No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Salivary IL-6 mRNA was previously identified as a promising biomarker of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). We performed a multi-center investigation covering all geographic areas of Hungary. Saliva from 95 patients with OSCC and 80 controls, all Caucasian, were collected together with demographic and clinicopathological data. Salivary IL-6 mRNA was quantified by real-time quantitative PCR. Salivary IL-6 protein concentration was measured by enzyme-linked immune-sorbent assay. IL-6 protein expression in tumor samples was investigated by immunohistochemistry. Normalized salivary IL-6 mRNA expression values were significantly higher (p < 0.001) in patients with OSCC (mean ± SE: 3.301 ± 0.885) vs. controls (mean ± SE: 0.037 ± 0.012). Differences remained significant regardless of tumor stage and grade. AUC of the ROC curve was 0.9379 (p < 0.001; 95% confidence interval: 0.8973–0.9795; sensitivity: 0.945; specificity: 0.819). Salivary IL-6 protein levels were significantly higher (p < 0.001) in patients (mean ± SE: 70.98 ± 14.06 pg/mL), than in controls (mean ± SE: 12.45 ± 3.29). Specificity and sensitivity of IL-6 protein were less favorable than that of IL-6 mRNA. Salivary IL-6 mRNA expression was significantly associated with age and dental status. IL-6 manifestation was detected in tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating leukocytes, suggesting the presence of a paracrine loop of stimulation. Salivary IL-6 mRNA is one of the best performing and clinically relevant biomarkers of OSCC.

The authors compared N0 with N+ cases in neoadjuvant chemotherapy regression and recurrence. During a 12-year period, 180 consecutive oral squamous cell cancer patients were observed. Of these patients, 78 were N0 and 102 N+ stages. The drugs used were as follows: bleomycin, vincristine, methotrexate, and mitolactol. After three courses of chemotherapy, the regression (complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and no response (NR)) and side effect rate were determined. All patients were operated on and observed for the number and localization of recurrences during 3 year follow-up time. The N0 cases came from T2-3, while N+ was from T2-4a (AJCC 2002). The regression in the N0 group was CR 46%, PR 53%, and NR 1%; but in the N+ group, it was CR 12%, PR 72%, and NR 16%. The regression rate was significantly higher (p = 0.00025) for N0 group than N+ group. The regression rate for T3 N0 was significantly higher (p = 0.055) than for T3 N+ cases. In the N0 stage, the regression rate was significantly higher (p = 0.0174) for T2 than T3. In N+ stage, there was no significant difference (p = 0.183) for T2-4a. The side effects were slight. The recurrence rate for the N0 group was significantly lower (15%, p = 0.000069), while for N+ group, it was 59%. The dependence in the T3 cases was also significant (p = 0.009) in the 3-year tumor-free survival. The N stage seems a more important prognostic factor for chemotherapy response and recurrence rate than the T stage. Stage III can be divided into subgroups without metastasis (III.a) and with metastasis (III.b.), based on significant difference in regression and recurrence rate.