The objective of this review is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of imaging methods for detection of mandibular bone tissue invasion by squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). A systematic review was carried out of studies in MEDLINE, SciELO and ScienceDirect, published between 1960 and, in English, Spanish or German, which compared detection of mandibular bone tissue invasion via different imaging tests against a histopathology reference standard. Sensitivity and specificity data were extracted from each study. The outcome measure was diagnostic accuracy. We found 338 articles, of which 5 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Tests included were: CT (four articles), MRI (four articles), panoramic radiography (one article), positron emission tomography (PET)/CT (one article) and cone beam CT (CBCT) (one article). The quality of articles was low to moderate and the evidence showed that all tests have a high diagnostic accuracy for detection of mandibular bone tissue invasion by SCC, with sensitivity values of 94% (MRI), 91% (CBCT), 83% (CT) and 55% (panoramic radiography), and specificity values of 100% (CT, MRI, CBCT), 97% (PET/CT) and 91.7% (panoramic radiography). Available evidence is scarce and of only low to moderate quality. However, it is consistently shown that current imaging methods give a moderate to high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of mandibular bone tissue invasion by SCC. Recommendations are given for improving the quality of future reports, in particular provision of a detailed description of the patients' conditions, the imaging instrument and both imaging and histopathological invasion criteria.
Background: Preclinical studies have shown the combination of imetelstat (GRN163L), an inhibitor of telomerase, and T results in synergistic growth inhibition and restoration of T sensitivity in T-resistant cells (Clin Can Res 12(10):3184–92, 2006). Here we translate those findings to the clinic with the first-in-man phase I trial of imetelstat+ T in patients (pts) with T-refractory HER2+ metastatic disease. Methods: T (6 mg/kg q3 wk) was administered with increasing doses of imetelstat (240/300/375 mg/m2 q3 wk) using a standard 3+3 dose escalation design. Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) was based on toxicity observed during cycle 1. Responding or stable pts continued treatment until progression. Tumor biopsy and bone marrow aspirate for biologic correlates were obtained at baseline and prior to cycle 2. Limited pharmacokinetics (PK) for T and imetelstat were included. Results: Ten pts were enrolled; median age was 54 (28–64). Patients were extensively pre-treated with the number of prior regimens ranging from 3 to >12. Prior cytotoxic therapies included anthracyclines (n = 9), taxanes (n = 9), vinorelbine (n = 8), capecitabine (n = 8), gemcitabine (n = 6), ixabepilone (n = 4), and eribulin (n = 4). Prior anti-HER2 targeted therapies included trastuzumab (n = 10), capecitabine (n = 8), T-DM1 (n = 6), and pertuzumab (n = 1). Therapy was well tolerated; no treatment related grade 4 toxicities were observed. Myelosuppression was limited to one pt with Grade 2 anemia and one each with Grade 2/3 thrombocytopenia. MTD was not reached. There were no objective responses; 2 pts. in cohort 3 had SD. Serial tumor biopsies and bone marrow aspirates have been analyzed for 7 pts (cohort 1: 001–004; cohort 2: 005–007; cohort 3: analysis ongoing). Tumor hTERT (p = ns) and phosphorylated HER2 (p = 0.03) decreased after treatment in nearly all pts. Bone marrow S-phase did not change consistently with treatment. Conclusion: The combination of trastuzumab + imetelstat is well tolerated and results in decreases in HER2 phosphorylation similar to that seen in preclinical models. Additional biologic correlates and PK analyses are ongoing. Further study of this combination in less heavily pre-treated patients is planned. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-18-13.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.