensus between rheumatologists and dermatologists. In addition, a grid was established to assist in therapeutic reasoning and decision making for individual patients. It is anticipated that periodic updates will take place using this framework as new data become available.

ObjectiveExisting criteria for the classification of gout have suboptimal sensitivity and/or specificity, and were developed at a time when advanced imaging was not available. The current effort was undertaken to develop new classification criteria for gout.MethodsAn international group of investigators, supported by the American College of Rheumatology and the European League Against Rheumatism, conducted a systematic review of the literature on advanced imaging of gout, a diagnostic study in which the presence of monosodium urate monohydrate (MSU) crystals in synovial fluid or tophus was the gold standard, a ranking exercise of paper patient cases, and a multi-criterion decision analysis exercise. These data formed the basis for developing the classification criteria, which were tested in an independent data set.ResultsThe entry criterion for the new classification criteria requires the occurrence of at least one episode of peripheral joint or bursal swelling, pain, or tenderness. The presence of MSU crystals in a symptomatic joint/bursa (ie, synovial fluid) or in a tophus is a sufficient criterion for classification of the subject as having gout, and does not require further scoring. The domains of the new classification criteria include clinical (pattern of joint/bursa involvement, characteristics and time course of symptomatic episodes), laboratory (serum urate, MSU-negative synovial fluid aspirate), and imaging (double-contour sign on ultrasound or urate on dual-energy CT, radiographic gout-related erosion). The sensitivity and specificity of the criteria are high (92% and 89%, respectively).ConclusionsThe new classification criteria, developed using a data-driven and decision-analytic approach, have excellent performance characteristics and incorporate current state-of-the-art evidence regarding gout.

Objective. Allopurinol is the most commonly used urate-lowering therapy in gout. Allopurinol hypersensitivity syndrome (AHS) is a rare but potentially fatal adverse event. Dosing guidelines based on creatinine clearance have been proposed based on the recognition that dosages of >300 mg/day may be associated with AHS, particularly in patients with renal impairment. However, the relationship between the allopurinol starting dose and AHS is unknown. This study was undertaken to determine the relationship between allopurinol dosing and AHS.Methods. A retrospective case-control study of patients with gout who developed AHS between January 1998 and September 2010 was undertaken. For each case, 3 controls with gout who were receiving allopurinol but did not develop AHS were identified. Controls were matched with cases for sex, diuretic use at the time of initiating allopurinol, age (؎10 years), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (estimated GFR). Starting dose and dose at the time of the reaction in cases were compared between cases and controls.Results. Fifty-four AHS cases and 157 controls were identified. There was an increase in the risk of AHS as the starting dose of allopurinol corrected for the estimated GFR increased. For the highest quintile of starting dose per estimated GFR, the odds ratio was 23.2 (P < 0.01). Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that 91% of AHS cases and 36% of controls received a starting dose of allopurinol of >1.5 mg per unit of estimated GFR (mg/ml/minute). Conclusion. Our findings indicate that starting allopurinol at a dose of 1.5 mg per unit of estimated GFR may be associated with a reduced risk of AHS. In patients who tolerate allopurinol, the dose can be gradually increased to achieve the target serum urate level.Sustained reduction of the serum urate level to Յ6 mg/dl is the mainstay of gout treatment (1-3). Indications for urate-lowering therapy include Ն2 gout attacks per year, chronic gouty arthropathy, tophi, radiographic changes in gout, and urate nephropathy (4,5), as well as polyarticular gout. Allopurinol, the most commonly used urate-lowering therapy, is generally well tolerated; approximately 2% of patients develop a mild rash (6) and up to 5% of patients stop allopurinol because of any adverse event.A rare but potentially fatal adverse event is allopurinol hypersensitivity syndrome (AHS). AHS is characterized by rash (e.g., Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis), eosinophilia, leukocytosis, fever, hepatitis, and renal failure. The mortality associated with AHS is reported to be as high as 27% (7,8). There is no cure; early diagnosis and allopurinol withdrawal are important. Supportive care is the mainstay of treatment (7,9).Risk factors for the development of AHS include female sex, age, renal impairment, diuretic use, recent

Both rehabilitation and social cognition have much to gain from increased dialogue.