Introduction
Both high-voltage (>1000 V) and low-voltage (< 1000 V) electrical burns can cause serious injuries due to dissipation of heat as electric current passes through deep tissues. Because of tissue loss and vital structure exposure, flap-based reconstruction is frequently performed in patients with these injuries. Depending on clinical presentation, both free and pedicled flaps may be indicated. We wondered if reported reconstructive outcomes after electrical injury differ between free and pedicled flaps when implemented in the immediate post-injury period.
Methods
A systematic literature review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted using PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE databases. Articles that were included described patients with electrical burn injuries who underwent reconstruction with either free or pedicled flaps within 90 days of injury. Technique articles or articles lacking outcomes analysis were excluded. Data was extracted from articles that met inclusion and exclusion criteria, including flap type, timing of reconstruction, complications, and patient demographics. Statistical analysis was performed with chi-square tests.
Results
Of 536 articles obtained from the literature search, 37 met criteria. To date, no randomized control trials comparing these modalities have been performed. In total, these studies reported on 364 total patients who experienced high- and low-voltage electrical burn injuries. Pooled reported outcomes of 374 flap reconstructions were analyzed, including 145 free flaps and 229 pedicled flaps. Reported complication rates did not differ significantly between free flaps (30/145, 20.7%) and pedicled flaps (46/229, 20.1%; p = .89). However, free flaps experienced significantly higher failure rates than pedicled flaps (13/145, 9.0% vs. 0/229, 0%; p = < .05).
Conclusions
Electrical burn injuries present a unique indication for flap-based reconstruction in the immediate post-burn phase of care. However, substantial variation exists amongst physicians regarding whether to proceed with a free flap or pedicled flap surgery when indicated. Our data identified an overall significant difference between free versus pedicled flap failure rate but did not identify a significant difference between overall complication rates.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.