Despite refinements in surgical technique, including bone grafting and sophisticated prosthetic reconstructions, there are limitations to what can be achieved with bone-anchored fixed prostheses in patients with advanced atrophy of the maxillae. A new approach was suggested by a long-term study on onlay bone grafting and simultaneous placement of a fixture based on a new design: the zygoma fixture, and the aim of this study was to assess its potential. Twenty-eight consecutive patients with severely resorbed edentulous maxillae were included, 13 of whom had previously had multiple fixture surgery in the jawbone that had failed. A total of 52 zygoma fixtures and 106 conventional fixtures were installed. Bone grafting was deemed necessary in 17 patients. All patients have been followed for at least five years, and nine for up to 10 years. All patients were followed up with clinical and radiographic examinations, and in some cases rhinoscopy and sinoscopy as well. Three zygoma fixtures failed; two at the time of connection of the abutment and the third after six years. Of the conventional fixtures placed at the time of the zygoma fixture, 29 (27%) were lost. The overall prosthetic rehabilitation rate was 96% after at least five years of function. There were no signs of inflammatory reaction in the surrounding antral mucosa. Four patients with recurrent sinusitis recovered after inferior meatal antrostomy. To conclude, the zygoma fixture seems to be a valuable addition to our repertoire in the management of the compromised maxilla.
Comparable results, related to continuous prosthesis stability, were shown for the Novum approach compared with the traditional two-staged procedure. Survival of individual fixtures is lower when immediate loading is applied.
This study reports the results of torsion tests, pull-out tests, and lateral loading tests on osseointegrated commercially pure titanium fixtures. The tests were performed in vivo on six beagle dogs. Three fixtures, each with a diameter of 3.7 mm, were installed bilaterally in the tibia of each animal. The mean maximal pull-out load was 1.55 kN (n = 4), the mean maximal lateral transverse load was 0.21 kN (n = 2), the mean maximal lateral axial load was 0.18 kN (n = 2), the mean breakpoint torque was 0.31 Nm (n = 3), and the mean maximal torque was 0.43 Nm (n = 3). The torsion test revealed an almost immediate plastic deformation of the interface between the implant and bone; this indicates that although the contact between the bone and the implant is close, there is no strong bond, at least not in shear. The major transfer of load from the implant to the surrounding bone tissue must therefore depend on the design of the implant. A histological evaluation with measurements of the amount of bone in contact with the fixtures was performed. By the use of the histological and mechanical data, it is possible to estimate shear stresses in bone tissue (pull-out test) and in the interface (torque test). The mean maximal shear stress in bone tissue in the pull-out tests was 100 MPa (n = 4); the mean shear stress in the interface was 4.3 MPa (n = 3) in the torsion tests at the breakpoint torque and was 6.0 MPa (n = 3) at the maximal torque. It was also possible to estimate the shear modulus of elasticity in the pull-out and torque tests. The mean shear modulus in pull-out was 119 MPa (n = 4), and the mean apparent shear modulus in torsion was 9 kPa (n = 3) for an assumed interface thickness of 100 nm and was 86 kPa (n = 3) for an assumed interface thickness of 1,000 nm.
This study showed that 4 mm implants can support an FDP in severely resorbed posterior mandibles for at least 2 years and with healthy peri-implant conditions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.