Our evidence indicates that PRL-PRLR can escalate the impact of breast cancer on bone metastasis and that the presence of the PRLR in the tumor microenvironment of breast cancer bone metastasis has the potential to modulate the microenvironment to induce lytic osteoclast formation.

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) making up most of these cases. Males have poorer overall survival compared to women following a lung cancer diagnosis. Many studies have focused on the effects of estrogen to explain higher survival rates among women, but few have looked at the effects of androgens. We describe the expression of the androgen receptor (AR) and Ki67 in lung cancer specimens in the Manitoba Tumor Bank (MTB) and correlate these factors with patient outcome. Using the MTB, we performed immunohistochemistry on lung cancer tissue to determine expression of the AR and Ki67. These were then correlated with patient outcome. Of the 136 cases, 55% were female and 55% were adenocarcinoma. AR expression was not independently associated with outcome. Ki67 was associated with a significantly higher hazard ratio for death and recurrence (HR 2.19, 95% CI 1.30-3.70; HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.07-3.46, respectively). AR expression modified the effect of Ki67 on outcome, such that when both were expressed, there was no association with recurrence or survival (HR 2.39, 95% CI 1.31-4.36 for AR- Ki67+ vs HR 1.54, 95% CI 0.44-5.37 for AR+ Ki67+). Ki67 was associated with poorer outcomes alone. AR status alone was not associated with outcome. Although the mechanism remains unclear, AR status seems to negate the association of a high Ki67 and poor outcome.

ObjectivesTo provide a comprehensive systematic overview of current evidence from pooled analyses/meta-analyses and systematic reviews (PMASRs) pertaining to dairy consumption and incident cancer and/or all-cause or cancer-specific mortality.DesignOverview of reviews.SettingCommunity setting.ParticipantsThe unit of analysis is PMASRs. A total of 42 PMASRs was included in this overview of reviews.Interventions/exposuresAny dairy product consumption (eg, milk, yogurt, etc).Primary and secondary outcomes measuresPrimary outcome measure is development of any type of cancer. Secondary outcome measures are all-cause mortality and cancer-specific mortality.ResultsFrom 9693 citations identified, we included 42 PMASRs (52 study reports) published between 1991 and 2017. Thirty-one (74%) of these was pooled analyses/meta analyses, and only 11 (26%) were systematic reviews and meta-analyses. There was a wide variability in the type of study designs included within the other PMASRs, thus contributing to variable and, in instances, divergent estimates of cancer risk for several cancer subtypes. For example, only one systematic review and meta-analysis exclusively included prospective study designs. Most PMASRs were of low to moderate quality based on the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) scores. The median AMSTAR score was 5 (IQR 2–7). Our overview identified conflicting evidence from PMASRs on association between dairy consumption and incident cancers or mortality. Heterogeneity in summary estimates reflected the inclusion of variable study designs and overall low methodological quality of individual PMASRs.ConclusionsThe association between dairy consumption and cancer risk has been explored in PMASRs with a variety of study designs and of low to moderate quality. To fully characterise valid associations between dairy consumption and risk of cancer and/or mortality rigorously conducted, PMASRs including only high-quality prospective study designs are required.Trial registration numberCRD42017078463.