The baseline data from GLORIA-AF phase 2 demonstrate that in newly diagnosed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients, NOAC have been highly adopted into practice, becoming more frequently prescribed than VKA in Europe and North America. Worldwide, however, a large proportion of patients remain undertreated, particularly in Asia and North America. (Global Registry on Long-Term Oral Antithrombotic Treatment in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation [GLORIA-AF]; NCT01468701).

Background and purpose Prospectively collected data comparing the safety and effectiveness of individual non-vitamin K antagonists (NOACs) are lacking. Our objective was to directly compare the effectiveness and safety of NOACs in patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods In GLORIA-AF, a large, prospective, global registry program, consecutive patients with newly diagnosed AF were followed for 3 years. The comparative analyses for (1) dabigatran vs rivaroxaban or apixaban and (2) rivaroxaban vs apixaban were performed on propensity score (PS)-matched patient sets. Proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for outcomes of interest. Results The GLORIA-AF Phase III registry enrolled 21,300 patients between January 2014 and December 2016. Of these, 3839 were prescribed dabigatran, 4015 rivaroxaban and 4505 apixaban, with median ages of 71.0, 71.0, and 73.0 years, respectively. In the PS-matched set, the adjusted HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dabigatran vs rivaroxaban were, for stroke: 1.27 (0.79–2.03), major bleeding 0.59 (0.40–0.88), myocardial infarction 0.68 (0.40–1.16), and all-cause death 0.86 (0.67–1.10). For the comparison of dabigatran vs apixaban, in the PS-matched set, the adjusted HRs were, for stroke 1.16 (0.76–1.78), myocardial infarction 0.84 (0.48–1.46), major bleeding 0.98 (0.63–1.52) and all-cause death 1.01 (0.79–1.29). For the comparison of rivaroxaban vs apixaban, in the PS-matched set, the adjusted HRs were, for stroke 0.78 (0.52–1.19), myocardial infarction 0.96 (0.63–1.45), major bleeding 1.54 (1.14–2.08), and all-cause death 0.97 (0.80–1.19). Conclusions Patients treated with dabigatran had a 41% lower risk of major bleeding compared with rivaroxaban, but similar risks of stroke, MI, and death. Relative to apixaban, patients treated with dabigatran had similar risks of stroke, major bleeding, MI, and death. Rivaroxaban relative to apixaban had increased risk for major bleeding, but similar risks for stroke, MI, and death. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT01468701, NCT01671007. Date of registration: September 2013. Graphical abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Ventricular fibrillation during coronary angiography with Renografin-76 (meglumine sodium diatrizoate) has been attributed to the calcium-binding additives sodium citrate and sodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), which may produce repolarization changes manifested as prolongation of the QT interval. Angiovist-370 is a newer form of meglumine sodium diatrizoate that contains calcium EDTA as its additive and thus has a decreased calcium-binding effect. Eight hundred sixteen patients were prospectively randomized to receive either Renografin-76 or Angiovist-370. Ventricular fibrillation occurred in 10 of 410 patients receiving Renografin-76 and in 0 of 406 patients given Angiovist-370 (p less than 0.0005). Clinical data were analyzed without knowledge of other data in the 10 patients treated with Renografin-76 who had ventricular fibrillation (Group I), 103 randomly selected patients who also received Renografin-76 but had no ventricular fibrillation (Group II) and 108 randomly selected patients given Angiovist-370 (Group III). Of several variables examined, only the QT interval differentiated patients receiving Renografin-76 and Angiovist-370. The mean corrected QT interval (QTc interval) before coronary angiography was slightly but not significantly (p = 0.7) higher in Group I than in Groups II and III. Ten seconds after the first left coronary artery injection it was more prolonged in Groups I and II (0.552 and 0.561 second, respectively) than in Group III (0.448 second) (p less than 0.00005). Similarly, 10 seconds after the first right coronary artery injection it was significantly longer in Groups I and II (0.545 and 0.544 second) than in Group III (0.477 second) (p less than 0.00005).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)