Immunocytochemistry, radioimmunoassay, chromatography, and biological assay using a rabbit isolated duodenal muscle strip preparation were used in attempting to characterize motilin from the rat small intestine. Several different antisera and monoclonal antibodies directed against natural porcine motilin were used. A variety of fixation techniques using Bouin's, paraformaldehyde, and benzoquinone with different staining methods including, fluorescein-conjugated second antibody, peroxidase-antiperoxidase or peroxidase-conjugated second antibody techniques were used. All methods failed to detect immunoreactive motilin cells in the rat small intestine. The same antisera were used in radioimmunoassays for motilin to evaluate extracts of rat intestinal tissue. Two of these detected immunoreactive motilin in gut extracts, and these antisera showed a different distribution for the peptide. Samples containing immunoreactive motilin obtained from cation exchange chromatography on SP-Sephadex-G25 were concentrated and assayed for biological activity in a rabbit duodenal muscle strip preparation. Desensitization of duodenal tissue to porcine motilin could be demonstrated by pretreatment with this peptide. The biological activity of partially purified rat intestinal immunoreactive motilin was not prevented by pretreatment of the tissue with motilin. Further purification of this preparation on Bio-Gel P-10 yielded an immunoreactive motilin peak that co-eluted with natural porcine motilin. Rat intestinal immunoreactive motilin did not co-elute with natural porcine motilin following high pressure liquid chromatography on a Waters microBondapak C18 reversed-phase column using a linear gradient of water-acetonitrile (10-45%) over 30 min. Although of similar molecular size, rat motilin is probably structurally dissimilar to other mammalian motilins.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.