In their recent article published in the journal Scientific Reports, Büntgen and Di Cosmo have attempted to solve the historical mystery of the sudden Mongol withdrawal from Hungary after a year-long occupation. We cannot share the authors’ viewpoint that environmental circumstances contributed to the decision of the Mongols to abandon Hungary since the hypothesis lacks support from environmental, archaeological and historical evidence. Historical source material in particular suggests that the Mongols were able to settle and sustain their herds in Hungary as is clearly stated in a letter by King Bela IV to the pope. The Mongol army arrived in the kingdom at the end of a severe drought, and we present empirical evidence that the abundant rain in the spring of 1242 CE did not worsen but rather improved their prospects for sufficient food supplies and pasturage. The marshy terrain of the Hungarian Plain likely did not precipitate the Mongol withdrawal as the Mongol high command ultimately stationed their main forces around the marshy Volga Delta. In contrast to what Büntgen and Di Cosmo have suggested, we argue that the reasons for the sudden withdrawal cannot be explained largely by environmental factors.
<p>Climate responses to major tropical volcanic eruptions bring about complex social effects with lasting historical consequences. Based on several historical episodes, we establish an argument that the weather-altering eruption of Samalas (1257), which shifted the Asian monsoon and caused global weather anomalies, may have played a significant role in the breakup of the Mongol Empire. The empire&#8217;s end came soon after the largest eruption of the Common Era, and its political situation devolved into open warfare between claimants to the throne. While this has previously been described in the historiography as a purely political series of events guided by individual actors&#8217; motivations, the state&#8217;s collapse occurred in fact amidst a series of epidemics, droughts, famines, and erratic weather which can be plausibly tied to aftereffects of the eruption.&#160;</p><p>&#160;</p><p>Focusing on a few case studies, textual sources mention a fatal epidemic in southwestern China in 1259 which suddenly ended the life of M&#246;ngke Khan, the last ruler of the unified Mongol Empire. Based on terminology and descriptions of the epidemic, records of cholera across the larger region, and an ostensible relationship between other historical mega eruptions and ensuing pandemics, we argue that 1259 may have seen a cholera outbreak. Secondly, we note that the hydroclimatic aftereffect of extreme drought over Mongolia and Eastern China, peaking in 1259-60, weakened cavalry forces based in Inner Asia and the Mongolian Plateau. The drought and resultant famine had major historical consequences by influencing the outcome of the civil war (1259&#8211;1264) fought between M&#246;ngke Khan&#8217;s surviving brothers for control of the empire. Mongolia lost its undisputed central position as the state fragmented into at least six independent khanates, marking the end of the unified Mongol Empire. While political events and human decisions played major roles in developments, and societal responses could ameliorate the Samalas eruption&#8217;s impact, we argue that ignoring it leaves out an important element of our understanding of these events of global historical significance. The work of the researchers is presently being prepared for publication.</p>
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.