Tissues are three-dimensional (3D) entities as is the tumor that arises within them. Though disaggregated cancerous tissues have produced numerous cell lines for basic and applied research, it is generally agreed that these lines are poor models of in vivo phenomena. In this review we focus on in vitro 3D models used in cancer research, particularly their contribution to molecular studies of the early stages of metastasis, angiogenesis, the tumor microenvironment, and cancer stem cells. We present a summary of the various formats used in the field of tissue bioengineering as they apply to mechanistic modeling of cancer stages or processes. In addition we list studies that model specific types of malignancies, highlight drastic differences in results between 3D in vitro models and classical monolayer culturing techniques, and establish the need for standardization of 3D models for meaningful preclinical and therapeutic testing.

Modeling 3D tissues to mimic in-vivo architecture remains a major challenge. As technology advances to provide novel methods of HTS analysis, so do potential pitfalls associated with such models and methods. We remain hopeful that integration of biofabrication with HTS will significantly reduce attrition rates in drug development.

Oct4 is a known master regulator of stem cell renewal and differentiation. Expression of Oct4 during differentiation is regulated by promoter methylation by the nucleosome remodeling and histone deacetylation (NuRD) complex. Here, we show that Cdk2ap1, a negative regulator of Cdk2 function and cell cycle, promotes Oct4 promoter methylation during murine embryonic stem cell differentiation to down-regulate Oct4 expression. We further show that this repressor function of Cdk2ap1 is dependent on its physical interaction with the methyl DNAbinding protein, Mbd3. Our data support a potential molecular link between the known differentiation promoters, including bone morphogenetic proteins and transforming growth factor signaling, and embryonic stem cell differentiation.

Targeted disruption of murine Cdk2ap1, an inhibitor of CDK2 function and hence G1/S transition, results in the embryonic lethality with a high penetration rate. Detailed timed pregnancy analysis of embryos showed that the lethality occurred between embryonic day 3.5 pc and 5.5 pc, a period of implantation and early development of implanted embryos. Two homozygous knockout mice that survived to term showed identical craniofacial defect, including a short snout and a round forehead. Examination of craniofacial morphology by measuring Snout Length (SL) vs. Face Width (FW) showed that the Cdk2ap1+/− mice were born with a reduced SL/FW ratio compared to the Cdk2ap1+/+ and the reduction was more pronounced in Cdk2ap1−/− mice. A transgenic rescue of the lethality was attempted by crossing Cdk2ap1+/− animals with K14-Cdk2ap1 transgenic mice. Resulting Cdk2ap1+/−:K14-Cdk2ap1 transgenic mice showed an improved incidence of full term animals (16.7% from 0.5%) on a Cdk2ap1−/− background. Transgenic expression of Cdk2ap1 in Cdk2ap1−/−:K14-Cdk2ap1 animals restored SL/FW ratio to the level of Cdk2ap1+/−:K14-Cdk2ap1 mice, but not to that of the Cdk2ap1+/+:K14-Cdk2ap1 mice. Teratoma formation analysis using mESCs showed an abrogated in vivo pluripotency of Cdk2ap1−/− mESCs towards a restricted mesoderm lineage specification. This study demonstrates that Cdk2ap1 plays an essential role in the early stage of embryogenesis and has a potential role during craniofacial morphogenesis.

We developed protocols for isolation and characterization of mesenchymal progenitors from murine dermis. Our protocols are part of a more general isolation procedure starting with neonatal murine skin, which has been described in detail by U. Lichti and coauthors (Nat Protoc 3(5):799-810, 2008). We list Lichti's procedures in an abbreviated form as part of this methods section. Our methods to isolate mesenchymal stem cells are presented as a continuous workflow of isolation and characterization, including flow cytometry, cell survival assays, colony formation assays, immunoblotting, immunostaining, multipotential differentiation assays, and in vivo engraftment. In most cases, the protocols are standard; in others, they were adapted to our particular purpose. We made special emphasis on the use of in vitro three-dimensional cultures to cue mesenchymal progenitors into epidermal cells.