BackgroundThe presence of perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS), perfluorohexanesulfonate (PFHS), and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) has been reported in humans and wildlife. Pharmacokinetic differences have been observed in laboratory animals.ObjectiveThe purpose of this observational study was to estimate the elimination half-life of PFOS, PFHS, and PFOA from human serum.MethodsTwenty-six (24 male, 2 female) retired fluorochemical production workers, with no additional occupational exposure, had periodic blood samples collected over 5 years, with serum stored in plastic vials at −80°C. At the end of the study, we used HPLC-mass spectrometry to analyze the samples, with quantification based on the ion ratios for PFOS and PFHS and the internal standard 18O2-PFOS. For PFOA, quantitation was based on the internal standard 13C2-PFOA.ResultsThe arithmetic mean initial serum concentrations were as follows: PFOS, 799 ng/mL (range, 145–3,490); PFHS, 290 ng/mL (range, 16–1,295); and PFOA, 691 ng/mL (range, 72–5,100). For each of the 26 subjects, the elimination appeared linear on a semi-log plot of concentration versus time; therefore, we used a first-order model for estimation. The arithmetic and geometric mean half-lives of serum elimination, respectively, were 5.4 years [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.9–6.9] and 4.8 years (95% CI, 4.0–5.8) for PFOS; 8.5 years (95% CI, 6.4–10.6) and 7.3 years (95% CI, 5.8–9.2) for PFHS; and 3.8 years (95% CI, 3.1–4.4) and 3.5 years (95% CI, 3.0–4.1) for PFOA.ConclusionsBased on these data, humans appear to have a long half-life of serum elimination of PFOS, PFHS, and PFOA. Differences in species-specific pharmacokinetics may be due, in part, to a saturable renal resorption process.

Perfluorooctanesulfonyl fluoride-based products have included surfactants, paper and packaging treatments, and surface protectants (e.g., for carpet, upholstery, textile). Depending on the specific functional derivatization or degree of polymerization, such products may degrade or metabolize, to an undetermined degree, to perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS), a stable and persistent end product that has the potential to bioaccumulate. In this investigation, a total of 645 adult donor serum samples from six American Red Cross blood collection centers were analyzed for PFOS and six other fluorochemicals using HPLC-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. PFOS concentrations ranged from the lower limit of quantitation

In 2000, 3M Company, the primary global manufacturer, announced a phase-out of perfluorooctanesulfonyl fluoride (POSF, C 8 F 17 SO 2 F)-based materials after perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS, C 8 F 17 SO 3 -) was reported in human populations and wildlife. The purpose of this study was to determine whether PFOS and other polyfluoroalkyl concentrations in plasma samples, collected in 2006 from six American Red Cross adult blood donor centers, have declined compared to nonpaired serum samples from the same locations in 2000-2001. For each location, 100 samples were obtained evenly distributed by age (20-69 years) and sex. Analytes measured, using tandem mass spectrometry, were PFOS, perfluorooctanoate (PFOA), perfluorohexanesulfonate (PFHxS), perfluorobutanesulfonate (PFBS), N-methyl perfluorooctanesulfonamidoacetate (Me-PFOSA-AcOH), and N-ethyl perfluorooctanesulfonamidoacetate (Et-PFOSA-AcOH). The geometric mean plasma concentrations were for PFOS 14.5 ng/mL (95% CI 13.9-15.2), PFOA 3.4 ng/ mL (95% CI 3.3-3.6), and PFHxS 1.5 ng/mL (95% CI 1.4-1.6). The majority of PFBS, Me-PFOSA-AcOH, and Et-PFOSA-AcOH concentrations were less than the lower limit of quantitation. Age-and sex-adjusted geometric means were lower in 2006 (approximately 60% for PFOS, 25% for PFOA, and 30% for PFHxS) than those in 2000-2001. The declines for PFOS and PFHxS are consistent with their serum elimination half-lives and the time since the phase-out of POSF-based materials. The shorter serum elimination half-life for PFOA and its smaller percentage decline than PFOS suggests PFOA concentrations measured in the general population are unlikely to be solely attributed to POSF-based materials. Direct and indirect exposure sources of PFOA could include historic and ongoing electrochemical cell fluorination (ECF) of PFOA, telomer production of PFOA, fluorotelomer-based precursors, and other fluoropolymer production.

Objectives Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) results in peroxisome proliferator mediated effects in rats and mice resulting in hypolipidemia but not in monkeys. Counterintuitive modestly positive associations between PFOA and cholesterol levels in production workers have been inconsistently reported. The purpose of this assessment was to examine this association in male workers who manufactured or used PFOA at three facilities. Methods Subjects were male employee voluntary participants of a fluorochemical medical surveillance program who provided blood samples for serum measurement of PFOA (perfluorooctanoate) and various lipid, hepatic, and thyroid parameters. Statistical analyses included multiple and logistic regression and analysis of covariance. Results A total of 506 employees, who did not take cholesterol-lowering medications (93% of all male participants), were analyzed. Serum PFOA concentrations ranged from 0.007 to 92.03 lg/ml [arithmetic mean 2.21 lg/ml (95% confidence interval 1.66-2.77), median 1.10 lg/ml]. Adjusted for age, body mass index, and alcohol usage in regression analyses, PFOA was not statistically significantly (P > 0.05) associated with total cholesterol or low-density lipoproteins (LDL). High-density lipoproteins (HDL) were significantly negatively (P < 0.01) associated with PFOA for the three facilities combined but not by individual sites, indicating the overall result was likely a consequence of residual confounding due to different demographic profiles at these sites. Serum triglycerides were significantly positively associated with PFOA but not consistently by locations. There were no statistically significant associations observed between PFOA and hepatic enzymes for the three facilities combined although some modest positive associations were observed between PFOA and hepatic enzymes at one of the three facilities. Analyses of all locations showed no associations with TSH or T4 and PFOA. A negative association was observed for free T4 and positive association for T3; however, the findings were well within these assays' normal reference ranges. Conclusion There was no evidence that employees' serum PFOA concentrations were associated with total cholesterol or LDL. A negative association with HDL was explained by demographic differences across the three locations. Several explanations are offered for the inconsistent triglyceride associations with PFOA including both methodological as well as biological possibilities.

No abstract