PurposeTo compare two commonly used methods of temporary hemiepiphysiodesis (staples and figure of eight plate) in the management of coronal plane deformities of the knee in skeletally immature children.MethodsThis prospective study was conducted between November 2012 and November 2015. A total of 40 patients with 67 affected knee joints, having at least 1 year of skeletal growth remaining, were included in the study. Angular correction was measured by recording the mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), and anatomical tibio-femoral angle (TFA) (for the overall alignment of lower limbs). Implant removal was done after 5° of overcorrection was achieved. The rate of correction (° per month) and complications related to each technique were recorded.ResultsThe most common diagnosis was idiopathic genu valgum. The overall rate of correction (TFA) was 1.2° for staples and 1.4° for eight plate (p = 0.70, not statistically significant). The correction in mLDFA was statistically better in the eight plate group, whereas an opposite trend was recorded in mMPTA. Implant-related complications were present in two cases of the staples group.ConclusionAlthough the overall correction rate was similar in both groups, implant-related complications were lower with figure of eight plate. In idiopathic genu valgum (the most common diagnosis), the correction was statistically better in the eight plate group. We recommend figure of eight plate over staples in managing these deformities.

Introduction: There is a lack of in vivo studies comparing the functional outcome and knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using fixed loop (EndoButton (EB) CL) and adjustable loop (TightRope (TR) RT) devices for femoral fixation of soft tissue grafts. Materials and methods: Functional outcomes were assessed in terms of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm scores, knee stability by anteroposterior laxity and side-to-side difference (SSD) using KT-1000 arthrometer. The evaluation was performed preoperatively and postoperatively at 6 months and 2 years. Results: Both groups were matched in terms of demographic, preoperative, intraoperative and post-operative covariates. EB (n ¼ 52) appeared to have better IKDC and Lysholm scores at 6 months post-operative when compared to TR (n ¼ 50). However, at a final follow-up of 2 years, the results were similar. The anterior tibial translation and SSD were statistically insignificant between the two groups at 6 months and 2 years. Conclusion: ACLR using EB or TR for femoral fixation gives substantially equivalent functional results and knee stability at mid-term follow-up.

The risk of malpositioning of the syndesmotic screws is very high. A lack of standard radiological or physical references for accurate syndesmotic screw placement is a potential contributing factor in syndesmotic screw malpositioning. Malleolar tips are clinically as well as radiologically appreciable bony references. The purpose of this preliminary CT based study was to investigate the axial relations of the central syndesmotic axis with the malleolar tips. Methods: CT based studies of uninjured adult ankle joints with intact syndesmosis, conducted over a six months period were analysed. The axial differences between the coronal plane along the malleolar tips and that along the central syndesmotic axis in the axial plane were measured. Gender-based variations were also analyzed. Results: A total of 70 CT studies were analyzed, and the axial difference between the malleolar tips based coronal plane and that along the central syndesmotic axis was observed to be 3.70 ± 5.61 . The male and female measurements were comparable. Conclusion:Being in a static relation to the syndesmosis independent of the foot position and the limb rotation, the malleolar tips can be reliably used as references for directing syndesmotic screw in the axial plane. A knowledge of this axial difference between malleolar tips and central syndesmotic axis can help surgeons in an accurate syndesmotic screw placement.

Background:Medial close wedge, lateral open wedge, dome and “V” osteotomies are the commonly to correct the genu valgum (GV) deformity. However, the ideal method for the correction of coronal plane deformity is controversial. This prospective study is to evaluate the functional and radiological result of supracodylar “V” osteotomy to correct GV deformity.Materials and Methods:“V” osteotomy was done in all patients with clinically significant GV deformity and was fixed with crossed K-wires. Weight-bearing mobilization was started after radiological union. Patients were evaluated for correction in different clinical and radiological parameters. The function of the knee was assessed by Bostman's score. The subjective score was used to assess the parent's satisfaction after the procedure.Results:187 limbs with genu valgum deformity (47 males and 71 females) were included in this study. We observed a significant improvement in the mean intermalleolar distance, clinical and radiological tibiofemoral angle and lateral distal femoral angle, from 17.3 to 3.9 cm, 23.8°to–4.5°, 25.6° to 6.1°, 76.6° to 88.4°, respectively. The mean Bostman score improved from 20.6 to 28.1. The parent's satisfaction assessed subjectively was 95.3 points.Conclusion:This osteotomy along with the fixation with K-wires is a safe, effective, reproducible technique with a short learning curve and a procedure requiring no repeat surgery for implant removal, with good functional results, and without major complications.

No abstract